Abstract
In the recent economic discussion we observe more and more the use of so-called triangles or trinities of mutual exclusive options which at list pose trilemmas. The start was made with very famous impossible trinity, which nurtured generation of economists. After that came the so-called blessed and unblessed trinities, the peso and the dollarization trinity. With the appearance of the crises occurred diverse financial trinities, new trilemmas, monetary union trilemmas, and last but not least political economic and international trilemmas. Trinities have been used in the field of the monetary policy and exchange rate arrangements, in the international financial sector, in the Euro zone crisis, in the European banking union discussion, and in the field of the political economy. There are many trinities which entail many important trilemmas which make our life difficult. We believe, it is time to look at those triangles or trinities as a single unity, as a single methodology. We would like to understand their meaning, to investigate them systematically, to see if they are related together, last but not least we would like to discover the real message they are trying to convey. In order to do that, we classified the trilemmas in four groups, the first, second, and third generation trilemmas and as fourth group the political economy trilemmas. Our classification is not based on econometrics or other statistical methods. It is based on intuition and simple experience on how the financial sector was developed in the last decades. We must note that we will not consider all the possible trinities which have appeared occasionally but the most important. Therefore, after the introduction, in the first part of the paper we discuss the “first generation” of the trinities, those from the field of the international monetary and exchange rate theory, where we start with the classical impossible trinity, which seems to be the first one used in this kind of “methodology” and we continue with the “blessed and unblessed,” peso and dollarization trinities. In the second part we discuss the “second generation” of the trinities, those of the field of the international financial market, where we discuss the international financial trinity and holy trinity. In the third part of the paper, we investigate the “third generation” trinities, those that have been used to discuss the situation in the Euro zone after the crisis and we start with triangle with a new impossible trinity, the financial/fiscal trinity and the monetary trinity for EMU. In the fourth part of our paper, we discuss the triangles which are used in the field of the political economy and the international relation where we discuss a number of political trinities. Using this simple “methodology” we do not discover a “hidden” theory. No they don’t carry a “new theory” but they carry some strong message. From the theoretical point of view all the trinities are not very dissimilar to each other and nearly every one carry the same message, i.e., the importance of the monetary and financial sector and the problem the trilemmas express always has to do with the way the monetary and financial sector is combined with the others sectors in the economy. From the praxis point of view we discovered that the trinities should not be interpreted strictly because politicians and the authorities use the degree of freedom they have to choose the degree of capital transactions openness, the degree of exchange rate flexibility and that of the monetary independence?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the following these three terms would be used interchangeably with same meaning if nothing else is mentioned.
- 2.
Trilemmas are not to mix with the trixotomes, which are triples as well, but they do not need to pose mutually exclusive alternatives.
- 3.
In the following reference, when we use the simple words of triangle or trinity without stating something else, we mean a triangle or a trinity, which pose trilemmas.
- 4.
It is interesting to know who used first the construction of the impossible trinity. We conclude from the paper by Thomas Palley with a title “Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls” that the person, who used first the construction of the impossible trinity was Paul Krugman (Palley 2009, p. 16). Obstfeld and Taylor in their book “Global Capital Markets: Intergration, Crisis, and Growth” say that they use the construction of the impossible trinity after an idea of Padoa-Schioppa, who used a square to discuss the situation of the European Community (Obstfeld and Taylor 2005 p. 29).
- 5.
The impossible trinity, as it is well known, is very often used to explain the different monetary systems in the history of the world, asserting that the gold standard is a combination of fixed exchange rate and free capital movement without the using of an independent monetary policy, while the Bretton Woods system is a combination of a fixed exchange rate with an independent monetary policy and capital controls, where the today “non system” is a combination of free capital movement, independent monetary policy and flexible instead fixed exchange rates (see Fig. A.1).
- 6.
The New Open Macroeconomic Models, which consider price rigidities and monopolistic competition, show policy dynamics quite different from those built in the Mundell-Fleming tradition (Subbarao 2012).
- 7.
The empirical evidence is not very supportive to the case of the capital mobility because there was not found clear evidence to the thesis that the capital mobility increases growth. Most of the empirical works do not find a direct effect of the free capital mobility on growth, but an indirect effect is actualized, as far as capital mobility has collateral effects fostering technology transfer, trade, and Foreign Direct Investment (Palley 2009, p. 20, Kose et al. 2006).
- 8.
Original sin is a term which was used by Eichengreen et al. (2005a, b) in order to describe a situation where a country cannot issue debt in the international financial market denominated in their own currency and therefore uses debt denominated in an international recognized currency with the result to end up in a currency mix situation. Under the original sin suffer usually the emerging markets, the developing, and the poor countries. According to the authors this unfavorable situation can be only overcame through the international help and the development of the special bond market.
- 9.
M Goldstein and P. Turner (Goldstein 2002, Goldstein and Turner 2004) differentiate between the original sin and currency mix. In their opinion the currency mix situation is a situation where countries use different currencies because of original sin and others reasons but a situation which the countries by themselves can solve and do not need the help of the international community.
- 10.
The Bank for International Settlement estimated that in the year 1998 on average 1, 2 billion dollar per day were exchanged in the international capital market (Casper 2002, p.).
- 11.
Laeven and Valencia (2008) accounted 124 banking, 208 currency, and 63 sovereign debt crisis for the period 1970–2007.
- 12.
This thesis is “challenged” again by Georgiadis and Mehl (2015), who assert that a part of the financial accelerator channel, which expresses the influence of global cycle, one has to consider the exchange rate channel, the valuation’s effects of the exchange rates change on the net long position of the countries. Measuring the effectiveness of the monetary policy in a number of developed countries, they found that the exchange rate channel had significant effects on the input of these countries and therefore they concluded that even though flexible exchange rate doesn’t isolate the country from abroad, they still play a role as far as they effect the monetary policy through the exchange rate channel.
- 13.
See the First Generation Trinities part of this essay.
- 14.
The article states following: “The Union shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of any Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project. A Member State shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of another Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project” (Pisani Ferry, 2012, p. 4).
- 15.
This clause is called as well the no bailout clause (Pisani Ferry, 2012, p. 12).
- 16.
The article states “Overdraft facilities or any other type of credit facility with the European Central Bank or with the central banks of the Member States (hereinafter referred to as ‘national central banks’) in favor of Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of Member States shall be prohibited, as shall the purchase directly from them by the European Central Bank or national central banks of debt instruments” (Pisani Ferry 2012, p. 5).
- 17.
With the expression “bank sovereign interdependence” the author means that time existent situation in the banking sector, where the single state was responsible for the regulation, supervision and survival, or recapitalization in case of bankruptcies, thus the banks were relatively active overall in Europe, and they had relative big amounts of governments bonds (Pisani Ferry 2012, p. 6).
- 18.
As it is already known, Europe is in a phase of strong procedural changes. There is a variety of proposals. A large number have been included in the proposals of the five presidents of EU. Taking into account the proposals of the presidents, one can express the view that the EMU is directed towards the solution of the banking union as far as the clauses of no co-responsibility and no financing remain in power.
- 19.
Optimal Currency Theory is developed by Mundell, McKinnon, Kenen, and others and examines whether a geographical area is an optimal area for a single currency. In other words, it is a theory, which investigates how far countries could or should participate to monetary union, how far countries could or should choose a fixed exchange rate system. Unlike the others traditional theories, which focus on the exchange rate as an adjustment mechanism, OCA concentrates on alternatives to exchange rate mechanism, like the geographical mobility of workers, size of the area, concentration, diversification, etc (Mongelli 2002, 2008).
- 20.
- 21.
Many analysts do not believe that solving the monetary union trilemma will be enough. For example, Bibow (2013a, b, 2014, 2015a, b) asserts that EMU must proceeds much farther than solving simply the monetary union trilemma and implement a real fiscal union by establishing a union treasury, which will back the lender of last resort function of the European Central Bank and give the Euro the legitimate power to become a currency of “European Nation,” the power of sovereign state. As he put it “the current regime (in the EMU added) leaves all players vulnerable. Lacking a central bank partner, the national treasuries are subject to default and, hence, runs. Lacking a Euro Treasury partner and Euro Treasury debt, the ECB is subject to legal challenges of its quasi-fiscal policies as applied to national debts.”
- 22.
This must, of course, not be truth, but we cannot deal with such issues in the present work. Issues of democratic legitimacy, for example, of the European Semester or the European Stability Mechanism are beyond our subject, and for this reason they are no further examined.
References
Aizenman J (2010) The impossible trinity (aka The Policy Trilemma). The Encyclopedia of Financial Globalization
Aizenman J, Chinn MD, Ito J (2010) The emerging global financial architecture: tracing and evaluating the new patterns of the Trilemma's configuration. J Int Money Financ 29(4):615–641
Aizenman J, Chinn MD, Ito J (2011) Surfing the waves of globalisation: Asia and financial globalisation in the context of Trilemma. J Jpn Int Econ 25(3):290–320
Aizenman J, Ito J (2012) Trilemmas policy convergence patterns and output volatility. North Am J Econ Financ 23(3):261–285
Aizenman J, Ito J (2013) Living with Trilemma constraint: relative Trilemma policy divergence crises and output losses for developing countries. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 19448
Aizenman J, Chinn MD, Ito J (2013) The impossible trinity hypothesis in an era of global imbalance: measurement and testing. Rev Int Econ 21(3):445–458
Aizenman J, Chinn MD (2012) Trilemma policy convergence patterns and output volatility. NBER Working Paper 17806
Aizenman J, Chinn MD (2015) Monetary policy spillovers and the trilemma in the new normal: periphery country sensitivity to core country conditions. NBER Working Paper 21128
Beck H, Prinz A (2012) The trilemma of a monetary union: another impossible trinity. Intereconomics 47(1):39–43
Bibow J (2013a) Germany and the Euroland crisis. Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No 767
Bibow J (2013b) On the Franco-German Euro contradiction and ultimate euro battleground. Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper 762
Bibow J (2014) The Euro treasure plan. Levy Economics Institute, Public Policy Brief No 135
Bibow J (2015a) The Euro’s savior? Assessing the ECB’s crisis management performance and potential for crisis resolution. Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No 845
Bibow J (2015b) Making the Euro viable: the Euro treasury plan. Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper No 842
Bordo M, James H (2015) Capital Flows and Domestics and International Order: Trilemmas fro Macroeconomics to Political Economy and International Relation. voxeu.org, April 06
Casper R (2002) Zahlungsbilanz und wechelkurse. Verlag Oldenburg, Oldenburg
Calvo AG (1999) Fixed versus flexible exchange rates. Deparment of Economics, University of Mariland, College Park
Calvo AG (2001) Economic policy in stormy waters: fiinancial vulnerability in emerging economies. J Appl Econ IV:1–25
Calvo AG (2003) The mirage of exchange rate regimes for emerging market economies. National Bureau of Economic Research
Calvo G (2005) Fixed versus Floating Exchange Rates., από http://bsos.und.edu/econ/ciecalvo/html: http://bsos.und.edu/econ/ciecalvo/html. Retrievied 30 June 2009
De la Tore A, Levy-Yeyati E, Schmukler S (2002) Financial globalisation: unequal blessings. The World Bank Lating America and the Caribbean Region Office of the Chief Economist. Policy Research Working Paper 29903
De Grauwe P (2003) Tα Oικoνoμικά της Noμισματικής Ένωσης. Παπαζήσης, Aθήνα
Eichengreen B, Hausmann R, Panizza U (2005a) The mystery of original sin. In Eichengreen B, Hausmann R (eds) Others people money: debt denomination and financial instability in emerging markets economies. Chicago University Press, Chicago and London, pp. 233–265
Eichengreen B, Hausmann R, Panizza U (2005b) The pain of original sin. In Eichegreen B, Hausmann R (eds) Others people money: debt, denomination and financial instability in emerging markets economies. Chicago University Press, Chicago and London
Frankel J (1999) No single currency regime is right for all countries. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Papers 7238
Fisher S (2001) Distinguished lecture on economic in government exchange rate regimes: is the Bipolar view correct? J Econ Perspect 15(2):3–24
Georgiadis G, Mehl A (2015) Trilemma, not dilemma: globalisation and monetary policy effectiveness. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Globalisation and Monetary Policy Institute, Working Paper No 222
Goldstein M (2002) Management floating plus. Institute of International Economics. iie.com/book-store/342.html [retrieved 04/12/2007]
Goldstein M, Turner P (2004) Controlling currency mismatching in emerging markets. Institute of International Economics. iie.com/bool-store/342.html [retrieved 04/12/2007]
Klein M, Schambaugh J (2013) Is there a dilemma with the trilemma? voxeu.ogr, September 27
Kose M, Prasad E, Rogoff K, Wies J (2006) Financial globalisation: a reappraisal. IMF WP/06/189
Krugman P (1999) O Canada: a neglected nation gets its noble. State Magazine, October 19
Laeven L, Valencia F (2008) Systemic crisis: a new database. IMF WP/08/24
Mongelli F (2002) “New” views on the optimum currency area theory: what is EMU telling us. European Central Bank, WP No 138
Mongelli F (2008) European economic and monetary integration and the optimum currency area theory. Economic Papers 302
O’Rourke K (2011) Monetary Union is a failure. https://twistedecontwist/wordpress.com
Obstfeld M (2013) Finance at centre stage: some lessons of the Euro crisis. Economic Papers 493, April/2013
Obstfeld M (2015) Trilemmas and Trade-Offs: Living with the Trilemmas?
Obstfeld M, Krugman P (2011) Διεθνή Oικoνoμική Θεωρία: Θεωρία και Πoλιτική. Tόμoς B. Eκδόσεις Kριτική, Aθήνα
Obstfeld M, Taylor A (2005) Global capital markets: crisis and growth p. 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Obstfeld M, Schambaugh J, Taylor A (2004) The trilemma in history: tradeoffs among exchange rates monetary policies, and capital mobility. NBER Working Papers 10396
Palley T (2009) Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls. Braz J Polit Econ 29(3)(115):15–34
Pisani Ferry J (2012) The Euro crisis and new impossible trinity. Bruegel Policy Contribution Issue, 01/2012
Rey H (2013) Dilemma not trilemma: the global financial cycle and monetary policy independence. NBER Working Paper 21162
Rey H (2015) International channels of transmission of monetary policy and the mundellian trilemma. In: 15th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, November 13–14
Rodrik D (2010) How far will international economic integration go? Econ Persp 14(1):177–186
Rodrik D (2012a) Globalization dilemmas & and the way out. Indian J Ind Relat 47(3)
Rodrik D (2012b) To Παράδoξo της Παγκoσμιoπoίησης: H Δημoκρατία και τo Mέλλoν της Παγκόσμιας Oικoνoμίας. Kριτική, Aθήνα p.285
Subbarao D (2012) Price stability, financial stability and sovereign debt sustainability. Policy challenge from the new trilemma. In: Second International Research Conference of the Reserve Bank of India an Mumbai on February 1. 2012. Mumbai.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siskou, T. (2017). Trinities in Political Economy: More Than Just a Way of Observation. In: Tsounis, N., Vlachvei, A. (eds) Advances in Applied Economic Research. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48454-9_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48454-9_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48453-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48454-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)