Skip to main content

Paradigm Shift by Straight Wire Appliance and Its Impact on Anchorage Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Physiologic Anchorage Control

Abstract

Classical anchorage like in Tweed Edgewise and Begg technique all includes tip back bends on molars. With the development of straight wire appliance, especially the wide spread of NiTi wire that makes bending tip backs impractical if not impossible, orthodontists then gradually discard tip back bend and look for other anchorage methods. We then see a lot of TPA, Nance bar, headgear, and more and more TAD. Our recent study showed the conventional headgear can’t prevent upper molar from forward tipping on straight wire technique probably because it can’t resist 24 hours tip forward moment exerted by a straight wire on conventional molar tube when the dental arch was not straight before treatment. TAD is absolute anchorage; it won’t yield at all when pitting with other teeth. Then we see a lot of alveolar defects or root resorption of anterior teeth especially with the application of CBCT imaging technology. The emergence of TAD represents the end of the time of ever looking for stronger anchorage and meanwhile the advent of a new time of looking for more individualized and more physiologic anchorage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andrews LF (1972) The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 62(3):296–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulligan TF (1982) Common sense mechanics. 2122 East Kaler Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85020

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burstone CJ, Koenig HA (1974) Force systems from an ideal arch. Am J Orthod 65(3):270–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138(5):544.e1–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martinelli FL, de Oliveira Ruellas AC, de Lima EM, Bolognese AM (2010) Natural changes of the maxillary first molars in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137(6):775–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tweed CH (1966) Clinical orthodontics. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu TM (2015) New concept of physiologic anchorage control. APOS Trends Orthod 5:250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work was supported, in part, by National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81371192.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Min Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xu, T.M. (2017). Paradigm Shift by Straight Wire Appliance and Its Impact on Anchorage Control. In: Xu, T. (eds) Physiologic Anchorage Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48333-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48333-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48331-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48333-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics