Skip to main content

Microbial Resource Centers Contribute to Bioprospecting of Bacteria and Filamentous Microfungi

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Bioprospecting

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 16))

Abstract

The immense diversity of microorganisms has remained largely untapped, especially with regard to bioprospecting. Through their isolation, microbes attain a substantial monetary value which microbial domain Biological Resource Centers (mBRCs) preserve in a highly cost-effective manner. Typically, mBRCs are publicly funded in order to provide quality-controlled, and well-characterized microbial resources and data, at low cost to researchers. The present chapter outlines the preconditions and scenarios for mBRCs to expand their traditional tasks and enter the field of bioprospecting. It appears most promising to generate information on the biosynthetic potential of novel types of microorganisms through extended characterization, metabolic profiling, and genome analyses. Particular challenges are an improved access to the vast uncharted microbial biodiversity, the compliance with new legal requirements, and the efficient linking to private industry as a novel stakeholder. A business plan is developed herein that proposes to join the expertise of different mBRCs to create a platform that provides a “one-stop-shop” with restricted access to a large number of well-characterized, pre-screened microbial resources in a legally compliant manner. As a typical and inherent weakness, the limited public funding of mBRCs often will not permit an expansion of tasks through the existing funding alone. Revenues generated from sales of even high value microbial resources to bioindustry rarely will cover costs. Therefore, alternative funding could be sought from the government agencies in charge of the bioeconomy that traditionally are not stakeholders of mBRC, and through the participation of mBRCs in dedicated funding programs for bioprospecting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABSCH, Acess and Benefit Sharing Clearing House (2015). https://absch.cbd.int/

  • Ando K, Jin TU, Funabiki R, Wu L, Thoetkiattikul H, Lee J-S, Techapattaraporn B, Changthavorn T (2014) Network of international exchange of microbes under the ACM (NIEMA) – a transfer and exchange system of microbes for microbial resource centres for non-commercial puposes according to the CBD and the nagoya protocol. Microbiol Cult Collect 30:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker BJ, Dick GJ (2013) Omics approaches in microbial ecology: charting the unknown. Microbe 8:353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz RH (2006) Marcel faber roundtable: is our antibiotic pipeline unproductive because of starvation, constipation or lack of inspiration? J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:507–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bérdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot 58:1–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bills G, Dombrowski A, Paláez F, Polishook J, An Z (2002) Recent and future discoveries of pharmacologically active metabolites from tropical fungi. In: Watling R, Frankland JC, Ainsworth AM, Isaac S, Robinson CH (eds) Tropical mycology, Vol. 2, Micromycetes. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 165–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell M (2011) The fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species? Am J Bot 98:426–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MS (2005) Natural products to drugs: natural product derived compounds in clinical trials. Nat Prod Rep 22:162–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity (2015). Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization (ABS) to the convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf

  • Chin Y-W, Balaunas MJ, Chai HB, Kinghorn AD (2006) Drug discovery from natural sources. AAPS J 8:E239–E253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper MA, Shlaes D (2011) Fix the antibiotics pipeline. Nature 472:32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis TP, Sloan WT, Scannell JW (2002) Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:10494–10499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dawyndt P, Vancanneyt M, De Meyer H, Swings J (2005) Knowledge accumulation and resolution of data inconsistencies during the integration of microbial information sources. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17:1111–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykhuizen DE (1998) Santa Rosalia revisited: why are there so many species of bacteria? Ant Van Leeuwenhoek 73:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young (2014) Beyond borders – biotechnology industry report, http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Industries/Life-Sciences/EY-beyond-borders-unlocking-value

  • ECCO, European Culture Collection’s Organisation (2015). www.eccosite.org

  • EU (2014). Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32014R0511

  • EuropaBio™ (2014) Annual Report 2013-2014, http://www.europabio.org/europabio-annual-report-2013-2014

  • Foesel BU, Rohde M, Overmann J (2013) Blastocatella fastidiosa gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from semiarid savanna soil – the first described species of Acidobacteria subdivision 4. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:82–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritze D, Smith D, Martin D (2010). Third intermediate report on the GBRCN demonstration project. Germany: GBRCN Secretariat. ISBN 978-3-00-031458-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman JL, Stern S (2011) Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: the impact of institutions on cumulative research. American. Econ Rev 101:1933–1963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GCM, Global Catalogue of Microorganisms (2015) http://gcm.wfcc.info

  • Genilloud O (2014) The re-emerging role of microbial natural products in antibiotic discovery. Ant van Leeuwenhoek 106:173–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser KB, Mayer AM (2009) A renaissance in marine pharmacology: from preclinical curiosity to clinical reality. Biochem Pharmacol 78:440-448

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindra TH, Yang D, Rudolf JD, Xie P, Xie G, Teng Q, Lohman JR, Zhu X, Huang Y, Zhao L-X, Jiang Y, Duan Y, Shen B (2014) Strain prioritization for natural product discovery by a high-throughput real-time PCR method. J Nat Prod 77:2296–2303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • IMS Health Market Prognosis (2012) http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/ims/Global/Content/Corporate/Press%20Room/Top-Line%20Market%20Data%20&%20Trends/2011%20Top-line%20Market%20Data/Regional_Pharma_Market_by_ Spending_2011-2016.pdf

  • Jaspers E, Overmann J (2004) The ecological significance of “microdiversity”: identical 16S rRNA gene sequences represent bacteria with highly divergent genomes and physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4831–4839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jeske O, Jogler M, Petersen J, Sikorski J, Jogler C (2013) From genome mining to phenotypic microarrays: planctomycetes as source for novel bioactive molecules. Ant Van Leeuwenhoek 104:551–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kate KT, Laird SA (1999) The commercial use of biodiversity: access to genetic resources and benefit sharing . Earthscan Publications Ltd., Londonpp 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • SP Lapage, PHA Sneath, EF Lessel, VBD Skerman, HPR Seeliger, WA Clark (1992) International code of nomenclature of bacteria. Bacteriological code, 1990 revision. ASM Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomes CJ, Bateman RP, Johnson DL, Langewald J, Thomas M (2001) Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Annu Rev Entomol 46:667–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LPSN, List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (2015) http://www.bacterio.net/-number.html#total

  • Mayer AM, Glaser KB, Cuevas C, Jacobs RS, Kem W, Little RD, McIntosh JM, Newman DJ, Potts BC, Shuster DE (2010) The odyssey of marine pharmaceuticals: a current pipeline perspective. Trends Pharmacol Sci 31:255–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maymó-Gatell X, Chien Y-T, Gossett JM, Zinder SH (1997) Isolation of a bacterium that reductively dechlorinates tetrachloroethene to ethene. Science 276:1568–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MIRRI, Microbial Resource Reseach Infrastructure (2015) http://www.mirri.org/home.html

  • Miyazaki M (2006) Economic value of microbial resources. Microbiol Cult Collect 22:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Nett M, Erol Ö, Kehraus S, Köck M, Krick A, Eguereva E, Neu E, König GM (2006) Siphonazole, an unusual metabolite from Herpetosiphon sp. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:3863–3867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman DJ, Cragg GM (2012) Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod 75:311–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) Guidance for the operation of Biological Resource Centres (BRCs) [‘Biological Research Centres’ is erroneously printed on the cover of this document], OECD. http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/23547743.pdf

  • Overmann J (2012) Principles of enrichment, isolation, cultivation, and preservation of bacteria. In: Rosenberg E, Stackebrandt E, DeLong EF, Thompson F, Lory S (eds) The prokaryotes, vol 4. Springer, New York. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30194-0_7

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmann J (2015) Significance and future role of microbial resource centers. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:258–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PhRMA (2012) Pharmaceutical research and manufacturers of America, drug discovery and development: understanding the R&D process, www.innovation.org

  • Rocha J, Peixe L, Gomes NCM, Calado R (2011) Cnidarians as a source of new marine bioactive compounds – an overview of the last decade and future steps for bioprospecting. Mar Drugs 9:1860–1886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quaiser A, Ochsenreiter T, Lanz C, Schuster SC, Treusch AH, Eck J, Schleper C (2003) Acidobacteria form a coherent but highly diverse group within the bacterial domain: evidence from environmental genomics. Mol Microbiol 50:563–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(Database issue): D590-596

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosselló-Móra R, Amann RI (2015) Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar O, González I, Genilloud O (2002) New genus-specific primers for the PCR identification of novel isolates of the genera Nocardiopsis and Saccharothrix. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1411–1421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford RA, Cole JR, Tiedje JM (2002) Characterization and description of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans gen. nov., sp. nov., an aryl-halorespiring facultative anaerobic myxobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:893–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scannell JW, Blnackley A, Boldon H, Warrington B (2012) Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11:191–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schüngel M, Stackebrandt E, Bizet C, Smith D (2013) MIRRI – The microbial resource research infrastructure: managing resources for the bio-economy. EMBnet J 19(1):5–8. (http://journal.embnet.org/index.php/embnetjournal/article/view/706)

  • Simpson DR (1997) Biodiversity prospecting: shopping the wilds is not the key to conservation. Resour Futur 126:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SB, Zhang C, Zink DL, Herath K, Ondeyka J, Masurekar P, Jayasuriya H, Goetz MA, Tormo JR, Vicente F, Martín J, González I, Genilloud O (2013) Occurrence, distribution, dereplication and efficient discovery of thiazolyl peptides by sensitive-resistant pair screening. J Antibiot 66:599–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D (2012) Culture collections. Adv Appl Microbiol 79:73–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D (2014) Culture collections. In: Batt CA, Tortorello ML (eds) Encyclopedia of food microbiology, vol 1. Elsevier Ltd/Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 546–552

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Fritze F, Stackebrandt E (2013) Public service collections and biological resource centres of microorganisms. In: Rosenberg E, De Long EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (eds) The prokaryotes – prokaryotic biology and symbiotic associations. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 267–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Mc Cluskey K, Stackebrandt E (2014) Culture collection funding models and BRC business plans, SpringerPlus 3, 81. http://www.springerplus.com/content/3/1/81

  • Söhngen C, Bunk B, Podstawka A, Gleim D, Overmann J (2014) BacDive – the bacterial diversity metadatabase. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D592–D599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stackebrandt E (2010) Diversification and focusing: strategies of microbial culture collections. Trends Microbiol 18:283–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stackebrandt E, Smith D, Casaregola S, Varese GC, Verkleij G, Lima N, Bridge P (2014) Deposit of microbial strains in public service collections as part of the publication process to underpin good practice in science. Springer Plus 3:208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara H, J Ma, Miyazaki S, Shimura J, Takishima Y (eds) (1993) World directory of collections of cultures of microorganisms. ISBN 4-930813-56-5, 1152 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuama EÓ, Deck J, Dröge G, Döring M, Field D, Kottmann R, Ma J, Mori H, Morrison N, Sterk P et al (2012) Meeting report: Hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and MIxS standards alignment (February 2012). Stand Genomic Sci 7:166–170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WDCM, World Data Center for Microorganisms (2015). Culture collections information worldwide. http://www.wfcc.info/ccinfo/statistics/

  • Weissmann KJ, Müller R (2010) Myxobacterial secondary metabolites: bioactivities andmodes-of-action. Nat Prod Rep 27:1276–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WFCC, World Federation of Culture Collections (2015) http://gcm.wfcc.info/overview/

  • Wilson MC, Mori T, Rückert C, Uria AR, Helf MJ, Takada K et al (2014) An environmental bacterial taxon with a large and distinct metabolic repertoire. Nature 506:58–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIPO, World Intellectual Property Organization (2015) ( http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/micros/index.html )

  • Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN et al (2009) A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of bacteria and archaea. Nature 462:1056–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Sun Q, Sugawara H, Yang S, Zhou Y, McCluskey K, Vasilenko A, Suzuki K-I, Ohkuma M, Lee Y, Robert V, Ingsriswang S, Guissart F, Philippe D, Ma J (2013) Global catalogue of microorganisms (gcm): a comprehensive database and information retrieval, analysis, and visualization system for microbial resources. BMC Genomics 14:933

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xie P, Ma M, Rateb ME, Shaaban KA, Yu Z, Huang SX, Zhao LX, Zhu X, Yan Y, Peterson RM, Lohman JR, Yang D, Yin M, Rudolf JD, Jiang Y, Duan Y, Shen B (2014) Biosynthetic potential-based strain prioritization for natural product discovery: a showcase for diterpenoid-producing actinomycetes. J Nat Prod 77:377–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz P, Kottmann R, Field D, Knight R, Cole JR, Amaral-Zettler L, Gilbert JA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Johnston A, Cochrane G et al (2011) Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat Biotechnol 29:415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants of the German Federal Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF) through the German Centre of Infection Research (DZIF) (grant 8000-105-3). Additional support was by the European Commission through funding of the preparatory phase of the Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure (MIRRI, No. 312251) and through the FP7-project ‘Marine Microorganisms: Cultivation Methods for Improving their Biotechnological Applications’ (MaCuMBA, No. 311975) and is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Amber Hartman Scholz for useful comments and suggestions regarding the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Overmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Overmann, J., Smith, D. (2017). Microbial Resource Centers Contribute to Bioprospecting of Bacteria and Filamentous Microfungi. In: Paterson, R., Lima, N. (eds) Bioprospecting. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47935-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics