Advertisement

Policy Borrowing in Vocational Education and Training (VET) – VET System Typologies and the “6 P Strategy” for Transfer Analysis

  • Matthias PilzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 24)

Abstract

The issue of exporting VET systems is currently very topical in the international debate. It is, however, surprising that there is virtually no recent research into such areas as practicability, successes achieved, problems encountered, and long-term impact.

If a transfer approach should be successful, there must be at a first stage a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the diverse needs and perspectives of the local stakeholder groups. In line with this logic, the paper presents an analytical tool that can be used to categorise individual countries in terms of the way VET is perceived and designed within the specific socio-cultural context. This also enables initial indicators of potential needs to be identified.

The next stage in the paper is, to focus on the actual transfer of all or part of a VET system from one country to another. There has so far been no adequate explanation of how this might be done. The existing empirical findings show that transfer is a major challenge for all those involved. The approach is intended to provide a structure for such transfers and identify possible problems or obstacles before the process gets under way. This approach, labelled as the “6 P strategy”, is based on the findings documented in the literature and supplemented with the author’s experience of a range of transfer projects.

Keywords

Vocational Training Skilled Staff Skill Formation Employment System Vocational Training System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. S. (1998). Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 79–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allmendinger, J. (1989). Educational systems and labour market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231–250.Google Scholar
  3. Aring, M. (2014). Innovations in quality apprenticeships for high-skilled manufacturing jobs in the United States at BMW, Siemens, Volkswagen. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_244374.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  4. Arnold, R. (1985). Das duale System – Ein Modell für den Aufbau leistungsfähiger Berufsbildungssysteme in Entwicklungsländern? Zeitschrift für erziehungs- und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung, 2, 343–369.Google Scholar
  5. Barabasch, A., & Rauner, F. (2012). Work and education in America – The art of integration. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barabasch, A., & Wolf, S. (2011). Internationaler policy transfer in der Berufsbildung –Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und theoretische Grundlagen am Beispiel deutscher Transferaktivitäten. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 14(2), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, S., & Pilz, M. (2009). Benefits of VET. In Hippach-Schneider U, Toth B (Eds.) ReferNet research report – Deutschland/Germany (pp. 6–49). Bonn: BIBB.Google Scholar
  8. BIBB. (2014). Bilaterale Kooperationen. https://www.bibb.de/en/govet_2910.php. Accessed 19 Apr 2016.
  9. Biermann, H. (1994). Das Duale System – (k)ein Exportschlager…. Berufsbildung – Zeitschrift für Praxis und Theorie in Betrieb und Schule, 26, 2–3.Google Scholar
  10. Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Blöndal, S., Field, S., & Girouard, N. (2002). Investment in human capital through upper secondary and and tertiary education. OECD Economic Studies (34), I. https://www.oecd.org/eco/labour/2640202.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  12. Blossfeld, H. P. (1994). Different systems of vocational training and transitions from school to career – The German dual system in cross-national comparison. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), The determinants of transitions in youth (pp. 26–36). Berlin: CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
  13. Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., Méhaut, P., & Winch, C. (2011). Knowledge, skills and competence in the European labour market – What’s in a vocational qualification? New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Busemeyer, M., & Trampusch, C. (2012). The comparative political economy of collective skill formation. In M. Busemeyer & M. Trampusch (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 3–38). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clement, U. (2012). Berufsbildung in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 108(1), 93–108.Google Scholar
  16. Crouch, C., Finegold, D., & Sako, M. (1999). Are skills the answer? The political economy of skill creation in advanced industrial countries. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2008). Institutions and collective actors in the provision of training: Historical and cross-national comparisons. In K. U. Mayer & H. Solga (Eds.), Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives (pp. 21–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deißinger, T. (1995). Das Konzept der „Qualifizierungsstile“ als kategoriale Basis idealtypischer Ordnungsschemata zur Charakterisierung und Unterscheidung von „Berufsbildungssystemen“. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 91(4), 367–387.Google Scholar
  19. Euler, D. (2013). Das duale System in Deutschland – Vorbild für einen Transfer ins Ausland? Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  20. Frommberger, D., & Reinisch, H. (1999). Ordnungsschemata zur Kennzeichnung und zum Vergleich von „Berufsbildungssystemen“ in deutschsprachigen Beiträgen zur international-vergleichenden Berufsbildungsforschung: Methodologische Fragen und Reflexionen. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 95(3), 323–343.Google Scholar
  21. Géhin, J. P. (2007). Vocational education in France. A turbulent history and peripheral role. In L. Clarke & C. Winch (Eds.), Vocational education. International approaches, developments and systems (pp. 34–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. GOVET. (2014) Über uns: Zentralstelle für internationale Berufsbildungskooperation (GOVET). https://www.bibb.de/en/govet_2350.php. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  23. Grollmann, P. (2009). Comparative research on technical and vocational education and training (TVET) – Methodological considerations. In F. Rauner & R. Maclean (Eds.), Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research (pp. 253–259). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  25. Haering, B., Rageth, L., Rageth, G., & Pohl, N. (2014). Pilot project Swiss VET initiative India: Cooperation between Switzerland and India in the field of vocational education and training 2009–2013. Evaluation final report. Zürich: Econcept AG.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Hummelsheim, S., & Baur, M. (2014). The German dual system of initial vocational education and training and its potential for transfer to Asia. Prospects, 44(2), 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kariya, T. (2011). Japanese solutions to the equity and efficiency dilemma? Secondary schools, inequity and the arrival of ‘universal’ higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krohwinkel-Karlsson, A. K., & Sjögren, E. (2008). Identifying need through expressions of demand. Public Management Review, 10(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keating, J. (2009). Matching supply of and demand for skills: International perspectives. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 35(3), 528–560.Google Scholar
  31. Kis, V., Hoeckel, K., & Santiago, P. (2009). Learning for jobs – OECD review of vocational education and training: Mexico. http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/43277304.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
  32. Kopatz, S., & Pilz, M. (2015). The academic takes it all? A comparison of returns to investment in education between graduates and apprentices in Canada. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(4), 308–325.Google Scholar
  33. Lasonen, J., & Gordon, J. (2009). Improving the attractiveness and image of VET. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Modernising vocational education and training: Fourth report on vocational training research in Europe – Background report (pp. 15–88).http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/fr/node/10986. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.Google Scholar
  34. Lauterbach, U. (2003). Exportschlager duale Ausbildung? Erfahrungen aus dem Internationalen Fachkräfteaustausch (IFKA) der Carl Duisberg Gesellschaft und des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. In G. Cramer (Ed.), Jahrbuch Ausbildungspraxis 2003. Erfolgreiches Ausbildungsmanagement (pp. 54–57). Köln: Wolter Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Lehmann, W. (2012). Youth apprenticeships in Canada: Context, structures and apprentices’ experience. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 25–41). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehrotra, S. (2014). India’s skills challenge: Reforming vocational education and training to harness the demographic dividend. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehrotra, S., Raman, R. K., Kumra, N., & Röß, D. (2014). Vocational education and training reform in India: Business needs in India and lessons to be learned from Germany. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  38. Muehlemann, S., & Wolter, S. C. (2011). Firm-sponsored training and poaching externalities in regional labor markets. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(6), 560–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Müller, W., & Shavit, Y. (1998). The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process: A comparative study of qualifications and occupations in thirteen countries. In W. Müller & Y. Shavit (Eds.), From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations (pp. 1–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pilz, M. (2009). Initial vocational training from a company perspective: A comparison of British and German in-house training cultures. Vocations and Learning, 2(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pilz, M. (2012). International comparative research into Vocational Training: Methods and approaches. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 561–588). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pilz, M. (Ed.). (2016). India: Preparation for the world of work: Education system and school to work transition. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  43. Pilz, M., & Alexander, P. J. (2011). The transition from education to employment in the context of social stratification in Japan – A view from the outside. Comparative Education, 47(2), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pilz, M., & Li, J. M. (2014). Tracing teutonic footprints in VET around the world? The skills development strategies of German companies in the USA, China and India. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(8), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pilz, M., Uma, G., & Venkatram, R. (2015). Skill development in the informal sector in India: The case of street food vendors. International Review of Education, 61(2), 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Posselt, T., Salameh, N., Preissler, A., & Hudak, S. (2012). Treibende und Hemmende Faktoren im Berufsbildungsexport aus Sicht deutscher Anbieter. In Fraunhofer MOEZ (Ed.). Leipzig: Fraunhofer MOEZ.Google Scholar
  47. Rauner, F., & Wittig, W. (2009). Synthesebericht und Handlungsempfehlungen. In F. Rauner (Ed.), Steuerung beruflicher Bildung im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 23–111). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  48. Schaack, K. (1997). Die Exportierbarkeit des dualen Systems. In K. Schaack & R. Tippelt (Eds.), Strategien der internationalen Berufsbildung (pp. 197–233). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
  49. Schippers, S. (2009). Systemberatung zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit: eine wirkungsorientierte Analyse der „Mubarak-Kohl-Initiative” in Ägypten. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Schmidt, H., & Benner, H. (1989). Das duale System der Berufsausbildung – ein Exportschlager? – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übertragung eines Berufsbildungssystems? In R. Arnold & A. Lipsmeier (Eds.), Betriebspädagogik in nationaler und internationaler Perspektive (pp. 341–353). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. Shavit, Y., & Müller, W. (2000). Vocational secondary education, tracking, and social stratification. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of sociology of education (pp. 437–452). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Shi, W. P. (2012). Development of TVET in China: Issues and challenges. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 85–95). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh, M. (2012). India’s national skills development policy and implications for TVET and lifelong learning. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 179–211). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steedman, H. (2012). Overview of apprenticeship systems and issues. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  55. Stockmann, R. (2013). Metaevaluierung Berufsbildung: Ziele, Wirkungen und Erfolgsfaktoren der deutschen Berufsbildungszusammenarbeit. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  56. Stockmann, R., & Silverstrini, S. (2013). Berufsbildungsförderung im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 109(2), 170–190.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor, A. (2006). The challenges of partnership in school-to-work transition. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(3), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thelen, K., & Kume, I. (1999). The rise of nonmarket training regimes: Germany and Japan compared. Journal of Japanese Studies, 25(1), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thomann, B., & Wiechert, M. (2013). Berufsbildungszusammenarbeit aus einer Hand. Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis., 42(5), 35–37.Google Scholar
  60. Verfürth, M., & Diart, M. (2013). Ausbildungsengagement deutscher Firmen in Indien: Impulse für den Aufbau eines leistungsfähigen Qualifizierungssystems? Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 5(42), 20–23.Google Scholar
  61. Wolf, S. (2011). Arbeitskulturen und der Transfer von Berufsbildungselementen in andere Länder. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 107(4), 543–567.Google Scholar
  62. Young, M., & Raffe, D. (1998). The four strategies for promoting parity of esteem. In J. Lasonen & M. Young (Eds.), Strategies for achieving parity of esteem in European upper secondary education. Final report (pp. 35–46). Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University.Google Scholar
  63. Zirkle, C., & Martin, L. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in the United States. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 9–23). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhls für Wirtschafts- und SozialpädagogikUniversität zu KölnKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations