The Pittsburgh Girls Study and the Prevalence of Self-Reported Delinquency

  • Rolf Loeber
  • Wesley G. Jennings
  • Lia Ahonen
  • Alex R. Piquero
  • David P. Farrington
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Criminology book series (BRIEFSCRIMINOL)


This chapter reports the yearly follow-ups of the four cohorts of girls in the PGS (n = 2450) in terms of their yearly self-reported delinquency admissions between ages 11 and 19. High cooperation characterized the girls’ participation over the years, with 87 % of the sample being interviewed at age 19. Forty percent of the girls reported engaging in one or more delinquent acts between the ages of 11–19, with serious violence being the most common form of offending. The age–crime curves show that the prevalence of offending gradually increased from age 11 to a peak at age 14–15, and then declined. This applied to moderate and serious violence, while moderate and serious theft peaked at ages 15–16 and then declined. In contrast, the prevalence of drug dealing almost increased almost linearly from age 12 through age 19.


Self-report Offending Age Prevalence Criminal careers 


  1. Ahonen, L., Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Hipwell, A. E., & Stepp, S. D. (in press). What is the hidden figure of delinquency in girls? Scaling up from police charges to self-reports. Victims and Offenders.Google Scholar
  2. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Kosterman, R. (2010). Why are boys more likely to be referred to juvenile court? Gender differences in official and self-reported delinquency. Victims and Offenders, 5, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hipwell, A. E., Loeber, R., Stouthamer Loeber, M., Keenan, K., White, H. R., & Kroneman, L. (2002). Characteristics of girls with early onset disruptive and antisocial behaviour. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 99–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Saner, H., MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P. H. (1995). On the ubiquity of drug selling among youthful offenders in Washington, D.C., 1985–1991: Age, period, or cohort effect? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Stallings, R. (2008). Measurement instruments and constructs. In R. Loeber, D. P. Farrington, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, & H. White (Eds.), Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood (pp. 39–73). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolf Loeber
    • 1
  • Wesley G. Jennings
    • 2
  • Lia Ahonen
    • 1
    • 3
  • Alex R. Piquero
    • 4
  • David P. Farrington
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of CriminologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  4. 4.University of Texas at Dallas Criminology ProgramRichardsonUSA
  5. 5.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations