Abstract
The Innovation and Technology for Development Centre at the Technical University of Madrid (itdUPM) in Spain is a collaborative network of lecturers, research students and non-academic professionals with a common interest in promoting action research for sustainable development. This paper is based on an in-depth analysis of itdUPM’s co-evolutionary design process. The study is presented as an example of an inter-disciplinary environment that has been established for the co-creation of innovative technical and organisational solutions to address sustainable development challenges. The aim of this paper is to offer a case study of a collaborative technology and sustainability centre at the Technical University of Madrid (UPM), in Spain. Two focus areas are emphasised: the action research process chosen for the establishment and development of a networked centre, the Innovation and Technology for Development Centre (itdUPM), within the dominant disciplinary culture of a University organised along traditional lines and; the Centre’s organisational design features which have proven to be appropriate for the inter-disciplinary and multi-actor action research processes necessary for addressing the challenges of creating a more sustainable society. The methodology used draws on theory to explore the Centre’s development which is conceived as an evolutionary, participative, and action research process. The paper presents the context, background, design, and launch features of the itdUPM. The main lessons learnt refer to five organisational design issues that were critical for the success of the Centre and its activities. The paper describes the issues and challenges faced by the Centre as a “niche” operating in a dissimilar “regime”. Although the findings are specific to the UPM context, we believe that they can inspire and stimulate other Universities interested in the development of sustainability initiatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvesson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness: Consumption, higher education, and work organization. Oxford: OUP.
Bursztyn, M., & Drummond, J. (2014). Sustainability science and the university: pitfalls and bridges to interdisciplinarity. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 313–332.
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. In Environmental innovation and societal transitions (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 24–40)). Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Lannoo Meulenhoff-Belgium.
Molas-Gallart, J., & Tang, P. (2011). Tracing ‘productive interactions’ to identify social impacts: An example from the social sciences. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 219–226.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world: Foundations and fundamentals of design competence (2nd ed.).
Nicolai, S., Hoy, C., Berliner, T., & Aedy, T. (2015). Projecting progress: Reaching the SDGs by 2030. Overseas Development Institute.
Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., & Stirling, A. (2012). How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Research Policy, 41, 1262–1282.
Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The new management system for a rapidly changing world. Macmillan.
Robinson, J., Berkhout, T., Cayuela, A., & Campbell, A. (2013). Next generation sustainability at the University of British Columbia: The university as societal test-bed for sustainability. In Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities: The role of living laboratories (pp. 27–48).
Scharmer, C. O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Yale University Press.
Stirling, A. (2015). Developing ‘nexus capabilities’: Towards transdisciplinary methodologies. Draft discussion paper. Nexus Network Team, SPRU and STEPS Centre.
United Nations. (2014). The road to dignity by 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet. New York: Report of the UN Secretary General.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Manuel Sierra, Carlos Gregorio Hernández, David Pastor, Xoán Fernández and Leonardo Martins for their comments on this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mataix, C. et al. (2017). Working for Sustainability Transformation in an Academic Environment: The Case of itdUPM. In: Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Molthan-Hill, P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47877-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47877-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47876-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47877-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)