Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Parameterized Scheme of Metaheuristics to Solve NP-Hard Problems in Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Efficiency and Productivity

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 249))

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a well-known methodology for estimating technical efficiency from a set of inputs and outputs of Decision Making Units (DMUs). This paper is devoted to computational aspects of DEA models when the determination of the least distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier is the goal. Commonly, these models have been addressed in the literature by applying unsatisfactory techniques, based essentially on combinatorial NP-hard problems. Recently, some heuristics have been introduced to solve these situations. This work improves on previous heuristics for the generation of valid solutions. More valid solutions are generated and with lower execution time. A parameterized scheme of metaheuristics is developed to improve the solutions obtained through heuristics. A hyper-heuristic is used over the parameterized scheme. The hyper-heuristic searches in a space of metaheuristics and generates metaheuristics that provide solutions close to the optimum. The method is competitive versus exact methods, and has a lower execution time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aigner DJ, Chu SF (1968) On estimating the industry production function. Am Econ Rev 58:826–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida F, Giménez D, López-Espín JJ, Pérez-Pérez M (2013a) Parameterized schemes of metaheuristics: basic ideas and applications with genetic algorithms, scatter search and GRASP. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 43(3):570–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida F, Giménez D, López-Espín JJ (2013b) A parameterized shared-memory scheme for parameterized metaheuristics. J Supercomput 58(3):292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S (2010) A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Optimization 59:985–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando K, Kai A, Maeda Y, Sekitani K (2012) Least distance based inefficiency measures on the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 55(1):73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Pastor JT (2013) A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA. Appl Math Comput 219:9142–9154

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Pastor JT (2014a) On how to properly calculate the Euclidean distance-based measure in DEA. Optimization 63(3):421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Pastor JT (2014b) Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA. Omega 44:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2007) Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. J Prod Anal 28:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Mahlberg B, Pastor JT, Sahoo BK (2014a) Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action. Eur J Oper Res 239:776–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Borras F, Ortiz L, Pastor JT (2014b) Benchmarking in healthcare: an approach based on closest targets. In: Emrouznejad A, Cabanda E (ed) Managing service productivity. International series in operations research & management science, vol 215, Springer, Berlin, pp 67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek C, Lee J (2009) The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the least-distance measure. Math Comput Model 49:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente C, López-Espín JJ, Aparicio J, Pastor JT, Giménez D (2014) Closets targets, benchmarking and data envelopment analysis: a heuristic algorithm to obtain valid solutions for the shortest projection problem. In: 11th international conference on applied computing

    Google Scholar 

  • Briec W (1997) Minimum distance to the complement of a convex set: duality result. J Optim Theory Appl 93(2):301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J Econ 30:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye L, Van Puyenbroeck T (2001) A comment on multi-stage DEA methodology. Oper Res Lett 28:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb CW, Douglas PH (1928) A theory of production, vol 18, issue 1. In: The American economic review, supplement, papers and proceedings of the fortieth annual meeting of the American economic association, pp 139–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to others models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal 11:5–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrel MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A (General) 120(3):253–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei FX, Harker PT (1999) Projections onto efficient frontiers: theoretical and computational extensions to DEA. J Prod Anal 11:275–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Maeda Y, Sekitani K, Shi J (2014a) Input-output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least-distance DEA measures. Eur J Oper Res 237:997–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Masaki H, Sekitani K, Shi J (2014b) Distance optimization approach to ratio-form efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 42:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, Hougaard JL, Sekitani K, Shi J (2016) Efficiency measurement with a nonconvex free disposal hull technology. J Oper Res Soc (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • González E, Alvarez A (2001) From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: the choice of a relevant benchmark. Eur J Oper Res 133:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González M, López-Espín JJ, Aparicio J, Giménez D, Pastor JT (2015) Using genetic algorithms for maximizing technical efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Procedia Comput Sci 51(2015):374–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González M, López-Espín JJ, Aparicio J, Gimenéz D (2016) Implementing the principle of least action in data envelopment analysis: a parameterized scheme of metaheuristics. Working Paper, University Miguel Hernandez of Elche

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Zohrehbandian M (2005) Finding the piecewise linear frontier production function in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 163:483–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Rezai HZ, Balf FR (2007) Finding strong defining hyperplanes of production possibility set. Eur J Oper Res 177:42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Vakili J, Mirdehghan SM (2012) Using the minimum distance of DMUs from the frontier of the PPS for evaluating group performance of DMUs in DEA. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 29(2):1250010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Espín JJ, Aparicio J, Giménez D, Pastor JT (2014) Benchmarking and data envelopment analysis. An approach based on metaheuristics. Procedia Comput Sci 29:390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S, Villa G (2005) Determining a sequence of targets in DEA. J Oper Res Soc 56:1439–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor JT, Aparicio J (2010) The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the least-distance measure: comment. Math Comput Model 52:397–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor JT, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115:596–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela MCS, Borges PC, Thanassoulis E (2003) Finding closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: the case of convex and non-convex technologies. J Prod Anal 19:251–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Operations Research, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche, Alicante, Spain

    Juan Aparicio, Martin Gonzalez, Jose J. Lopez-Espin & Jesus T. Pastor

Authors
  1. Juan Aparicio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jose J. Lopez-Espin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jesus T. Pastor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Aparicio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Operations Research, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Alicante, Spain

    Juan Aparicio

  2. CEPA, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    C. A. Knox Lovell

  3. Center of Operations Research, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Alicante, Spain

    Jesus T. Pastor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aparicio, J., Gonzalez, M., Lopez-Espin, J.J., Pastor, J.T. (2016). A Parameterized Scheme of Metaheuristics to Solve NP-Hard Problems in Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Aparicio, J., Lovell, C., Pastor, J. (eds) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 249. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48461-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation