Abstract
What are some new methods that researchers are interested in improving the quality of posttraumatic growth should consider? What methods have we used in our quest to increase our understanding of the phenomenon. This chapter focuses on two methodologies—utilizing informant reports and experience sampling methodologies—that each offers unique advantages over relying on self-report trait questionnaires.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality. New York: Holt.
Blackie, L. E. R., & Jayawickreme, E. (2014). Promoting change in posttraumatic growth research: Response to commentaries. European Journal of Personality, 28, 351–361.
Blackie, L. E. R., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). The example of adverse life experiences as unique situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 385–386.
Blackie, L. E. R., Jayawickreme, E., Helzer, E. G., Forgeard, M. J., & Roepke, A. M. (2015). Investigating the veracity of self-perceived posttraumatic growth A profile analysis approach to corroboration. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 788–796. doi:10.1177/1948550615587986
Blackie, L. E. R., Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., Forgeard, M. J., Roepke, A. M., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Posttraumatic growth as positive personality change: Developing a measure to assess within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality,. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.001
Conner, T. S., Tennen, H., Fleeson, W., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Experience sampling methods: A modern idiographic approach to personality research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(3), 292–313.
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.
Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate. The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87.
Fleeson, W. (2007a). Situation‐based contingencies underlying trait‐content manifestation in behavior. Journal of personality, 75(4), 825–862.
Fleeson, W. (2007b). Studying personality processes: Explaining change in between-persons longitudinal and within-person multilevel models. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 523–542). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Fleeson, W. (2014). Four ways of (not) being real and whether they are essential for posttraumatic growth. European Journal of Personality, 28, 336–337.
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.
Frazier, P., Tennen, H., Gavian, M., Park, C., Tomich, P., & Tashiro, T. (2009). Does self-reported posttraumatic growth reflect genuine positive change? Psychological Science, 20(7), 912–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02381.x
Frazier, P., Coyne, J., & Tennen, H. (2014). Posttraumatic growth: A call for less, but better, research. European Journal of Personality, 28, 337–338.
Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x
Furr, R. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science. European Journal of Personality, 23(5), 369–401.
Helgeson, V. S. (2010). Corroboration of growth following breast cancer: Ten years later. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(5), 546–574.
Helgeson, V. S., Reynolds, K. A., & Tomich, P. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 797–816. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.797
Helzer, E. G., Furr, R. M., Hawkins, A., Barranti, M., Blackie, L. E., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Agreement on the perception of moral character. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1698–1710. doi:10.1177/0146167214554957
Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2014). Posttraumatic growth as positive personality change: evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28, 312–331.
Jayawickreme, E., Meindl, P., Helzer, E. G., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2014). Virtuous states and virtuous traits: how the empirical evidence regarding the existence of broad traits saves virtue ethics from the situationist challenge. Theory and Research in Education, 12(3), 1–26.
Kenny, D. A., & West, T. V. (2010). Similarity and agreement in self-and other perception: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 196–213.
Leising, D., Erbs, J., & Fritz, U. (2010). The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 668–682.
Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and trauma: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11–21. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e
Maercker, A., & Zoellner, T. (2004). The Janus face of self-perceived growth: Toward a two-component model of posttraumatic growth. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 41–48.
McMillen, J. C., & Cook, C. L. (2003). The positive by-products of spinal cord injury and their correlates. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48(2), 77–85.
Mogle, J., Almeida, D. M., & Stawski, R. S. (2015). Psychometric properties of micro- longitudinal assessments: Between- and within-person reliability, factor structure and discriminate validity of cognitive interference. In M. Diehl, K. Hooker, & M. Sliwinski (Eds.), Handbook of intraindividual variability, pp. 293–306.
Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. L. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 71–105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00815.x
Scollon, C. N., Prieto, C. K., & Diener, E. (2009). Experience sampling: promises and pitfalls, strength and weaknesses. In Assessing well-being (pp. 157–180). Netherlands: Springer.
Shakespeare-Finch, J. E., & Enders, T. (2008). Corroborating evidence of posttraumatic growth. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(4), 421–424.
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. doi:10.1007/BF02103658
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Target article: “Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.” Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (2009). Assessing positive life change: In search of meticulous methods. In C. L. Park, S. C. Lechner, M. H. Antoni, & A. L. Stanton (Eds.), Medical illness and positive life change: Can crisis lead to personal transformation? (pp. 31–49). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.
Vazire, S. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 472–481.
Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2010). Self-Knowledge of Personality: Do People Know Themselves? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 605–620.
Weiss, T. (2002). Posttraumatic growth in women with breast cancer and their husbands: An intersubjective validation study. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 20(2), 65–80.
Wilson, R., & Vazire, S. (2015). Taking personality to the next level: What does it mean to know a person? Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jayawickreme, E., Blackie, L.E.R. (2016). Methodologies for the Study of Posttraumatic Growth: Some New Directions. In: Exploring the Psychological Benefits of Hardship. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47989-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47989-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47987-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47989-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)