Skip to main content

The Social Dynamics of Language Change in Online Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10046))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Language change is a complex social phenomenon, revealing pathways of communication and sociocultural influence. But, while language change has long been a topic of study in sociolinguistics, traditional linguistic research methods rely on circumstantial evidence, estimating the direction of change from differences between older and younger speakers. In this paper, we use a data set of several million Twitter users to track language changes in progress. First, we show that language change can be viewed as a form of social influence: we observe complex contagion for phonetic spellings and “netspeak” abbreviations (e.g., lol), but not for older dialect markers from spoken language. Next, we test whether specific types of social network connections are more influential than others, using a parametric Hawkes process model. We find that tie strength plays an important role: densely embedded social ties are significantly better conduits of linguistic influence. Geographic locality appears to play a more limited role: we find relatively little evidence to support the hypothesis that individuals are more influenced by geographically local social ties, even in their usage of geographical dialect markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The basic unit of linguistic differentiation is referred to as a “variable” in the sociolinguistic and dialectological literature [50]. We maintain this terminology here.

  2. 2.

    After running SAGE to identify words with coefficients above 2.0, we manually removed hashtags, named entities, non-English words, and descriptions of events.

  3. 3.

    Other sources, such as http://urbandictionary.com, report asl to be an abbreviation of age, sex, location? However, this definition is not compatible with typical usage on Twitter, e.g., currently hungry asl or that movie was funny asl.

  4. 4.

    ard, inna, and lls appear on multiple cities’ lists. These words are characteristic of the neighboring cities of Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C.

  5. 5.

    The shuffle test assumes that the likelihood of two users forming a social network connection does not change over time. Researchers have proposed a test [32] that removes this assumption; we will scale this test to our data set in future work.

  6. 6.

    We also compared the full feature set—i.e., F1+F2+F3+F4—to feature set F1+F2+F3 and feature set F1+F2+F4. The results were almost identical, indicating that F3 (tie strength) and F4 (local) provide complementary information.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Adar, E.: Friends and neighbors on the web. Soc. Netw. 25(3), 211–230 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Zamal, F., Liu, W., Ruths, D.: Homophily and latent attribute inference: inferring latent attributes of Twitter users from neighbors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), pp. 387–390 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alim, H.S.: Hip hop nation language. In: Duranti, A. (ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, pp. 272–289. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R., Mahdian, M.: Influence and correlation in social networks. In: Proceedings of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 7–15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Androutsopoulos, J.: Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In: Coupland, N., Kristiansen, T. (eds.) Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Novus, Oslo (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anis, J.: Neography: unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. In: Danet, B., Herring, S.C. (eds.) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, pp. 87–115. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Backstrom, L., Sun, E., Marlow, C.: Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity. In: Proceedings of the Conference on World-Wide Web (WWW), pp. 61–70 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., Adamic, L.: The role of social networks in information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the Conference on World-Wide Web (WWW), Lyon, France, pp. 519–528 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldwin, T., Cook, P., Lui, M., MacKinlay, A., Wang, L.: How noisy social media text, how diffrnt social media sources. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP 2013), pp. 356–364 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 57(1), 289–300 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bucholtz, M., Hall, K.: Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Stud. 7(4–5), 585–614 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bucholtz, M., Bermudez, N., Fung, V., Edwards, L., Vargas, R.: Hella Nor Cal or totally So Cal? The perceptual dialectology of California. J. Engl. Linguist. 35(4), 325–352 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Centola, D., Macy, M.: Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol. 113(3), 702–734 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crystal, D.: Language and the Internet, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunbar, R.I.: Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 22(6), 469–493 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Eckert, P.: Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Blackwell, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenstein, J.: What to do about bad language on the internet. In: Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pp. 359–369 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eisenstein, J.: Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. J. Sociolinguistics 19, 161–188 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenstein, J.: Written dialect variation in online social media. In: Boberg, C., Nerbonne, J., Watt, D. (eds.) Handbook of Dialectology. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenstein, J., Ahmed, A., Xing, E.P.: Sparse additive generative models of text. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 1041–1048 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fagyal, Z., Swarup, S., Escobar, A.M., Gasser, L., Lakkaraju, K.: Centers and peripheries: network roles in language change. Lingua 120(8), 2061–2079 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Green, L.J.: African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Griffiths, T.L., Kalish, M.L.: Language evolution by iterated learning with Bayesian agents. Cogn. Sci. 31(3), 441–480 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamilton, W.L., Leskovec, J., Jurafsky, D.: Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hawkes, A.G.: Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58(1), 83–90 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Herring, S.C.: Grammar and electronic communication. In: Chapelle, C.A. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huberman, B., Romero, D.M., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday 14(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnstone, B., Bhasin, N., Wittkofski, D.: “Dahntahn” Pittsburgh: monophthongal /aw/ and representations of localness in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Am. Speech 77(2), 148–176 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kulkarni, V., Al-Rfou, R., Perozzi, B., Skiena, S.: Statistically significant detection of linguistic change. In: Proceedings of the Conference on World-Wide Web (WWW), pp. 625–635 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the Conference on World-Wide Web (WWW), pp. 591–600 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. La Fond, T., Neville, J.: Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects. In: Proceedings of the Conference on World-Wide Web (WWW), pp. 601–610 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Labov, W.: The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19(3), 273–309 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Labov, W.: Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 2: Social Factors, vol. 2. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Labov, W.: Review of linguistic variation as social practice, by Penelope Eckert. Lang. Soc. 31, 277–284 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Labov, W.: Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors, vol. 3. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li, L., Deng, H., Dong, A., Chang, Y., Zha, H.: Identifying and labeling search tasks via query-based Hawkes processes. In: Proceedings of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 731–740 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, L., Zha, H.: Learning parametric models for social infectivity in multi-dimensional Hawkes processes. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Milroy, L., Milroy, J.: Social network and social class: toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Lang. Soc. 21(01), 1–26 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Niyogi, P., Berwick, R.C.: A dynamical systems model for language change. Complex Syst. 11(3), 161–204 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Ogata, Y.: On Lewis’ simulation method for point processes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 27(1), 23–31 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Pavalanathan, U., Eisenstein, J.: Audience-modulated variation in online social media. Am. Speech 90(2), 187–213 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pavalanathan, U., Eisenstein, J.: Confounds and consequences in geotagged Twitter data. In: Proceedings of Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rickford, J.R.: Geographical diversity, residential segregation, and the vitality of African American vernacular English and its speakers. Transform. Anthropol. 18(1), 28–34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sadilek, A., Kautz, H., Bigham, J.P.: Finding your friends and following them to where you are. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), pp. 723–732 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Squires, L.: Enregistering internet language. Lang. Soc. 39, 457–492 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tagliamonte, S.A., Denis, D.: Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. Am. Speech 83(1), 3–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Trudgill, P.: Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Lang. Soc. 1(2), 179–195 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wolfram, W.: The linguistic variable: fact and fantasy. Am. Speech 66(1), 22–32 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhao, Q., Erdogdu, M.A., He, H.Y., Rajaraman, A., Leskovec, J.: Seismic: a self-exciting point process model for predicting tweet popularity. In: Proceedings of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 1513–1522 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the reviewers for their feedback, to Márton Karsai for suggesting the infection risk analysis, and to Le Song for discussing Hawkes processes. John Paparrizos is an Alexander S. Onassis Foundation Scholar. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under awards IIS-1111142 and RI-1452443, by the National Institutes of Health under award number R01-GM112697-01, and by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Eisenstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goel, R. et al. (2016). The Social Dynamics of Language Change in Online Networks. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, YY. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10046. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47879-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47880-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics