Skip to main content

From Knowledge to Action: How to Protect Sacred Sites of Indigenous Peoples in the North?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experiencing and Protecting Sacred Natural Sites of Sámi and other Indigenous Peoples

Part of the book series: Springer Polar Sciences ((SPPS))

  • 1143 Accesses

Abstract

By taking into consideration the diverse contributions presented in this book, and by intertwining them with the overall approach presented in our introduction, this concluding chapter aims to summarise key messages and strategies for supporting Sacred Natual Sites (SNSs) and related indigenous cultural heritage. It does so in a form of introducing and analysing the Statement and Recommendations on: “Recognizing and Safeguarding Sacred Sites of Indigenous Peoples in Northern and Arctic Regions” (The Conference Statement hereafter) (Pyhätunturi Statement 2013), which was mentioned in the introduction of this volume. The process of writing the Conference Statement was guided by Bas Verschuuren, who serves as co-Chair of IUCN’s Specialist group on Cultural and Spiritual Values of Protected Areas and is co-founder of the Sacred Natural Sites Initiative, to whom we would like to express a special gratitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Article 40 of the CCPR requires States Parties to submit reports on measures taken to give effect to the rights defined therein. An initial report is to be submitted one year after the state ratifies the CCPR, and further reports are required periodically (normally every 5 years). State reports and the Concluding Observations of the UN Human Rights Committee, http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/6/hrc/hrcs.htm (accessed 5 March 2007). See Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee on Canada UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.105 (1999). Explicit references to either Article 1 or to the notion of self-determination have also been made in the Committee’s Concluding Observations on Mexico, UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.109 (1999); Norway, UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.112 (1999); Australia, UN Doc. CCPR/CO/69/Aus (2000); Denmark, UN Doc. CCPR/CO/70/DNK (2000); Sweden, UN Doc. CCPR/CO/74/SWE (2002); Finland, UN Doc. CCPR/CO/82/FIN (2004); Canada , UN Doc. CCPR/C/CAN/CO/5 (2005); and the United States, UN Doc. CCPR/C/USA/CO/3 (2006) ; ); Concluding observations on the Sixth periodic report of Finland, CCPR/C/FIN/CO/6, 22 August 2013; Concluding Observations on the Seventh Periodic Report of Sweden, CCPR/C/SWE/CO/728 April 2016, paras 38–39; Concluding observations on the Sixth periodic report of Finland, CCPR/C/FIN/CO/6, 22 August 2013; Concluding Observations on the Seventh Periodic Report of Sweden, CCPR/C/SWE/CO/728 April 2016, paras 38–39.

References

  • Åhren, M. (2016). Indigenous peoples’ status in the international legal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alta Outcome Document 2013 Global Indigenous Preparatory Conference for the United Nations High Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly to be known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples, 10–12 June 2013, Alta. http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_news_files/0805_Adopted_Alta_outcome_document_ith_logo_ENG.pdf. Accessed on 10 July 2016.

  • Anaya, J. (2004). Indigenous peoples in international law (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunikowski, D. (2014) Indigenous peoples, their rights and customary laws in the North: The case of the Sámi people. In Lähteenmäki, M., & Colpaert, A. (Eds.), East meets North – Crossing the borders of the Arctic, Nordia Geographical Publications 43:1, Yearbook 2014, Oulu (pp. 75–85). https://wiki.oulu.fi/display/psms/NGP+Yearbook+2014. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  • CESCR Concluding Observations on the Russian Federation, UN doc. E/C.12/1/Add.94, 2003, Paras 11,39., http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/E.C.12.1.Add.94.En?Opendocument. Accessed 19 Jan 2007.

  • CESCR General Comment No. 15, on the Right to Water (ICESCR Arts. 11,12) UN doc. E(C.12/2002/11, at para. 7, http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/comments.htm. Accessed 17 Jan 2007.

  • Daes, E. I. A. (1996). The right of indigenous peoples to “self-determination” in the contemporary world order’. In D. Clark & R. Williamson (Eds.), Self-determination: international perspectives (pp. 47–57). Houndmills: MacMillan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2008). Indigenous struggles in standard-setting: The United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 9(2), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, N., Higgins-Zogib, L., & Mansourian, S. (2009). The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conservation Biology, 23, 568–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinämäki, L. (2013). The Nordic Sámi convention: The right of a people to control issues of importance to them. In N. Bankes & T. Koivurova (Eds.), The proposed Nordic Sámi convention, national and international dimensions of indigenous property rights (pp. 125–147). Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins-Zogib, L. (2008). The spiritual dimension of protected areas: Overlooked and under- valued. In Secretariat of the CBD (Ed.), Protected areas in today’s world: Their values and benefits for the welfare of the planet, Technical series no. 36 (p. 50). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Committee 2009, Communication No. 1457/2006, Doc. CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 of 27 March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T. (2008a). From high hopes to disillusionment: Indigenous peoples’ struggle to (re)gain their right to self-determination. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 15(2008), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T. (2008b) Alkuperäiskansojen itsemääräämisoikeus kansainvälisessä oikeudessa [The right of self-determination of indigenous peoples in international law]. In Aarto, M., & Vartiainen, M. (Eds.), Oikeus kansainvälisessä maailmassa [Law in a changing world] (pp. 249–269). Edita Publishing Oy, Lapin yliopiston oikeustieteiden tiedekunta [The law faculty, the University of Lapland].

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffi, L., & Woodley, E. (Eds.). (2010). Biocultural diversity conservation: A global sourcebook. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poma Poma v. Peru, (2009) UN Human Rights Committee, CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 24 April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyhätunturi Statement (2013) Recognizing and safeguarding sacred sites of indigenous peoples in Northern and Arctic regions. Conference statement and recommendations from the international conference “Protecting the sacred: Recognition of sacred sites of indigenous peoples for sustaining nature and culture in Northern and Arctic regions” held in Pyhätunturi and Rovaniemi, Finland, on 11–13 September 2013., http://sacrednaturalsites.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Pyh%C3%A4tunturi-Statement-2013-Recognizing-Sacred-Sites-of-Indigenous-Peoples-in-Northern-Regions1.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2015.

  • Saramaka People v. Suriname (2007), Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment of November 28, 2007, Series C, No 172.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA 2014 Outcome document of the high-level plenary meeting of the General Assembly known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 22 September 2014, A/RES/69/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vars, L. S. (2009) The Sámi people’s right to self-determination. University of Tromsö.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuuren, B., & Robert, W. (2012). Safeguarding sacred natural sites—Sustaining nature and culture. Langscape, 2 (11), 2012 [online] http://www.terralingua.org/blog/2012/09/06/terralingua-langscape-volume-2-issue-11/. Accessed 25 Mar 2014.

  • Wild, R., & McLeod, C. (2008). Sacred natural sites. Guidelines for protected area managers, Best practice protected area guidelines series no. 16. Gland: IUCN and UNESCO.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xanthaki, A. (2009). Indigenous rights in international law over the last 10 years and future developments. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10(1), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xanthaki, A. (2014). Indigenous Rights at the United Nations: Their impact on international human rights standards. Europa Ethnica, 71(3/4), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leena Heinämäki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heinämäki, L., Herrmann, T.M. (2017). From Knowledge to Action: How to Protect Sacred Sites of Indigenous Peoples in the North?. In: Heinämäki, L., Herrmann, T. (eds) Experiencing and Protecting Sacred Natural Sites of Sámi and other Indigenous Peoples. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48069-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics