Skip to main content

The Role of Decomposer Animals in Bioremediation of Soils

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioremediation and Sustainable Technologies for Cleaner Environment

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

Abstract

Soil animals are useful indicators of soil contamination, both before and after the bioremediation. Many toxicity and bioavailability assessment methods utilizing soil animals have been developed for hazard and risk-assessment procedures. Not only the survival of the animals, but also more sensitive parameters like growth, reproduction and community structure have often been taken into account in the assessment. Microorganisms are degrading the contaminants in bioremediation processes, soil animals can also have an important but usually an indirect role in these processes. Soil animals, especially the large ones, can also actively take part in the ecological recovery processes through their own activity. The potential risk of transfer of contaminants accumulated in soil animals to the above-ground food webs should be borne in mind. Earthworms are one of the most important soil animal’s which plays a role in bioremediation of soil for cleaner environment due to their biological, chemical and physical actions. Earthworms can be directly employed within bioremediation strategies to promote biodegradation of organic contaminants. Earthworms have been shown to aerate and bioturbate soils and improve their nutritional status and fertility, which are variables known to limit bioremediation. Earthworms have also been shown to retard the binding of organic contaminants in soils, release previously soil-bound contaminants for subsequent degradation, and promote and disperse organic contaminant degrading microorganisms. This review discusses the earthworm actions upon the soil environment and how they might influence the fate and behaviour of soil associated organic contaminants, subsequently improving bioremediation potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amosse J, Turberg P, Kohler-Milleret R, Gobat J, Le Bayon R (2015) Effects of endogeic earthworms on the soil organic matter dynamics and the soil structure in urban and alluvial soil materials. Geoderma 243–244:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barois I, Villemin G, Lavelle P, Toutain F (1993) Transformation of the soil structure through Pontoscolex corethrurus (Oligochaeta) intestinal tract. Geoderma 56:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhadauria T, Ramakrishnan PS (1989) Earthworm population dynamics and contribution to nutrient cycling during cropping and fallow phases of shifting agriculture in north east. Ind J Appl Ecol 26:505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolan NS, Baskaran S (1996) Characteristics of earthworm casts affecting herbicide sorption and movement. Biol Fertil Soils 22:367–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GB, Doube BM (2004) In: Edwards CA (ed) Earthworm Ecology, 2nd edn. Boca

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan C, Linder G (1992) Assessment of contaminated soils using earthworm test procedures. In: Greig-Smith P, Becker H, Edwards P, Heimbach F (eds) Ecotoxicology of earthworms. Intercept, Andover, UK, pp 187–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez J (2004) In: Edwards CA (ed) Earthworm Ecology. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards C (1998) The use of earthworms in the breakdown and management of organic wastes. In: Edwards C. (ed) Earthworm ecology. St. Lucie, Boca Raton, FL, pp 327–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Bohlen CJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms, 3rd edn. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Farenhorst A, Topp E, Bowman BT, Tomlin AD, Bryan RB (2001) Sorption of atrazine and metolachlor by burrow linings developed in soils with different crop residues at the surface. J Environ Sci Health 36(4):389–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gevao B, Mordaunt C, Semple KT, Piearce TG, Jones KC (2001) Bioavailability of nonextractable (bound) pesticide residues to earthworms. Environ Sci Technol 35:501–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haimi J, Huhta V (1986) Capacity of various organic residues to support adequate earthworm biomass for vermicomposting. Biol Fertil Soils 2:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimi J, Huhta V (1987) Comparison of composts produced from identical wastes by “vermistabilization” and conventional composting. Pedobiologia 30:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzshmar A (2004). In: Edwards CA (ed) Earthworm ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida pp 201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalthanzara H, Ramanujam SN, Jha LK (2011) Population dynamics of earthworm in relation to soil physico-chemical parameters in agroforestry systems if Mizoram. India J Environ Biol 32:599–605

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A (1991) Short- and long-term effects of the endogeic earthworm Millsoniaanomala (Omodeo) (Megascolecidæ, Oligochæta) of tropical savannas, on soil organic matter. Biol Fertil Soils 11(3):234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meharg AA (1996) Bioavailability of atrazine to soil microbes in the presence of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestrius. Soil Biol Biochem 28(4/5):555–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan AJ (1986) Calcium-lead interactions involving earthworms: a hypothesis. Chem Ecol 2:251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard P, Lin J, Mueller J, Shields M (1996) Bioremediation research in EPA: an overview of needs, directions, and potentials. In: Hickey R, Smith G (eds) Biotechnology in Industrial Waste Treatment and Bioremediation. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajkhowa DJ, Bhattacharyya PN, Sarma AK, Mahanta K (2015) Diversity and distribution of Earthworms in different soil habitats of Assam, North-East India, an Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspots. In: Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, India section B: biological sciences 85(2):389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1987) Microbial activity and nutrient dynamics in earthworm casts (Lumbricidae). Biol Fertil Soils 5:230–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Prakash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prakash, S., Selvaraju, M., Ravikumar, K., Punnagaiarasi, A. (2017). The Role of Decomposer Animals in Bioremediation of Soils. In: Prashanthi, M., Sundaram, R., Jeyaseelan, A., Kaliannan, T. (eds) Bioremediation and Sustainable Technologies for Cleaner Environment. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48439-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics