Abstract
In the field of sustainable urban development ModularCity as a socio-technological innovation, which combines methods and approaches from computer-assisted planning, geography and social work. It allows planning representatives to analyse the socio-spatial context of future development projects by editing, collecting and visualizing geo-referenced, objective as well as subjective, data in one planning tool. This article explores ModularCity’s impact for participative and socially sensitive urban planning and reflects the options and limits of data-driven analysis and socio-spatial visualization. The focus is on the translation between stakeholder’s different planning concepts, goals and languages and it will be discussed how ModularCity’s strategies of integration, visualisation and responsiveness serve to the translational demand in sustainable urban planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For more information see www.modularcity.ch.
- 2.
ROI stands for Return of Investment.
References
Allmendinger, P. (2009). Planning theory (2nd edn). Planning-environment-cities). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Democratising engagement: What the UK can learn from international experience. London: Demos.
Drilling, M. (2013). Planning sustainable cities: Why environmental policy needs social policy. In I. Wallimann (Ed.), Environmental policy is social policy—Social policy is environmental policy: Toward sustainability policy (pp. 103–119). New York: Springer.
Drilling, M., & Oehler, P. (2013). Soziale Arbeit und Stadtentwicklung aus einer planungsbezogenen Perspektive. In M. Drilling & P. Oehler (Eds.), Soziale Arbeit und Stadtentwicklung: Forschungsperspektiven, Handlungsfelder, Herausforderungen (pp. 87–109). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Evans, P. (2012). Political strategies for more liveable cities: Lessons from six cases of development and political transition. In S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 499–517). New York: Wiley.
Fabian, C., Klöti, T., & Stark, H.-J. (2013). Online-Befragung zur Nutzung und Bewertung des Markthallenareals in Langenthal. Langenthal: Bericht zu den Befragungsergebnissen zu Handen des Gemeinderates.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Healey, P. (1992). Planning through Debate. The communicative turn in planning theory. The Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162.
Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472.
Klöti, T., Drilling, M., & rhim kommunikation. (2014). “Warum eigentlich Partizipation?” Sozialwissenschaftliche Analyse aktueller Partizipationsverständnisse in der Planung, Gestaltung und Nutzung öffentlicher Räume.
Kolko Phillips, N., & Straussner, S. L. (2002). Urban social work: An introduction to policy and practice in the cities. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Mouffe, C. (2007). Über das Politische: Wider die kosmopolitische Illusion (Edition Suhrkamp, Vol. 2483). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Neuhaus, F., Stark, H.-J., & Drilling, M. (2015). Atlas ePartizipation: Demokratische Stadtentwicklung. Brugg: FHNW.
Oehler, P., & Drilling, M. (2013). Soziale Arbeit, Gemeinwesenarbeit und Stadtentwicklung. Eine theoriegeschichtliche Spurensuche. In M. Drilling, & P. Oehler (Eds.), Soziale Arbeit und Stadtentwicklung: Forschungsperspektiven, Handlungsfelder, Herausforderungen (pp. 13–41). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Riege, M. (2012). Sozialraumanalyse: Grundlagen-Methoden-Praxis (3., neu bearb. und erg. Aufl. ed., [SRM-Reihe], Vol. Bd 8). Köln: Verlag Sozial Raum Management.
Selle, K. (2013). Über Bürgerbeteiligung hinaus: Stadtentwicklung als Gemeinschaftsaufgabe? Analysen und Konzepte (Edition Stadt-Entwicklung). Detmold: Rohn.
Stadtbauamt Langenthal. (2010). Grundlagen für die Erarbeitung eines Entwicklungs- und Nutzungskonzeptes für das Markthallenareal. Langenthal: Stadt Langenthal.
Stark, H.-J., Klöti, T., Hollenstein, D., Bleisch, S., & Fabian, C. (2013). Including a social perspective into urban planning using visualisations based on self-organising maps. Genf: Paper presented at the Geospatial World Forum.
Werner, S. (2012). Steuerung von Kooperationen in der integrierten und sozialen Stadtentwicklung: Machtverhältnisse und Beteiligung im Prozessraum. Diss Univ Passau, 2012, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klöti, T., Drilling, M., Fabian, C. (2017). A Social Work Perspective on Socio-technological Innovations in Urban Planning and Development. In: Certomà, C., Dyer, M., Pocatilu, L., Rizzi, F. (eds) Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47903-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47904-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)