Skip to main content

Out of the Great Recession: The Conditions for Prosperity Beyond Individualism and Consumerism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Crisis Conundrum

Abstract

The current economic crisis sheds light on some serious shortcomings in the socio-anthropological view at the foundation of the capitalist modern project as it pursues its ideal of autonomy and material prosperity for the great majority of people. Moving from Arendt’s and Simmel’s critical notes on individualism and consumption, the authors show that the process of economic expansion through individual liberation on the one side and the systemic exploitation of desires through consumption on the other ended up in a condition of personal discontent and collective inequality that threatens the very possibility of prosperity and autonomy for many. Finally, they expose a different vision of individual freedom, one that can constitute a more reliable socio-anthropological ground upon which a much-needed new model of growth may be built.

While the chapter is the outcome of collective research and discussion among the authors, sections may be attributed as follow:

First section after Introduction, “Capitalism and the Modern Project”: Cesare Silla

Second section “Beyond the Dualism of Individual/Social Life: Simmel’s Critical Views of Modern Economy”: Monica Martinelli

“Introduction”, “Conclusion: towards a generative freedom” and third section “Hannah Arendt: Consumer Society is Not a Free Society”: Chiara Giaccardi

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a remarkable common reference in public discourse on the growing importance of the global cities at the expense of shrinking nation-states as the main actors in the world economic arena. See for example S. Coughlan ‘Are cities the new countries?’ BBC News (http://www.bbc.com/news/education-35305586), R. Florida ‘The rise of the mega-region’, in the Wall Street Journal, 12 April 2008, or the article ‘Nations are no longer driving globalization—cities are’ in Quartz (http://qz.com/80657/the-return-of-the-city-state/).

  2. 2.

    For different assessments of the ideal framework behind the modern project and its ‘legitimacy’ see, standing opposite one another, Löwith (1949) and Blumenberg (1983). See also Voegelin (1952), who is close to Löwith in his diagnosis of modernity and Gauchet (1997), who is instead close to Blumenberg.

  3. 3.

    On the idea of the religion of humanity as a fundamental hidden source of modern globalisation and progressive thought see Voegelin (1962) and Manent (2006).

  4. 4.

    Here we face the split between legein and teukein, that is the ability to order our knowledge and experiences by rearranging the meaning (logos) and the ability to properly act (techné); on this point see Castoriadis (1987).

  5. 5.

    An increasing amount of attention is given to the crisis of democracy provoked by the voraciousness of capitalism and the anarchy of global finance by world-renowned sociologists, economists and philosophers such as Bauman (2011), Beck (2009), Nussbaum (2011), Piketty (2013), Sen et al. (2010) and Stiglitz (2012) among many others.

  6. 6.

    Polany (1944) already highlighted that market economies tend to flee from social, institutional and cultural constraints.

  7. 7.

    This is a central concern of classical sociological theory, increasingly left aside by post-Second World War social theory. On this point see Mills (1959). Specifically, the relation between types of man (Menschentums) and social orders (Sozialordnungen) is the cornerstone of Weberian sociology as recognised by Hennis (1988), Scaff (1989), Szakolczai 1998 and Mϋller (2007). On the pivotal role of that theme in Weberian sociology see the special issue published by Studi di Sociologia (Silla 2016) on the occasion of Max Weber’s 150th birthday.

  8. 8.

    See especially the following essays of Simmel: ‘Die beiden Formen des Individualismus’ (1901/02); ‘Goethe’ (1989); ‘Individualismus’ (1957a); ‘Das Individuum und die Freiheit’ (1957b).

  9. 9.

    See Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft. Eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffe (1892–93), 154–56, now included in the collection of Simmel’s writings: Gesamtausgabe; see volumes 3 and 4 of the collection edited by Köhnke, K.C., Frankfurt, Suhrkamp—published in 1989 and 1991 respectively (in this chapter, quotes have been taken from volume 4, 1991, and translated from German to English by the author).

  10. 10.

    Max Weber investigated this point at length and indicated how the problem of social life is first and foremost a spiritual problem; in fact, it informs our ability, as human beings, to think of the social life and look at it in a way that is not only technical.

  11. 11.

    See, for example, the Simmel’s essay on fashion “Die Mode” 1904 in Simmel (2008a).

  12. 12.

    As Simmel wrote in Soziologie, 1908, now in Simmel (1992, 662–663).

  13. 13.

    See especially Simmel (1900/1907), Philosophie des Geldes.

  14. 14.

    Simmel writes in Sociologie: ‘gratitude is the moral memory of humanity’ and constitutes ‘an ideal bridge … with which we can get close to the other subject. … As much as gratitude is a purely personal kind of affection, it becomes, by virtue of its thousand interlaces within society, one of its stronger connecting tools … If all the reactions of gratitude were suddenly cancelled, society as we conceive it would crumble’ (Simmel 1992, 662–63).

  15. 15.

    R. Horning, ‘Social Media, Social Factory’, The New Inquiry, http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/social-media-social-factory/

  16. 16.

    In Arendt’s words, plurality means that ‘we are all the same, that is, human, in such a way that nobody is ever the same as anyone else who ever lived, lives, or will live’ (Arendt 1958, 8).

  17. 17.

    ‘The force of life is fertility’ (Arendt 1958, 5).

  18. 18.

    ‘The living organism is not exhausted when it has provided for its own reproduction, and its “surplus” lies in its potential multiplication’ (Arendt 1958, 108).

  19. 19.

    ‘The product is immediately annihilated by the body’s life process’ (Arendt 1958, 103).

  20. 20.

    ‘If we were truly nothing but members of a consumers’ society, we would no longer live in a world at all but simply be driven by a process in whose ever-recurring cycles things appear and disappear, manifest themselves and vanish, never to last long enough to surround the life process in their midst’ (Arendt 1958, 134).

  21. 21.

    ‘The least durable of tangible things are those needed for the life process itself. Their consumption barely survives the act of their production’ (Arendt 1958, 96). And in so doing we ‘forget’ to take care of the world in common: ‘It is indeed the mark of all laboring that it leaves nothing behind, that the result of its effort is almost as quickly consumed as the effort is spent. And yet this effort, despite its futility, is born of a great urgency and motivated by a more powerful drive than anything else’ (Arendt 1958, 87).

  22. 22.

    ‘Without a world whose very permanence stands in direct contrast to life, this life would never be human’ (Arendt 1958, 155).

  23. 23.

    On the reciprocal implication of ‘memorability’ and ‘durability’ see Arendt (1958, 170).

  24. 24.

    Promise allows stability without claiming control: ‘it corresponds exactly to the existence of a freedom which was given under the condition of non-sovereignty’ (Arendt 1958, 244).

  25. 25.

    See especially Simmel (1991) and (2004).

  26. 26.

    Considering that ‘no action in the social cosmos can remain free of consequences”: for this reason “we should underline our responsibility towards future generations’ (Simmel 1982, 44–45).

References

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory Culture and Society 7: 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1995. Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. In Search of Politics. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Collateral Damage: Social Inequalities in a Global Age. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert et al. 1992. The Good Society, First Vintage Books Edition, A Division of Random House, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, Hans. 1983. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, August. 1875–1877. System of Positive Polity. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2008. The Democratic Rollback. Foreign Affairs 87 (March–April): 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1969. Durkheim’s Individualism and the Intellectuals. Political Studies 17(1): 14–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Erik. 1987. Childhood and Society. London, UK: Paladin Grafton Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauchet, Marcel. 1997. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaccardi, Chiara, and Magatti, Mauro. 2016. La générativité sociale comme réponse à la crise du capitalisme, Revue du Mauss permanente, 17 décembre 2016. http://www.journaldumauss.net/./?La-generativite-sociale-comme

  • Hennis, Wilhelm. 1988. Max Weber: Essays in Reconstruction. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horning, Robert. 2011. Social Media, Social Factory. The New Inquiry, July 29, www.thenewinquiry.com

  • Horvath, Agnes. 2013. Modernism and Charisma. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, Agnes, and Bjorn Thomassen. 2008. Mimetic Errors in Liminal Schismogenesis: On the Political Anthropology of the Trickster. International Political Anthropology 1: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwith, Karl. 1949. Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magatti, Mauro. 2009. Libertà Immaginaria. Le Illusioni del Capitalismo Tecno-Nichilista. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. La Grande Contrazione. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manent, Pierre. 2006. A World Beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Metamorphoses of the City: On the Western Dynamic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Charles Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mϋller, Hans-Peter. 2007. Max Weber: Eine Einführung in sein Werk. Köln: Böhlau UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2013. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polany, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaff, Lawrence A. 1989. Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture, Politics, and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya, Joseph E. Stiglitz, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi. 2010. Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up/The Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. 1976. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silla, Cesare. 2016. Max Weber Our Contemporary: 1864–2014. In Studi di Sociologia (special issue) vol. LIX, n.1, edited by C. Silla, 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. 1901/1902. Die beiden Formen des Individualismus. In Das freie Wort. Frankfurter Halbmonatsschrift für Fortschritt auf alle Gebieten des geistigen Lebens, Frankfurt, 1, 1901/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1923. Schopenhauer e Nietzsche, Milan: Paravia. Or. Ed. Schopenhauer und Nietzsche. Ein Vortragszyklus (1907).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938. L’intuizione della vita, Milan: Bompiani. Or. Ed. Lebensanschauung. Vier metaphysische Kapitel (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1957a. Individualismus (1917/1919). In Brücke und Tür. Essays des Philosophen zur Geschichte, Religion, Kunst und Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: K.F. Koeler.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1957b. Das Individuum und die Freiheit (1913). In Brücke und Tür. Essays des Philosophen zur Geschichte, Religion, Kunst und Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: K.F. Koeler.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. The Philosophy of Money. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. Or. Ed. Philosophie des Geldes (1900/1907).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. La differenziazione sociale, Roma-Bari: Laterza. Or. Ed. Über soziale Differenzierung. Sociologische und psychologische Untersuchungen (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Goethe, 19131/19182. In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 15. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft. Eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffe (1892–93). In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 4. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Soziologie (1908). In G. Simmel, Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 11. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben (1903). In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 7: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908. Band I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Hauptprobleme des Philosophie (1910). In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 14. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Das individuelle Gesetz. Ein Versuch űber das Prinzip der Ethik (1913). In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 12: Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1909–1918. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. La crisi della cultura. In G. Simmel, Sulla Guerra, Roma: Armando. Or. Ed. Die Krisis der Kultur (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. L’etica e i problemi della cultura moderna, Naples: Guida. Ed. Or. Ethik und Probleme der modernen Kultur (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. Die Mode (1904). In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 18: Englischsprachige Veröffentlichungen 1893–1910. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Tendencies in German Life and Thought since 1870 (1902). In Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 18: Englischsprachige Veröffentlichungen 1893–1910. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, Bernard. 2011. The Decadence of Industrial Democracies, Disbelief and Discredit. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2012. The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szakolczai, Arpad. 1998. Max Weber and Michel Foucault: Parallel Life-Works. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Reflexive Historical Sociology. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Genesis of Modernity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, Eric. 1952. The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. World-Empire and the Unity of Mankind. International Affairs 38(2): 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano, Maria. 1958. Persona y democracia. Fundación Maria Zambrano.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giaccardi, C., Martinelli, M., Silla, C. (2017). Out of the Great Recession: The Conditions for Prosperity Beyond Individualism and Consumerism. In: Magatti, M. (eds) The Crisis Conundrum. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47864-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47864-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47863-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47864-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics