Skip to main content

Abstract

The riser must be adequate to satisfy the liquid and solidification shrinkage requirements of the casting. In addition, the riser itself will be solidifying, so the total shrinkage requirement to be met will be for the riser/casting combination. The total feeding requirement will depend on the specific alloy, the amount of superheat, the casting geometry, and the molding medium. The shape of a casting will affect the size of the riser needed to meet its feed requirements for the obvious reason that the longer the casting takes to solidify, the longer the riser must maintain a reservoir of liquid metal. A variety of methods have been devised to calculate the riser size (shape factor method, geometric method, the modulus method) needed to ensure that liquid feed metal will be available for as long as the solidifying casting requires. In this research has been calculated the riser geometry by different methods for a piece type wheel and the simulation has been used to determine which of the methods it is more efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckermann, C., O. Shouzhu, and K.D. Carlson, Feeding and risering of high-alloy steel castings. Metallurgical and materials transactions B, 2005. 36B(97).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wloadawer, R., Directional Solidification of Steel Castings ed. P. Press. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckermann, C., et al., Development of New Feeding-Distance Rules Using Casting Simulation: Part I. Methodology. Metallurgical and Materials transactions B, 2002. 33B.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tavakoli, R. and P. Davami, Optimal riser design in sand casting process by topology optimization with SIMP method I: Poisson approximation of nonlinear heat transfer equation. Struct Multidisc Optim, 2008. 36: p. 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gunasegaram, D.R. and B.J. Smith. MAGMASOFT helps assure quality in a progressive Australian iron foundry. in 32nd National Convention of the Australian Foundry Institute. 2001. Fremantle, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coello Machado, N.I. and L.H. Suárez Lisca. Casting parts quality improvement using forecast and control process parameters. in 5th International doctoral students workshop on logistics. 2012. Magdeburg, Germany: Prof. Dr. -Ing. habil. Prof. E. h. Dr. h. c. mult. Michael Schenk.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MONTGOMERY, D., Design and analysis of experiments. Fifth Edition. 1997, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lisca, S., Coello, L.H., Machado, N.I. (2013). The Simulation as Prediction Tool to Determine the Method of Riser Calculation More Efficient. In: Li, M., Campbell, C., Thornton, K., Holm, E., Gumbsch, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48194-4_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics