Advertisement

A Partial Ordering Mereology for Non-traditional Three-Dimensional Art

  • Paul M. W. HackettEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

In this section of the research, I use POSA to facilitate more thorough comments upon how we perceive and understand three-dimensional abstract art. In my exposition of POSA, I take some time to delve into previous uses of the approach to reveal partial ordering of variables. I present examples of POSA’s previous theoretical deployment and I demonstrate its application using applied art-related examples. Specifically, in the chapter, I consider a partially ordered model of the eight characteristics from Crowther’s ontology. I assert the usefulness of POSA by referencing how I have used this approach  in earlier research that incorporated Crowther’s characteristics within a mapping sentence which I analysed using POSA to facilitate greater understanding of two-dimensional abstract art. I conclude the chapter by considering how the mapping sentence models I have developed for two and three-dimensional art, and partial order analysis of facets from the mapping sentences for two and three-dimensional art, relate to each other.

Keywords

Partial Order Scalogram Analysis (POSA) Crowther Ontology Three-dimensional art Abstract art Mapping sentence Facet theory 

References

  1. Bruggemann R, Patil GP (2011) Ranking and prioritization for multi-indicator systems: introduction to partial order applications (Environmental and ecological statistics). New York, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  2. Crowther P (2007) Defining art, creating the canon: artistic value in an era of doubt. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guttman L (1991) Louis Guttman in memoriam: Chapters from an unfinished textbook on facet theory. The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  4. Hackett PMW (2016) Psychology and philosophy of abstract art: neuro-aesthetics, perception and comprehension. Palgrave, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Krauss R (1979) Sculpture in the expanded field. October 8:30–44Google Scholar
  6. Patil G, Taillie C (2004) Multiple indicators, partially ordered sets, and linear extensions: multicriterion ranking and prioritization. Environ Ecol Stat 11:199–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Raveh A, Landau S (1993) Partial order scalogram analysis with base coordinates (POSAC): its application to crime patterns in all the states in the United States. J Quant Criminol, 9(1):83–99Google Scholar
  8. Shye S, Amar R (1985) Partial-order scalogram analysis by base coordinates and lattice mapping of the items by their scalogram roles. In: Canter D (ed) Facet theory: approaches to social research. Springer, New York, pp 277–298Google Scholar
  9. Zvulun E (1978) Multidimensional scalogram analysis: the method and its application. In: Shye S (ed) Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, Jossey BassGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CommunicationEmerson CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations