Skip to main content

Renewable Distributed Generation and Its Stakeholders’ Engagement Contributing to Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Brazil Unisul—Universidade Do Sul de Santa Catarina, Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 936 Accesses

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

The Brazilian electricity grid will likely continue to depend on hydroelectricity in the medium term. However, mainly because of severe droughts in 2013 and 2014 (as a matter of fact, the droughts started in December, 2012, and are still worrying Brazilians in the first quarter of 2015), renewable and non-renewable alternative sources are expected to grow. Some of the factors expected to spur small-scale, distributed generation (DG) are costs and socio-environmental impacts of expanding the national grid, the country’s large, geographically diverse territory, and decreasing costs of renewable DG sources. Complementing the Brazilian electricity mix with renewable DG can contribute not only to climate change mitigation—by avoiding new GHG emissions—but also to climate change adaptation through economic and electric diversification. Indeed, economic diversification is one of the goals on the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (see U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change). The authors noted in a previous article the lack of information in Brazil about photovoltaic energy and the role of the university promoting this concept (see Suni, Benevides, and Guerra). Now, they intend to demonstrate, besides DG’s benefits to climate change mitigation and adaptation, how stakeholders’ engagement in this field can improve the sustainability of DG and accelerate its adoption in the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hydro, thermo and nuclear power plants accounted for 66.31, 28.03 and 1.47 % resp. Source: http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/capacidadebrasil/capacidadebrasil.cfm.

  2. 2.

    According to BACEN—the Brazilian Central Bank—on Oct 31st, 2014, when the auction took place, the exchange rates were: EUR 1.00 ≡ BRL 3.06; USD 1.00 ≡ BRL 2.44; and GBP 1.00 ≡ BRL 3.91. On March, 14th, 2015, mainly due to a political crisis, the figures had changed to: EUR 1.00 ≡ BRL 3.40; USD 1.00 ≡ BRL 3.23; and GBP 1.00 ≡ BRL 4.76, corresponding to a depreciation of Brazilian currency of 11, 32 and 22 in 4.5 months, respectively.

  3. 3.

    As referenced above, while this article is being written, the exchange rates in Brazil are unfavorable to imports, but this situation may be temporary, as it is due to the uncertainty of the aforementioned political crisis.

  4. 4.

    Even in recent years, wind farm technology was uncompetitive in Brazil, while now there are competitive local industries, both national and multinational.

  5. 5.

    See ANEEL Resolution 482/2012.

  6. 6.

    See Comparação da emissão de gases de efeito estufa (GEE) na geração nuclear de eletricidade no Brasil com as de outras fontes, Economia and Energia (E&E), year XV, number 79, from October-November 2010. Available on http://ecen.com/eee79/eee79p/gases_nuclear.htm.

  7. 7.

    In terms of sun irradiance and wind potential, Brazilian territory mostly presents satisfactory to very satisfactory conditions to both solutions individually, as well as in combination.

  8. 8.

    See Johansson.

  9. 9.

    See Frich et al.; Rosenzweig et al.

  10. 10.

    See Traca de Almeida et al.

  11. 11.

    See Pepermans et al., Farrell, Lovins et al.

  12. 12.

    See Pepermans et al.

  13. 13.

    See BP Statistical Review of World Energy.

  14. 14.

    See BP Statistical Review of World Energy.

  15. 15.

    See Ernst and Young.

  16. 16.

    See Navigant Research.

  17. 17.

    See Institute for Energy Research.

  18. 18.

    See Romero.

  19. 19.

    See Muro et al.

  20. 20.

    See BP Statistical Review of World Energy.

  21. 21.

    Available on www.sas-pm.com/SAS/sa tech.htm.

  22. 22.

    See Niez.

  23. 23.

    See Blenkinsopp et al.

  24. 24.

    See Gomez and Silveira.

  25. 25.

    See Niez; Instituto Acende Brasil.

References

  • ANEEL (Agência Nacional De Energia Elétrica). Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency. Capacidade De Geração Do Brasil. N.p., Web. http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/capacidadebrasil/capacidadebrasil.cfm.

  • ANEEL (Agência Nacional De Energia Elétrica). (2012). Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency. Resolution N 482/2012. http://www.aneel.gov.br/cedoc/ren2012482.pdf

  • Blenkinsopp, J., Coles, S. R., & Kirwan, K. (2013). Renewable Energy for Rural Communities in Maharashtra, India. Energy Policy (2013): n. pag. Elsevier, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • BP. (2013). Statistical Review of World Energy 2014. N.p., June 2013, Web. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview

  • Ernst & Young. (2013). Distributed generation hits the big numbers. Utilities Unbundled, n. pag. December 2013, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. (2011). Democratizing the electricity system: A vision for the 21st century grid. The New Rules Project. www.newrules.org

  • Frich, P. (2002). Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Climate Research 19, (n.d.): n. pag. 2002, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, M. F., & Silveira, S. (2010) Rural electrification of the brazilian amazon—achievements and lessons. Energy Policy, 38(10):6251–260, Elsevier, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, B. (2013) Security Aspects of future renewable energy systems—A short overview. Energy, n. pag. Elsevier, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Energy Research. The Status of Renewable Electricity Mandates in the States. Rep. N.p., n.d. Web. http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/IER-RPS-Study-Final.pdf

  • Lovins, A. B., & Datta, E. K. (2002). Small is profitable: The hidden economic benefits of making electrical resources the right size. Snowmass, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navigant Research. (2014). Global Distributed Generation Deployment Forecast. N.p., Fall 2014. Web. http://www.navigantresearch.com/research/global-distributed-generation-deployment-forecast

  • Pepermans, G., Driesen, J., Haeseldonckx, D., Belmans, R., & D’haeseleer, W. (2005). Distributed generation: Definition, benefits and issues. Energy Policy, 33(6):787–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, J. (2013). Green Jobs: Not a Black and White Issue. U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, C. (2001). Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events. Global Change and Human Health, 2(2):90–104 (Springer, Web).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jon, S., & Toman, M. (2010). Green Stimulus, Economic Recovery, and Long-Term Sustainable Development. The World Bank, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suni, A., Benevides, M., & de Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. (2014). The Role of the University in Promoting Photovoltaic Usage in Brazil. Springer, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traca De Almeida, A. (2007) Source reliability in a combined wind-solar-hydro system. Power Apparatus and Systems, February 2007, Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, N.p., n.d. Web. http://unfccc.int/adaptation/items/7006.php

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as a part of two programs from the University of Southern Santa Catarina (Unisul): Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Research Group (Greens) and REGSA - Promoting Renewable Electricity Generation in South America -, in the context of the projects: Linkages between energy, food and water consumption in the context of climate change mitigation strategies (LINKS 2015), and Building Resilience in a Dynamic Global Economy: Complexity across scales in the Brazilian Food-Water-Energy Nexus (BRIDGE), funded by the Newton Fund, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina and the Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Corrêa de Sá e Benevides .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Sá e Benevides, M.C., Suni, A., de Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O. (2017). Renewable Distributed Generation and Its Stakeholders’ Engagement Contributing to Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Brazil Unisul—Universidade Do Sul de Santa Catarina, Brazil. In: Leal Filho, W., Mifsud, M., Shiel, C., Pretorius, R. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47895-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics