Skip to main content

Identifying Partisan Slant in News Articles and Twitter During Political Crises

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10046))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we are interested in understanding the interrelationships between mainstream and social media in forming public opinion during mass crises, specifically in regards to how events are framed in the mainstream news and on social networks and to how the language used in those frames may allow to infer political slant and partisanship. We study the lingual choices for political agenda setting in mainstream and social media by analyzing a dataset of more than 40M tweets and more than 4M news articles from the mass protests in Ukraine during 2013–2014—known as “Euromaidan”—and the post-Euromaidan conflict between Russian, pro-Russian and Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. We design a natural language processing algorithm to analyze at scale the linguistic markers which point to a particular political leaning in online media and show that political slant in news articles and Twitter posts can be inferred with a high level of accuracy. These findings allow us to better understand the dynamics of partisan opinion formation during mass crises and the interplay between mainstream and social media in such circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We used the Skip-Gram model as it provided more interpretable results.

  2. 2.

    Gensim natural language processing library https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/.

  3. 3.

    as ranked by the Medialogia rating agency http://goo.gl/JNvx0Y.

  4. 4.

    This is achieved through filtering the corpora by the relevant keywords, i.e., “kyiv”, “ukraine”, “donbass”, “maidan”, “crimea”, “luhansk”, “dnr” and “lnr”. Adding a wider set of keywords had little effect on improving the recall of filtering.

  5. 5.

    We refer to each of these three classes as ‘party’ or ‘parties’ in the rest of this paper.

  6. 6.

    Note that this is equivalent to using the mean \(\frac{\sum _{s \in S}{\rho _w^s}}{|S|}\), since the sum for all words is computed over the same set of sources S.

  7. 7.

    We note that a straightforward approach of removing the most prominent news source markers – as measured by the relative frequency introduced in the previous section – has proved to be inefficient for the considered classification problem. In contrast, the method we introduce in the rest of this section provides a more nuanced approach in estimating the relevance of each classification feature.

  8. 8.

    The proposed approach was implemented by adapting the internal implementation of the Random Forest algorithm from the open source scikit-learn libary.

References

  1. An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P., Crowcroft, J., Quercia, D.: Visualizing media bias through Twitter. In: Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, P.K., Crowcroft, J.: Media landscape in Twitter: a world of new conventions and political diversity. In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. An, J., Quercia, D., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., Crowcroft, J.: Sharing political news: the balancing act of intimacy and socialization in selective exposure. EPJ Data Sci. 3(1), 1–21 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. An, J., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Fragmented social media: a look into selective exposure to political news. In: Proceedings of World Wide Web Companion (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. An, J., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Partisan sharing: Facebook evidence and societal consequences. In: Proceedings of ACM COSN (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aragón, P., Volkovich, Y., Laniado, D., Kaltenbrunner, A.: When a movement becomes a party: computational assessment of new forms of political organization in social media. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boutet, A., Kim, H., Yoneki, E.: What’s in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now! Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(4), 1379–1391 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brodersen, A., Scellato, S., Wattenhofer, M.: Youtube around the world: geographic popularity of videos. In: Proceedings of WWW (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P.: Dissemination biases of social media channels: on the topical coverage of socially shared news. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, R., Ruths, D.: Classifying political orientation on Twitter: it’s not easy! In: ICWSM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conover, M.D., Gonçalves, B., Ratkiewicz, J., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Predicting the political alignment of Twitter users. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 192–199. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diuk, N.: Euromaidan: Ukraine’s self-organizing revolution. World Affairs 176(6), 9–16 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein, J.: The role of digital networked technologies in the Ukrainian orange revolution. Berkman Center Research Publication (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Moreno, Y.: Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. Am. Behav. Sci. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. González-Bailón, S., et al.: The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hegelich, S., Janetzko, D.: Are social bots on twitter political actors? Empirical evidence from a Ukrainian social botnet. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Howard, P.N.: The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikolov, T., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mikolov, T., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of Workshop at ICLR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oates, S., Lokot, T.: Twilight of the gods?: How the Internet challenged Russian television news frames in the winter protests of 2011–2012. In: International Association for Media and Communication Research Annual Conference (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Onuch, O.: Euromaidan protests in Ukraine: social media versus social networks. Probl. Post-Communism 62, 1–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Papacharissi, Z., Chadwick, A.: The virtual sphere 2.0: the internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In: Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, pp. 230–245 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 430–438. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: A machine learning approach to Twitter user classification. In: ICWSM 2011, vol. 1, pp. 281–288 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szostek, J.: The media battles of Ukraine’s Euromaidan. Digital Icons 11, 1–19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vijayaraghavan, P., Vosoughi, S., Roy, D.: Automatic detection and categorization of election-related tweets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05150 (2016)

  27. Zelinska, O.: Who were the protestors and what did they want? Demokratizatsiya 23(4), 379–400 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zeng, L., Starbird, K., Spiro, E.S.: # unconfirmed: classifying rumor stance in crisis-related social media messages. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhukov, Y.M., Baum, M.A.: Reporting bias and information warfare. In: International Studies Association Annual Convention (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Space for Sharing (S4S) project (Grant No. ES/M00354X/1). We would also like to thank the developers of the Kobzi application for providing the News-UA dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dmytro Karamshuk or Nishanth Sastry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karamshuk, D., Lokot, T., Pryymak, O., Sastry, N. (2016). Identifying Partisan Slant in News Articles and Twitter During Political Crises. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, YY. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10046. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47879-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47880-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics