Skip to main content

Evolution of Trade Globalization from 2003 to 2014: Weakening Dynamics of World Trade Confirms Globalization Postulates

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Applied Economic Research

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 1749 Accesses

Abstract

This paper measures the globalization degree of physical trade flows based on WTO figures from 2003 to 2014. The paper is an annual update of former presented papers representing a long-term study analyzing the evolution of the globalization phenomenon. The entropy-based metrics used to compute the interweavement of trade flows is based on a Boltzmann derived concept of entropy, i.e., the higher the order (high inequality) the lower the entropy, leading to a new defined statistical entropy. Translated to economy: the higher the inequality (high concentration of flows) the lower the entropy, i.e., the lower the globalization degree resulting in a higher risk of the economic system. Former papers have shown that economic world trade, as a whole, has been globalizing during recent years but with different patterns: de-globalizing for advanced economic regions, such as North America and Europe, and globalizing for emerging economic regions. Furthermore, it shows that globalization or de-globalization, intended as interweavement of flows, is not a result of the absolute trade volume but of the growth rate of trade volume. The Globalization Trade Model with globalization type 1a of commodities, globalization type 1b of specialties, and opportunistic low-cost globalization type 1c gives an explanation for the different regional evolutions. At the beginning of economic development, globalization is governed by the H-O resource endowment trade logic complying with complementary needs of economic regions, spreading trade flows to new destinations, whereas advanced economies are concentrating on preferential destinations, following Linder’s trade model based on similar consumption patterns. However, after the financial crisis of 2008, during the last years, the evolution of world trade has been stagnating. Is the globalization of trade coming to an end? The aggregated result seems to confirm inverse Kuznets evolution of globalization, explainable with the Central Theorem of Globalization and the Maximizing-Value-Net-of-Risk globalization logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Battiston S et al (2006) Effects of globalization in a model of production networks embedded in geographical space. ETH working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli M (2006) On the nature of globalization and its measurement, UNU-CRIS occasional papers. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, O-2006/3

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38(10):1091–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A et al (2010) Measuring globalization—opening the black box. a critical analysis of globalization indices. J Globalization Stud 1(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagiolo G (2012) The international trade network: statistical properties and modeling. In: Latsis Symposium, ETH Zurich, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielli A (2012) Clustering and ranking countries and their products: a network analysis. ECT-Conference, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallegati M et al (2008) The asymmetric effect of diffusion processes: risk sharing and contagion. Glob Econ J 8(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P, Altman S (2013) Depth index of globalization—and the big shift to emerging economies. Pankaj Ghemawat/IESE Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Karunaratne N (2012) The globalization-deglobalization policy conundrum. Mod Econ 3:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer A, Degain C (2010) Globalization and trade flows: what you see is not what you get. WTO working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietronero L et al (2013) New metrics for economic complexity: measuring the intangible growth potential of countries. Conference at Institute for New Economic Thinking, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruettimann B (2009) Modelling economic globalization—the basic globalization types. In: Global studies association conference, Royal Holloway University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruettimann B (2011a) A comprehensive globalization model to analyze industry logics: the seven economic globalization types, ICOAE 2011, Perugia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruettimann B (2011b) An entropy-based inequality risk metric to measure economic globalization, 1st Conference on Spatial Statistics, University of Twente, Nederland, Elsevier. Proc Environ Sci 3:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruettimann B (2012) Measuring spatial extension of economic globalization, ICOAE 2011, University of Perugia, Italy. J Euro Econ 11(7):509–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2007) Modeling economic globalization—a post-neoclassic view on foreign trade and competition. edited by MV-Wissenschaft, Münster, ISBN 978-3-86582-447-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2008a) Which globalization for the aluminium industry—a normative analysis exploring alternative business models. ALUMINIUM 1/2 and 3 2008, Giesel Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2008b) Which globalization for the aluminium industry. In: Proceedings of the ALUMINIUM 2008 Congress in Essen, organised by DGM, German Metallurgical Association, 23–25 September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2010a) Measuring economic globalization: entropy-based inequality risk metric, Europa regionum, TOM XIII, ROK 2010. University of Stettin, Poland, pp 7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2010b) Globalisierung verstehen heisst Märkte beherrschen—Wie man durch analyse der Geschäfts- und Industrielogik ein normatives Modell der Globalisierungsformen erhält. iO new Management 5/2010. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2011c) Werden die chinesischen Halbzeugexporte die Märkte überfluten?, DOW JONES NE Metalle Monitor, Nr.1/2011, Dow Jones News

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2013) World trade and associated systems risk of global inequality: empiric study of globalization evolution between 2003–2011 and regional pattern analysis, ICOAE 2013, Istanbul, Turkey, proceedings published by Elsevier. Proc Econ Finance 5:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2014a) World trade logics and measure of global inequality: regional pattern and globalization evolution between 2003–2012. Open J Appl Sci 4(4):184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2014b) Modeling financial type 2b globalization and its repercussion on the real economy. Paper presented at ICOAE 2014, Chania, 3–5 July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2015) Measuring the globalization degree of trade from 2003–2013: is globalization of economy coming to an end? ATINER’s conference paper series, FIN2015-1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann B (2016) Modeling financial type 2b globalization and its effects on trade, investments, and unemployment. Int J. Comput Econ Econ 6(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (2004) Capital-market liberalization, globalization, and the IMF. Econ Pol 20(1)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno G. Rüttimann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1 World trade matrix (in b$) with inequalities and risk measures for the year 2014
Table A2 Evolution of supplies and risks during 2003–2014 for different macro-economic regions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rüttimann, B.G. (2017). Evolution of Trade Globalization from 2003 to 2014: Weakening Dynamics of World Trade Confirms Globalization Postulates. In: Tsounis, N., Vlachvei, A. (eds) Advances in Applied Economic Research. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48454-9_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics