Skip to main content

Crafting Pedagogical Pathways that Disrupt and Transform Anthropocentric Mindsets of Higher Education Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

A key challenge in education for sustainable development is in enabling learners to critically review and re-orient anthropocentric (human-centric) perspectives on sustainability. Sustainability challenges are complex and fluid, and demand non-human centric thinking in constructing viable solutions. The purpose of this study was thus to explore how disruptive pedagogical interventions could be used to challenge and transform anthropocentric mindsets of higher education students. The guiding framework for these pedagogical interventions was transformative learning, which translated into exposure to disorienting dilemmas, followed by individual reflection and subsequent engagement in rational discourse on key sustainability themes. A series of ‘visual cues’ (comprising of disruptive imagery and critical questions) were designed to provoke participants to think more critically about human centric world-views and the interconnectedness, multiplicity and heterogeneity of sustainability. Through the use of Constructivist Grounded Theory, a framework of four conceptual categories emerged, namely, ‘Emotional/cognitive disjuncture’, ‘Recognising principles, practices and themes of sustainability’, ‘Critiquing concepts and contexts of sustainability’ and ‘Reorienting dispositions/perspectives for sustainability’. This framework represents key elements within the process of becoming sustainability [re]oriented, and ultimately provided the evidence that the disruptive pedagogical framework underpinning these visual cue interventions has been effective in moving learners beyond anthropocentric views of the world, and thus, can be used to support learners in becoming sustainability [re]-oriented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (2007). Environmental education and the issue of nature. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 707–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., Vacanti, J. P., Paige, K. T., Upton, J., & Vacanti, C. A. (1997). Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape of a human ear. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 100(2), 297–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, P. B. (2010). Foreword. In P. Jones, D. Selby, & S. Sterling (Eds.), Sustainability education: perspective and practice across higher education. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (nd). Hard Rain Picture Library. http://www.hardrainproject.com/admin_images/yanomami800.jpg. Last Accessed March 7, 2016.

  • Eernstman, N., & Wals, A. E. J. (2013). Locative meaning-making: An arts-based approach to learning for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5(4), 1645–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2009). Learning to be a person in society: Learning to be me. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2012). Learning from everyday life. Human & Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H. (2016). The victims of unsustainability: A challenge to sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 23(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurian, P. A., & Bartlett, R. (2009). Ethics and justice needs for sustainable development. In R. C. Elliot (Ed.), Institutional issues involving ethics and justice (Vol. II). Paris, France: UNESCO, Eolss Publishers. http://www.eolss.net/ebooklib/ViewEbookDetail_1.aspx?catid=14&fileid=E1-37. Last Accessed March 7, 2016.

  • Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice. New directions for adult and continuing education (Vol. 74, pp. 5–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parris, C. L., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (2014). Justice for all? Factors affecting perceptions of environmental and ecological injustice. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 67–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1994). Nature and the crisis of modernity: A critique of contemporary discourse on managing the earth. New York, NY: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S., & Thomas, I. (2006). Education for sustainability: The role of capabilities in guiding university curricula. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2010). Transformative learning and sustainability: Sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014). Shaping the future we want—UN decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014) Final Report. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. J. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M., & McGlynn, C. (2012). Discomforting pedagogies: Emotional tensions, ethical dilemmas and transformative possibilities. British Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M. (2015). Pedagogy of discomfort and its ethical implications: the tensions of ethical violence in social justice education. Ethics and Education, 10(2), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Tillmanns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tillmanns, T., Holland, C. (2017). Crafting Pedagogical Pathways that Disrupt and Transform Anthropocentric Mindsets of Higher Education Students. In: Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L., Castro, P., Newman, J. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47868-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics