Skip to main content

Bringing Authoritative Models to Computational Drama (Encoding Knebel’s Action Analysis)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Storytelling (ICIDS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10045))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Maria Knebel is one of the most influential scholars in the field of Drama Analysis. Her work with Stanislavsky has been foundational in the history of theatre: she devised the method of Action Analysis to read the play as a score of actions to be executed by the actors. This paper aims at encoding Knebel’s principles in a formal representation using a computational ontology (Drammar) to prove its expressiveness and to test its efficacy in a production point of view. As an example we use Knebel’s analysis of Pogodin’s Kremlin Chimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The names of the instances we use here do not entail any specific meaning; they only aim to the comprehensibility of the analysis.

References

  1. Benedetti, J.: Stanislavski and the Actor. Methuen Publishing, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergamo, A.: Introduzione. In: Bergamo, A. (ed.) L’analisi della piece e del ruolo mediante l’azione, pp. 1–28. Ubulibri, Milano (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson, M.: Theories of the Theatre : A Historical and Critical Survey from the Greeks to the Present. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carnicke, S.M.: Stanislavsky in Focus. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dukore, B.F.: Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elson, D.K.: Dramabank: annotating agency in narrative discourse. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gorchakov, N.: Stanislavski Directs. Minerva, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon, M.: The Stanislavsky Technique. Applause, Russia (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon, M.: Stanislavsky in America: An Actor’s Workbook. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knebel, M.: Vsja zizn’. VTO (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knebel, M.: L’analyse par l’action du pièce et du rôle. Actes Sud-Papiers (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knebel, M.: Le verbe dans l’art de l’acteur. Actes Sud-Papiers (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Knebel, M.: L’analisi della pièce e del ruolo mediante l’azione. Ubulibri, Milano (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lombardo, V., Battaglino, C., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R., Lieto, A.: Coupling conceptual modeling and rules for the annotation of dramatic media. Semant. Web J. 6(5), 503–534 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Digital heritage and avatars of stories. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Collaborative Annotations in Shared Environment: Metadata, Vocabularies and Techniques in Digital Humanities, pp. 1–8. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Ontologies for the metadata annotation of stories. In: Digital Heritage. ACM, Marseille (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Multimedia tool suite for visualization of drama heritage metadata. Multimedia Tools Appl. Spec. Issue Multimedia Cult. Heritage 75, 3901–3932 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Ontology–based visualization of characters’ intentions. In: Mitchell, A., Fernández-Vara, C., Thue, D. (eds.) ICIDS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8832, pp. 176–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12337-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R.: Safeguarding and accessing drama as intangible cultural heritage. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Heritage 9(1), 5:1–5:26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R.: WikiDrammar (2016). https://www.di.unito.it/wikidrammar

  21. Mateas, M.: A neo-aristotelian theory of interactive drama (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Merlin, B.: Konstantin Stanislavsky. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mitter, S.: System of Rehearsal. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Peinado, F., Cavazza, M., Pizzi, D.: Revisiting character-based affective storytelling under a narrative BDI framework. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 83–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Peinado, F., Gervás, P.: Evaluation of automatic generation of basic stories. New Gener. Comput. 24(3), 289–302 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pizzo, A.: Neodrammatico Digitale. Accademia University Press, Torino (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Pogodin, N.: Kremlin chimes. In: Three Soviet Plays, pp. 7–89. Foreign Languages Publishing House (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, L., Akagawa, N.: Intangible Heritage. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Stanislavsky, K.: An Actor’s Work: A Student’s Diary. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Stanislavsky, K.: An Actor’s Work on a Role. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stanislavsky, K., Hapgood, E.: An Actor’s Handbook: An Alphabetical Arrangement of Concise Statements on Aspects of Acting. A Theatre Arts book. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Szilas, N.: Idtension: a narrative engine for interactive drama. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE 2003), Darmstadt, Germany (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Szondi, P.: Theory of the moderna drama parts i-ii. boundary 2 11(3), 191–230 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toporkov, V.: Stanislavski in Rehearsal. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vecco, M.: A definition of cultural heritage: from the tangible to the intangible. J. Cult. Heritage 11(3), 321–324 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Albert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albert, G., Pizzo, A., Lombardo, V., Damiano, R., Terzulli, C. (2016). Bringing Authoritative Models to Computational Drama (Encoding Knebel’s Action Analysis). In: Nack, F., Gordon, A. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10045. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48278-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48279-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics