Skip to main content

Additive Manufacturing Supports the Production of Complex Castings

  • Chapter
Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014

Abstract

Additive manufacturing is being used in a variety of ways to support the production of complex castings. Some of the common additive manufacturing processes include fused filament fabrication, vat photopolymerization, powder bed fusion, binder jetting, and material jetting. In this paper, the authors discuss the use of (i) binder jetting technology to fabricate sand molds for casting complex, cellular structures and (ii) fused filament fabrication & vat photopolymerization to produce complex investment casting patterns. Binder jetting of foundry sand molds allows the realization of cast structures that are impossible to mold using conventional methods. The structures are lightweight, multi-functional and may provide exceptional blast protection. With regards to investment casting, wax is currently the primary material used for producing expendable patterns due to a desirable combination of thermal expansion, thermal conductivity and melting point. However, wax is not a typical printed material. A variety of polymers are available for additive manufacturing and, as would be expected, only a few are suitable for use as expendable patterns for investment casting. The best polymers for use as expendable patterns for investment castings are PMMA, epoxy resin containing a reactive diluent and ABS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. “Metalcasting: Who and What Are We?” American Foundry Society presentation, American Foundry Society, Schaumburg, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.T. Pham and R.S. Gault, “A Comparison of Rapid Prototyping Technologies,” Internationaljournal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 38 (1998) pp. 1257–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Grimm, User’s Guide to Rapid Prototyping (Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.I. Noorani, Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.V. Wong and A. Hernandez, “A Review of Additive Manufacturing,” ISRN Mechanical Engineering, Article ID 208760 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.zcorp.com/en/Solutions/Castings-Patterns-Molds/spage.aspx, 3DSystems, 333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, SC 29730.

  7. http://www.exone.com/, ExOne™, 2341 Alger Drive, Troy, MI 48083.

  8. http://www.voxeljet.de/en/, Voxeljet.

  9. D.A. Snelling et al, “Mitigating Gas Defects in Castings Produced from 3D Printed Molds,” 117thMetalcasting Congress Conference Proceedings, St. Louis, MO (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N.A. Meisel, C.B. Williams, and A. Druschitz, “Lightweight Metal Cellular Structures via Indirect 3D Printing and Casting,” International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Snelling et al, “The Effects of 3D Printed Molds on Metal Castings,” International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Mueller, “Guide to Casting Using QuickCast™ Patterns,” 3DSystems, 333 Three D Systems Circle, Rock Hill, SC 29730.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Seals, S. McKinney, and P. Walsh, “Comparison of Wax and 3D Printed Investment Casting Pattern Materials,” Materials Science & Technology 2012 Conference & Exhibition Conference Proceedings, Pittsburg, PA (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.E. Seals et al, “Evaluation of 3D Printed Polymers for Investment Casting Expendable Patterns,” accepted for publication in 118 th Metalcasting Congress Conference Proceedings, Schaumburg, IL (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. VisiJet™ SL Clear MSDS, http://www.3dsystems.com/sites/www.3dsystems.com/files/24672-S02–00-C-MSDS-US-English-VisiJet-SL-Clear.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Druschitz, A., Williams, C., Snelling, D., Seals, M. (2014). Additive Manufacturing Supports the Production of Complex Castings. In: Tiryakioğlu, M., Campbell, J., Byczynski, G. (eds) Shape Casting: 5th International Symposium 2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48130-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics