Skip to main content

Overcoming of Multilevel Theory, Within Relationships Among Europe, Member States and Subnational Levels of Government

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Consequences of the Crisis on European Integration and on the Member States

Part of the book series: Essays on Federalism and Regionalism ((SEFR,volume 2))

  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

This essay discusses the rise and decline of the multilevel paradigm: a doctrine that represented the European system as a real constitutional system, a unitary legal system, although legally pluralist and therefore deprived of the character of exclusivity. This essay points out that the crisis of sovereign debt has placed the Union in the grip of an unquestionable constitutional disorder. The principle of mutual recognition of constitutional authority by the systems belonging to the European Area, the core of the multilevel paradigm, is no longer the unquestioned prerequisite of the case-law of the crisis (as highlighted by the case-law of the FCC). Therefore, the multilevel theory is the wrong ‘prescription’ to overcome the constitutional disorder. On the contrary, what is required is a new doctrine that is capable of disclosing the real constituent powers of the current globalized world and their conflict for sovereignty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cantaro (2003).

  2. 2.

    Cantaro (2008).

  3. 3.

    Cantaro (2012).

  4. 4.

    Cantaro (2014), p. 49.

  5. 5.

    Pernice (1999), p. 703; Pernice (2002), p. 511; Pernice and Mayer Franz (2003), p. 43, on which see the critical considerations of Scarlatti (2012).

  6. 6.

    Pernice (2009a), p.385.

  7. 7.

    Cantaro (2010).

  8. 8.

    Mangiameli (2013).

  9. 9.

    Jorges and Giubboni (2013), p. 343.

  10. 10.

    Losurdo (2015), p. 108.

  11. 11.

    De Ioanna (2014), p. 123.

  12. 12.

    Cantaro (2011), p. 1; Cantaro and Losurdo (2013), p. 53.

  13. 13.

    Cantaro (2009), p. 121.

  14. 14.

    To summarize Donati (2014).

  15. 15.

    Mayer Franz (2014).

  16. 16.

    Streek (2014).

  17. 17.

    Pitruzzella (2013).

  18. 18.

    Gnesutta (2015), p. 97.

  19. 19.

    Paggi (2011).

  20. 20.

    For further clarifications Cantaro (2006), p. 507.

  21. 21.

    Canetti (1984).

References

  • Canetti, E. (1984). Crowds and powers (C. Stewart,Trans. (Macmillan)). New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A. (2003). Europa sovrana. La costituzione dell’Europa tra guerra e diritti. Bari: Dedalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A. (2006). Il rispetto delle funzioni essenziali dello Stato. In S. Mangiameli (Ed.), L’ordinamento europeo. I principi dell’Unione (Vol. 1, pp. 507 ff). Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A. (2008). Virtù e ‘vizi’ del paradigma multilivello. Report of the seminar La (des)constitucionalización en la Unión Europea. Universidad Complutense deMadrid. http://www.ucm.es

  • Cantaro, A. (2009). Democracia e identidad constitucional después de la ‘Lissabon Urteil’. La integración protegida. Revista de derecho constitucional europeo, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A. (Ed.). (2010). Il costituzionalismo asimmetrico dell’Unione. L’integrazione europea dopo il Trattato di Lisbona. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A. (2011). Giustizia e diritto nella scienza giuridica europea. In A. Cantaro (Ed.), Giustizia e diritto nella scienza giuridica contemporanea (pp. 1 ff). Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A. (2012). Crisi costituzionale europea e diritto della crisi. Dirittifondamentali.it. http://www.dirittifondamentali.it

  • Cantaro, A. (2014). Quo vadis Europa? Ascesa e declino dell’eccezionalismo. Rivista di politica, 4, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantaro, A., & Losurdo, F. (2013). Il ‘nuovo’ modello sociale europeo. Fine dell’eccezionalismo. Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 3/4, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ioanna, P. (2014). Regole fiscali e democrazia europea: un tornante cruciale nello sviluppo dell’Unione. Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 1, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, F. (2014). La crisi dell’euro tra Corti costituzionali e Corte di giustizia. Federalismi.it, 17/2014. http://www.federalismi.it

  • Gnesutta, C. (2015). Il contenuto ‘costituzionale’ della politica economica europea. In A. Cantaro (Ed.), Quo vadis Europa? Stabilità e crescita nell’ordinamento europeo (pp. 97 ff). Cultura Giuridica e diritto vivente, 2/2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11576/2627434

  • Jorges, C., & Giubboni, S. (2013). Diritto, politica ed economia nella crisi europea. Rivista critica del diritto privato, 3, 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losurdo, F. (2015). Stabilità e crescita da Maastricht al Fiscal compact.In A. Cantaro (Ed.), Quo vadis Europa? Stabilità e crescita nell’ordinamento europeo (pp. 108 ff). Cultura giuridica e diritto vivente, 2/2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11576/2627434

  • Mangiameli, S. (2013). Crisi economica e distribuzione territoriale del potere politico. Rivistaaic.it,4/2013. http://www.rivistaaic.it

  • Mayer Franz, C. (2014). Rebels without a cause?A critical analysis of the German Constitutional Court’s OMT reference. German law Journal, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paggi L. (2011). Mercato e interesse nazionale. In L. Paggi (Ed.), Un'altra Italia in un'altra Europa (ff. 5). Roma: CAROCCI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernice, I. (1999). Multilevel constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European constitution-making revisited. Common Market Law Review, 36, 703–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pernice, I. (2002). Multilevel constitutionalism in the European Union. European Law Rewiew, 27, 511–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernice, I. (2009). The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel constitutionalism in action. Columbia Journal of European Law, 15, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernice, I., & Mayer Franz, C. (2003). La Costituzione integrata dell’Europa. In G. Zagrebelsky (Ed.), Diritti e Costituzione nell’Unione Europea (pp. 43 ff). Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitruzzella, G. (2013). Crisi economica e decisioni di governo. Rivistaaic.it, 4/2013. http://www.rivistaaic.it

  • Scarlatti, P. (2012). Costituzionalismo multilivello e questione democratica nell’Europa del dopo-Lisbona. Rivistaaic.it, 1/2012. http://www.rivistaaic.it

  • Streek, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Cantaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cantaro, A. (2017). Overcoming of Multilevel Theory, Within Relationships Among Europe, Member States and Subnational Levels of Government. In: Mangiameli, S. (eds) The Consequences of the Crisis on European Integration and on the Member States. Essays on Federalism and Regionalism, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47964-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47964-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47963-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47964-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics