Connected Bicycles

  • Otto B. PiramuthuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 670)


As IoT (Internet of Things) applications pervade every facet of our lives, it becomes necessary to take stock of the possibilities that include what has already been achieved and what could readily be achieved. We consider a specific facet of IoT applications as they relate to bicycles, specifically the use of IoT in connected bicycles. We discuss current IoT applications in connected bicycles as well as associated dimensions on connected and quantified self. While the concept of quantified self existed without any influence from IoT, the widespread acceptance of IoT and associated convenience have certainly spurred the emergence of IoT-enabled devices that facilitate ease of quantified self data collection. We also identify possible extensions to what already exists in connected bicycles from an IoT-based perspective.


Connected bicycle IoT Quantified self 


  1. ABI Research. The Internet of Things will Drive Wireless Connected Devices to 40.9 Billion in 2020 (2014).
  2. Bales, E., Nikzad, N., Ziftci, C., Quick, N., Griswold, W., Patrick, K.: Personal pollution monitoring: mobile real-time airquality in daily life. Technical report, UCSD Computer Science Department (2014)Google Scholar
  3. Bergström, A., Magnusson, R.: Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transp. Res. Part A 37(8), 649–666 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Bridgelall, R.: Inertial sensor sample rate selection for ride quality measures. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21(2), 04014039:1–04014039:5 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capital Bikeshare: Capital Bikeshare (2014).
  6. Cisco IBSG: The zettabyte era: observation of strains: trends and analysis. White Paper, CISCO Virtual Networking Index, May 2011.
  7. Eckhoff, D., Sommer, C.: Driving for big data? Privacy concerns in vehicular networking. IEEE Secur. Privacy 12(1), 77–79 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Einarsen, B.: 7 in 10 US adults track a health indicator. In: Klick Health (2013).
  9. Gartner: Gartner says it’s the beginning of a new era: the digital industrial economy. In: Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Orlando, 6–10 October (2013).
  10. Hatton, I.A., McCann, K.S., Fryxell, J.M., Davies, T.J., Smerlak, M., Sinclair, A.R.E., Loreau, M.: The predator-prey power law: biomass scaling across terrestrial and aquatic biomes. Science 349(6252), aac6284 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hutchings, E.: Toyota’s ECG steering wheel monitors your heart rate as you drive. In: PSFK Innovation (2011).!bOj0Qx
  12. Kanjo, E., Lanshoff, P.: Mobile phones to monitor pollution. IEEE Distrib. Syst. Online 8(7), art no. 0707–07002 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, S., Prato, C.G.: A spatial analysis of land use and network effects on frequency and severity of cyclist-motorist crashes in the Copenhagen region. Traffic Inj. Prev. 16(7), 724–731 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohler, W.J., Colbert-Taylor, A.: Current law and potential legal issues pertaining to automated, autonomous and connected vehicles. Santa Clara High Tech. Law J. 31(1), 99–138 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. Lindsey, G., Hankey, S., Wang, X., Chen, J., Gorjestani, A.: Feasibility of using GPS to track bicycle lane positioning. Technical report #: CTS 13–16. University of Minnesota, ITS Institute (2013)Google Scholar
  16. McIntyre, A.: Market Trends: Enter the Wearable Electronics Market With Products for the Quantified Self (2014).
  17. Nankervis, M.: The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transp. Res. Part A 33(6), 417–431 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osborne, C.: Beyond Stuxnet and Flame: Equation ‘most advanced’ cybercriminal gang recorded, ZDNet, 16 February 2015.
  19. Peters, J., Bossche, J.V.D., Reggente, M., Poppel, M.V., Baets, B.D., Theunis, J.: Cyclist exposure to UFP and BC on urban routes in Antwerp, Belgium. Atmos. Environ. 92, 31–43 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Piramuthu, O.B., Zhou, W.: Bicycle sharing, social media, and environmental sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-49), pp. 2078–2083. IEEE Computer Society (2016)Google Scholar
  21. Pucher, J., Dijkstra, L.: Making walking and cycling safer: lessons from Europe. Transp. Q. 54(3), 25–50 (2000)Google Scholar
  22. Pucher, J., Buehler, R.: Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. Transp. Rev. 28(4), 495–528 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sadovykh, V.: Decision making in online social networks. MCom thesis, Information Systems, University of Auckland (2011)Google Scholar
  24. Shaheen, S.: Introduction to shared-use mobility: definitions, trends, and understand. In: Shared-Use Mobility Summit. Transportation Sustainability Research Center, UC Berkeley, Washington, D.C. (2014)Google Scholar
  25. van Wee, B., Rietveld, P., Meurs, H.: Is average daily travel time expenditure constant? In search of explanations for an increase in average travel time. J. Transp. Geograph. 14(2), 109–122 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weichenthal, S., Kulka, R., Dubeau, A., Martin, C., Wang, D., Dales, R.: Traffic-related air pollution and acute changes in heart rate variability and respiratory function in urban cyclists. Environ. Health Perspect. 119(10), 1373–1378 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Buchholz High SchoolGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations