Advertisement

Theories for Practice: A Participatory Action Research Approach for the Establishment of the Regional Association for Vocational Teacher Education in Asia (RAVTE)

  • Thomas SchröderEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 24)

Abstract

The RAVTE is a civil society organization with 25 member universities and institutions from East and Southeast Asia, which are actively involved in Vocational Teacher Education (VTE) and in research on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). RAVTE was founded by delegates from 14 universities in nine countries from East and Southeast Asia. They signed a common constitution on the 28th of March 2014 on the premises of Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna in Chiang Mai/Thailand. Since then, RAVTE has established organizational structures, developed a Strategy and Action Plan 2015–2018 and started operations. To date (10th of May 2015), nine additional universities and polytechnics involved in VTE and in research on VET have joined the association. RAVTE, as an organization of the civil society, focusses on improving the VTE and consequently TVET systems in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) – region and beyond. RAVTE intends to support the political agenda with respect to the establishment of the AEC at the end of the year 2015, by contributing with research-based evidence and policy recommendations in order to enhance mobility and mutual acknowledgement of certifications in the region. The article provides an overview of the development of RAVTE, with a focus on the action research processes and the underlying theoretical approaches. Since RAVTE is a start-up, it is considered relevant to present, in the latter part of the article, RAVTE’s emergence as the result of the common development process. This article is not based on research nor does it intend to conduct a policy analysis. It is rather delivering a blueprint for development, which is based on participatory action research and underlying theories.

Keywords

Vocational Education Participatory Action Research General Assembly Competence Development Executive Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. ASEAN. (2008a). ASEAN economic community blueprint. http://www.asean.org/archive/5187-10.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
  3. ASEAN. (2008b). The ASEAN carter. http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
  4. ASEAN. (2012). ASEAN economic community. http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community. Accessed 30 May 2014.
  5. ASEAN. (2014). ASEAN economic community. http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community. Accessed 08 Sep 2015.
  6. Boualinh, S. (2013). Development of standards for vocational teachers at bachelor level in Lao PDR. http://www.tvet-online.asia/series/RaD_vol-2_Soysouvanh.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
  7. Chalmers University of Technology. (2013). Worldwide CDIO initiative. www.cdio.org/. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
  8. Creech, H., & Willard, T. (2001). Strategic intentions: Managing knowledge networks for sustainable development. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  9. Cummings, S., & van Zee, A. (2005). Communities of practice and networks: Reviewing two perspectives on social learning. KM4D Journal, 1(1), 8–22.Google Scholar
  10. Dehnbostel, P. (1998). Begleitforschung von Modellversuchen zwischen Praxisinnovation und Theorieentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 94(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  11. Dehnbostel, P. (2007). Lernen im Prozess der Arbeit. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1950). Reconstruction in philosophy. New York: New American Library of World Literature.Google Scholar
  13. Dittrich, J., Yunos, J., Spöttl, G., & Bukit, M. (2009). Standardisation in TVET teacher education. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Engel, P., & van Zee, A. (2004). Networking for learning: What can participants do? Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management.Google Scholar
  15. Guijt, I., Woodhill, J., Berdegue, J., & Visser, I. (2003). Learning through E-networks and related M&E Issues. Santiago: RIMISP.Google Scholar
  16. Hearn, S., Mendizabel, E. (2011) Not everything that connects is a network. Overseas Development Institute. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/6313.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
  17. Jank, W., & Meyer, H. (1991). Didaktische Modelle. Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.Google Scholar
  18. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 459–473). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  21. Molzberger, G., & Schröder, T. (2005). Von der Praxisentwicklung zur Theoriebildung und wieder zurück – handelnd forschen in einem arbeitsprozessorientierten Qualifizierungsprojekt. Weiterbildung–Zeitschrift für Grundlagen, Praxis und Trends, 16(5), 33–35.Google Scholar
  22. Morrow, K. (2002). In particular: The ICT agenda: Global action plans and local solutions. Leisa Magazine, 18(2), 9–10.Google Scholar
  23. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Padron, M. (1991). Networking and learning. Reflexion, 1(1).Google Scholar
  25. Pinzás, T., & Ranaboldo, C. (2003). ¿La union hace la fuerza? Estudio sobre redes en el desarrollo sostenible. Lima/La Paz: ICCO.Google Scholar
  26. RAVTE. (2015a). Strategy 2015–18. http://ravte.asia/strategy/. Accessed 08 Sep 2015.
  27. RAVTE. (2015b). Members. http://ravte.asia/members/. Accessed 08 Sep 2015.
  28. Songthanapitak, N., & Schröder, T. (2012). A regional approach to the enhancement of practical vocational eompetences of TVET teachers – challenges and perspectives. Conference Proceedings. UNESCO Third International Congress on TVET, Shanghai, 16 May 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Schröder, T. (2009). Arbeits-und Lernaufgaben für die Weiterbildung: eine Lernform für das Lernen im Prozess der Arbeit. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  30. Schröder, T. (2013). Vocational teacher education and research as regional task and challenge in east- and Southeast Asia. http://rcp-platform.com/wp-content/uploads/media/RCP_Conference_Reader.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.
  31. Schröder, T. (2014). Quality enhancement and assurance in research work via scientific coaching: A theoretical basis for inter-institutional and cross-regional research activities in East and Southeast Asia. Available via TVET@Asia. http://www.tvet-online.asia/issue4/schroeder_tvet4.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.
  32. Schröder, T., Carton, M., & Paryono, P. (2015). The world of TVET-networks – How international and regional networks contribute to the development of national TVET-systems. In Ministry of Education/UNESCO (Ed.), Making skills development work for the future (pp. 109–116). Asia-Pacific Conference on Education and Training (ACET), 3–5 Aug 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  33. Toh, M. H. (2009). ASEAN+6 as a step towards an Asian Economic Community. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/15/asean6-as-a-step-towards-an-asian-economic-community/. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
  34. UNESCO. (2006). Hangzhou declaration. http://www.unevoc.unesco.org/go.php?q=Hangzhou+Declaration. Accessed 24 Mar 2016.
  35. UNESCO. (2012). Shanghai consensus. http://www.unevoc.unesco.org/fileadmin/up/217683e.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2015.
  36. UNESCO. (2015). Kuala Lumpur declaration. http://www.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/epr/TVET/ACET_2015/KL_Declaration_fifin.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2016.
  37. Zimmer, G. (1997). Wissenschaftliche Begleitung von Modellversuchen: auf der Suche nach der Theorie innovativer Handlungen. Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 26(1), 27–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations