Skip to main content

On Measuring Technological Possibilities by Hypervolumes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 249))

Abstract

Measuring technological possibilities is a somewhat neglected topic in the productivity analysis literature. We discuss existing methods as well as an obvious alternative measure based on hypervolumes. We illustrate the use of a volume-based measure on an empirical case of demolition projects from two different companies and suggest ways of overcoming some issues related to the practical implementation. Finally, we discuss pros and cons of the various approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The fact that observation \( b_{2} \) is a dominated boundary point is not of importance here—it could have been strongly efficient as well. The example is chosen such as to make our argument as simple and clear as possible.

References

  • Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 39:1261–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Pastor JT, Zofio JL (2013) On the inconsistency of the Malmquist-Luenberger index. Eur J Oper Res 229(3):738–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Tam F (2007) Estimating global frontier shifts and global Malmquist indices. J Prod Anal 27:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader J, Zitzler E (2011) HypE: an algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization. Evol Comput 19:45–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber CB, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa HT (1996) The quick-hull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans Math Softw 22:469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Kerstens K (2009) Infeasibility and directional distance functions with application of determinateness of the Luenberger productivity indicator. J Optim Theory Appl 141:55C73

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocket PL, Golany B (1996) Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 42:466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camanho AS, Dyson RG (2006) Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring group performance. J Prod Anal 26:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1981) Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Manage Sci 27:668–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Weiss MA, Zi H (1999) Organizational form and efficiency: the coexistence of stock and mutual property-liability insurers. Manage Sci 45:1254–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1994) Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM (eds) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Russell RR (eds) (1998) Index numbers: essays in honor of Sten Malmquist. Kluwer-Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A III:253–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer M (2002) The measure of Pareto optima: application of multiobjective metaheuristics. CSHCN Technical Report 2002–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles JD, Corne DW (2003) Properties of an adaptive archiving algorithm for storing nondominated vectors. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7:100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm S-Ch (2010) On real economic freedom. Soc Choice Welfare 35:351–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaglio E, Vannucci S (2009) On the volume-ranking of opportunity sets in economic environments. Soc Choice Welfare 33:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao J, Tu D (1995) The jackknife and bootstrap. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mette Asmild .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asmild, M., Hougaard, J.L. (2016). On Measuring Technological Possibilities by Hypervolumes. In: Aparicio, J., Lovell, C., Pastor, J. (eds) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 249. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48461-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics