Skip to main content

Protecting the Sacred in the Finnish Sápmi: Settings and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experiencing and Protecting Sacred Natural Sites of Sámi and other Indigenous Peoples

Part of the book series: Springer Polar Sciences ((SPPS))

Abstract

Sacred sites and places, the knowledge and customs connected to these places, are still of significant importance for Sámi people today. They are part of their cultural identity and as such protected by Finnish law. However, current law systems do often not comply with indigenous peoples’ worldviews in general, and with the Sámi concept of sacred sites in particular. Against this background, this chapter investigates by which legal means Sámi sacred sites are protected nowadays in Finland and discusses related problems based on the Finnish Antiquities Act (295/1963). In doings so, the article gives an overview of the main existing domestic legal instruments for protecting Sámi sacred sites and elaborates, in this context, whether and to what extent Sámi sacred sites are specifically recognized in the respective legal framework. More specifically, the practical implementation of the legal protection of Sámi sacred sites under the Antiquities Act is discussed. Today, there are around 50 registered Sámi sacred sites, recognized as ‘ancient monuments’ under this act. These sacred sites are usually nature formations: mountains, lakes, springs, rocks, boulders or islands. Many challenges and problems exist related to their protection; so for example, the difficulty to identify them without ethnographic, historical, linguistic, archaeological or oral sources, or in general without deeper understanding of the Sámi concept of sacred landscapes. Moreover, questions arise of “How do we recognize a Sámi sacred site?”; “What kind of tools is needed when defining a sacred site and its borders?”; or “How can the Sámi knowledge of sacred places maintained and related information protected against the misuse of outsiders, while at the same time ensuring public access to cultural heritage?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Sámi homeland means, according to Section 4 (1) of the Act on the Sami Parliament (974/ 1995), the areas of the municipalities of Enontekiö, Inari and Utsjoki, as well as the area of the reindeer owners’ association of Lapland in Sodankylä.

  2. 2.

    The National Board of Antiquities, operating under the Ministry of Education and Culture, is responsible for protecting environments with cultural history value, archaeological culture heritage and architectural heritage, and other cultural property. See its webpage at: http://www.nba.fi/en/about_us (accessed 17 May 2016).

  3. 3.

    Access to the register, in Finnish language, at: http://kulttuuriymparisto.nba.fi/netsovellus/rekisteriportaali/portti/default.aspx (accessed 17 May 2016).

  4. 4.

    „Suojelualueiden kulttuuriperintökohteiden inventointi –ohje“, last revised by Metsähallitus in 2013, not publically available.

  5. 5.

    In Finland, protected areas are categorized as: national parks, strict nature reserves, mire reserves, protected herb-rich forests, protected old-growth forest areas, grey seal protection areas, other protected areas on state-owned land and protected areas on private land. Moreover, Finland has a Natura-2000-network in place to conserve important biotopes and species. These protected areas, established by statute, comprise ca. 17.000 km2. Moreover, the Finnish network of protected areas also includes areas which are part of nature conservation programmes (not yet established by statute), and which count in principle to be reserved as protected areas. Taking the latter areas also into account, the total protected area network comprises more than 71.000 km2. http://www.metsa.fi/web/en/numberandsizeofprotectedareas (accessed 23 May 2016).

  6. 6.

    In this sense, wilderness reserves belong also to the “extended” network of protected areas in Finland. They are established in accordance to the Wilderness Act on state lands in Lapland. Currently, there are 12 wilderness areas combining an area of ca. 14.903 km2, http://www.metsa.fi/web/en/wilderness-areas (accessed 23 May 2016).

  7. 7.

    The Hammastunturi wilderness reserve area comprises ca. 184.000 hectares and spans the municipalities of Inari (90 %), Sodankylä (9 %) and Kittilä (1 %). It is situated almost entirely within the Sámi homeland, and used as reindeer pastureland of the Hammastunturi (53 %), Sallivaara (26 %), Ivalo (11 %), Lapland (9 %) and Kuivasalmi (1 %) reindeer herding cooperatives.

  8. 8.

    It should be noted, however, that the Finish language text version of the Land Use and Building Act in Section 5 (1), Nr.3 is somehow weaker by using the expression: „edistää rakennetun ympäristön kauneutta ja kulttuuriarvojen vaalimista“, what means in English language translated: „to promote the appreciation of beauty of the built heritage and cultural values“.

  9. 9.

    In practice, this implies that extra field surveys and researches might be required from the competent authority if the plan does not contain sufficient information about sacred sites in the planning area.

  10. 10.

    The Inari Sámi word ‘Äijih’ can be translated as grandfather, old man or god of thunder, and there are a few known Inari Sámi sacred sites called Äijih around the Inari Lake.

  11. 11.

    Ilmari Mattus, unwritten notification. Holder of traditional Inari Sámi knowledge.

  12. 12.

    The Inari Sámi word ‘Akku’ means old woman or grandmother.

  13. 13.

    Observation of Eija Ojanlatva who took part in the planning process towards the Lake Inari in 2007–2008.

  14. 14.

    Sámi museum Siida is a competent authority of archaeological cultural heritage in the Sámi homestead area according to the joint agreement made with National Board of Antiquities in 2011.

  15. 15.

    Observations and records taken by Eija Ojanlatva during her field studies of many years.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Database at the website of the Swedish National Heritage Board, “Riksantikvarieämbetet”, in Swedish language, http://www.fmis.raa.se/cocoon/fornsok/search.html (accessed 23 May 2016).

References

  • Act on Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure. (468/1994). Unofficial English translation at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1994/en19940468.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Act on the Sami Parliament. (974/1995). Unofficial English translation at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1995/en19950974.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Act on Wilderness Reserves. (62/1991). In Finnish language available at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1991/19910062. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Akwé:Kon Voluntary Guidelines for the Conduct of Cultural, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment regarding Developments Proposed to Take Place on, or which are Likely to Impact on, Sacred Sites and on Lands and Waters Traditionally Occupied or Used by Indigenous and Local Communities. (2004). http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7753. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Antiquities Act. (295/1963). In Finish language available at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1963/19630295. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Broadbent, N. (2010). Lapps and labyrinths: Sámi prehistory, colonization and cultural resilience. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, D., Hubert, J., & Reeves, B. (1994). Introduction. In D. L. Carmichael, J. Hubert, B. Reeves, & A. Schanche (Eds.), Sacred sites, sacred places (pp. 1–8). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpelan, C. (2003). Inarilaisten arkeologiset vaiheet. In V. P. Lehtola (Ed.), Inari – Aanaar, Inarin historia jääkaudesta nykypäivään. Inari: Inarin kunta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution of Finland of. 11 June 1999. Unofficial English translation at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990731.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Council of Europe. (2005). Framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680083746. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Custodian Statement. (2008). A statement of custodians of sacred natural sites, made at the IUCN World Conservation Congress in Barcelona, Spain. http://www.sacredland.org/media/Custodians-Statement-WCC-Barcelona.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Heinämäki, L., Herrmann, T., & Neumann, A. (2014). The protection of the culturally and spiritually important landscapes of Arctic indigenous peoples under the Convention on Biological Diversity and first experiences from the application of the Akwé:Kon Guidelines in Finland. In: G. Alfredsson & T. Koivurova (Eds. in-chief), H. Ó. Ágústsson (special Ed.), The yearbook of polar law (Vol. 6, pp. 189–225). Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, J. (1994). Sacred beliefs and beliefs of sacredness. In D. L. Carmichael, J. Hubert, B. Reeves, & A. Schanche (Eds.), Sacred sites, sacred places (pp. 9–19). London/;New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kylli, R.. (2005). Kirkon ja saamelaisten kohtaaminen Utsjoella ja Inarissa 1742–1886. Pohjois-Suomen historiallinen yhdistys, Societas Historica Finlandiae Septentrionalis, Jyväskylä (Finland), pp. 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Use and Building Act. (132/1999). Unofficial English translation at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990132.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Mattus, I. (2010). Itä-Inarin paikannimistö. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja, Sarja A 186, Metsähallitus: Edita Prima Oy. Helsinki (Finland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metsähallitus. (2013). Final report: Application of Akwé:Kon Guidelines in the Management and Land Use Plan for the Hammastunturi Wilderness Area. http://julkaisut.metsa.fi/assets/pdf/lp/Muut/AkweKonraportti2013.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Miller, C. M. (1998). Protection of indigenous sacred sites and cultural properties in the Americas. Presentation at the natural sacred sites – cultural diversity and biological diversity international symposium, Paris, 22–25 September 1998, Abstracts. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001134/113456mb.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Ministry of Environment. (1995). Ympäristönsuojeluosasto, Työryhmän mieteintö 66/1992, Arvokkaat maisema-alueet: maisema-aluetyöryhmän mietintö I-II. Decision-in-principle of Finnish Government, VNp. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulk, I. M. (1994). Sacrificial places and their meaning in Sámi society. In D. L. Carmichael, J. Hubert, B. Reeves, & A. Schanche (Eds.), Sacred sites, sacred places (pp. 121–131). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Conservation Act. (1096/1996). Unofficial English translation at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1996/en19961096.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2017.

  • Ojanlatva, E. (2013). Saamelaisalueen muinaisjäännöksiä. In E. Ojanlatva & P. Magga (Eds.), Ealli biras - Elävä Ympäristö, Saamelainen kulttuuriympäristöohjelma. Sámi museum – Saamelaismuseosäätiö, Vantaa (Finland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, G., & Jeanrenaud, S. (2007). Protecting sacred natural sites of indigenous and traditional peoples. In J. M. Mallarach & T. Papayannis (Eds.), Protected areas and spirituality. Gland: IUCN/Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, D. (1994). Principles and practice of site protection laws in Australia. In D. L. Carmichael, J. Hubert, B. Reeves, & A. Schanche (Eds.), Sacred sites, sacred places (pp. 227–244). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanche, A. (1994). Introduction: Sacrifical places and their meaning in Sámi society. In D. L. Carmichael, J. Hubert, B. Reeves, & A. Schanche (Eds.), Sacred sites, sacred places (pp. 121–123). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapani, S., & Edgren, H. (2007). Kansallisaarteita kaikille, Museoviraston saavutettavuussuunnitelma, Museovirasto, Yliopistopaino, Helsinki (Finland).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, & ICSU. (2002). Science, traditional knowledge and sustainable development. Paris: ICSU.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McNeely, J., & Gonzalo Oviedo, G. (2010). Sacred natural sites: Conserving nature and culture. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eija Ojanlatva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ojanlatva, E., Neumann, A. (2017). Protecting the Sacred in the Finnish Sápmi: Settings and Challenges. In: Heinämäki, L., Herrmann, T. (eds) Experiencing and Protecting Sacred Natural Sites of Sámi and other Indigenous Peoples. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48069-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics