Abstract
The issue of exporting VET systems is currently very topical in the international debate. It is, however, surprising that there is virtually no recent research into such areas as practicability, successes achieved, problems encountered, and long-term impact.
If a transfer approach should be successful, there must be at a first stage a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the diverse needs and perspectives of the local stakeholder groups. In line with this logic, the paper presents an analytical tool that can be used to categorise individual countries in terms of the way VET is perceived and designed within the specific socio-cultural context. This also enables initial indicators of potential needs to be identified.
The next stage in the paper is, to focus on the actual transfer of all or part of a VET system from one country to another. There has so far been no adequate explanation of how this might be done. The existing empirical findings show that transfer is a major challenge for all those involved. The approach is intended to provide a structure for such transfers and identify possible problems or obstacles before the process gets under way. This approach, labelled as the “6 P strategy”, is based on the findings documented in the literature and supplemented with the author’s experience of a range of transfer projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Müller and Shavit’s slightly different assessment (Müller and Shavit <CitationRef CitationID="CR39" >1998</Citation Ref>, p. 14; medium stratification) is the result of their three-point scale; we are using a two-point scale here.
- 2.
These findings diverge from those of Müller and Shavit (<CitationRef CitationID="CR39" >1998</Citation Ref>, p. 14; low stratification), who argue primarily at the formal level.
- 3.
By contrast with informal skill formation, the formal VET system in India is less important in quantitative terms (Pilz et al. <CitationRef CitationID="CR45" >2015</Citation Ref>).
- 4.
To determine the scale and/or relevance of a particular aspect of the VET system as a whole (see discussion above), the relative number of participants in a programme can be quantified as a proportion of all participants in VET. This proportion can then be reflected in terms of the size of the relevant symbol. Thus, a large symbol may represent extensive uptake (for example, 80–100 % of an age cohort in VET complete the relevant part of the system), while a small symbol signifies a smaller importance (below 50 %, for example).
References
Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. S. (1998). Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 79–119.
Allmendinger, J. (1989). Educational systems and labour market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231–250.
Aring, M. (2014). Innovations in quality apprenticeships for high-skilled manufacturing jobs in the United States at BMW, Siemens, Volkswagen. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_244374.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
Arnold, R. (1985). Das duale System – Ein Modell für den Aufbau leistungsfähiger Berufsbildungssysteme in Entwicklungsländern? Zeitschrift für erziehungs- und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung, 2, 343–369.
Barabasch, A., & Rauner, F. (2012). Work and education in America – The art of integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Barabasch, A., & Wolf, S. (2011). Internationaler policy transfer in der Berufsbildung –Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und theoretische Grundlagen am Beispiel deutscher Transferaktivitäten. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 14(2), 283–307.
Berger, S., & Pilz, M. (2009). Benefits of VET. In Hippach-Schneider U, Toth B (Eds.) ReferNet research report – Deutschland/Germany (pp. 6–49). Bonn: BIBB.
BIBB. (2014). Bilaterale Kooperationen. https://www.bibb.de/en/govet_2910.php. Accessed 19 Apr 2016.
Biermann, H. (1994). Das Duale System – (k)ein Exportschlager…. Berufsbildung – Zeitschrift für Praxis und Theorie in Betrieb und Schule, 26, 2–3.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Blöndal, S., Field, S., & Girouard, N. (2002). Investment in human capital through upper secondary and and tertiary education. OECD Economic Studies (34), I. https://www.oecd.org/eco/labour/2640202.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
Blossfeld, H. P. (1994). Different systems of vocational training and transitions from school to career – The German dual system in cross-national comparison. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), The determinants of transitions in youth (pp. 26–36). Berlin: CEDEFOP.
Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., Méhaut, P., & Winch, C. (2011). Knowledge, skills and competence in the European labour market – What’s in a vocational qualification? New York/London: Routledge.
Busemeyer, M., & Trampusch, C. (2012). The comparative political economy of collective skill formation. In M. Busemeyer & M. Trampusch (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 3–38). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Clement, U. (2012). Berufsbildung in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 108(1), 93–108.
Crouch, C., Finegold, D., & Sako, M. (1999). Are skills the answer? The political economy of skill creation in advanced industrial countries. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2008). Institutions and collective actors in the provision of training: Historical and cross-national comparisons. In K. U. Mayer & H. Solga (Eds.), Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives (pp. 21–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deißinger, T. (1995). Das Konzept der „Qualifizierungsstile“ als kategoriale Basis idealtypischer Ordnungsschemata zur Charakterisierung und Unterscheidung von „Berufsbildungssystemen“. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 91(4), 367–387.
Euler, D. (2013). Das duale System in Deutschland – Vorbild für einen Transfer ins Ausland? Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Frommberger, D., & Reinisch, H. (1999). Ordnungsschemata zur Kennzeichnung und zum Vergleich von „Berufsbildungssystemen“ in deutschsprachigen Beiträgen zur international-vergleichenden Berufsbildungsforschung: Methodologische Fragen und Reflexionen. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 95(3), 323–343.
Géhin, J. P. (2007). Vocational education in France. A turbulent history and peripheral role. In L. Clarke & C. Winch (Eds.), Vocational education. International approaches, developments and systems (pp. 34–48). London: Routledge.
GOVET. (2014) Über uns: Zentralstelle für internationale Berufsbildungskooperation (GOVET). https://www.bibb.de/en/govet_2350.php. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
Grollmann, P. (2009). Comparative research on technical and vocational education and training (TVET) – Methodological considerations. In F. Rauner & R. Maclean (Eds.), Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research (pp. 253–259). Dordrecht: Springer.
Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). Oxford: Pergamon.
Haering, B., Rageth, L., Rageth, G., & Pohl, N. (2014). Pilot project Swiss VET initiative India: Cooperation between Switzerland and India in the field of vocational education and training 2009–2013. Evaluation final report. Zürich: Econcept AG.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Hummelsheim, S., & Baur, M. (2014). The German dual system of initial vocational education and training and its potential for transfer to Asia. Prospects, 44(2), 279–296.
Kariya, T. (2011). Japanese solutions to the equity and efficiency dilemma? Secondary schools, inequity and the arrival of ‘universal’ higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2), 241–266.
Krohwinkel-Karlsson, A. K., & Sjögren, E. (2008). Identifying need through expressions of demand. Public Management Review, 10(2), 197–220.
Keating, J. (2009). Matching supply of and demand for skills: International perspectives. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 35(3), 528–560.
Kis, V., Hoeckel, K., & Santiago, P. (2009). Learning for jobs – OECD review of vocational education and training: Mexico. http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/43277304.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.
Kopatz, S., & Pilz, M. (2015). The academic takes it all? A comparison of returns to investment in education between graduates and apprentices in Canada. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(4), 308–325.
Lasonen, J., & Gordon, J. (2009). Improving the attractiveness and image of VET. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Modernising vocational education and training: Fourth report on vocational training research in Europe – Background report (pp. 15–88).http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/fr/node/10986. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.
Lauterbach, U. (2003). Exportschlager duale Ausbildung? Erfahrungen aus dem Internationalen Fachkräfteaustausch (IFKA) der Carl Duisberg Gesellschaft und des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. In G. Cramer (Ed.), Jahrbuch Ausbildungspraxis 2003. Erfolgreiches Ausbildungsmanagement (pp. 54–57). Köln: Wolter Kluwer.
Lehmann, W. (2012). Youth apprenticeships in Canada: Context, structures and apprentices’ experience. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 25–41). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Mehrotra, S. (2014). India’s skills challenge: Reforming vocational education and training to harness the demographic dividend. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Mehrotra, S., Raman, R. K., Kumra, N., & Röß, D. (2014). Vocational education and training reform in India: Business needs in India and lessons to be learned from Germany. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Muehlemann, S., & Wolter, S. C. (2011). Firm-sponsored training and poaching externalities in regional labor markets. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(6), 560–570.
Müller, W., & Shavit, Y. (1998). The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process: A comparative study of qualifications and occupations in thirteen countries. In W. Müller & Y. Shavit (Eds.), From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations (pp. 1–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pilz, M. (2009). Initial vocational training from a company perspective: A comparison of British and German in-house training cultures. Vocations and Learning, 2(1), 57–74.
Pilz, M. (2012). International comparative research into Vocational Training: Methods and approaches. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 561–588). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Pilz, M. (Ed.). (2016). India: Preparation for the world of work: Education system and school to work transition. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Pilz, M., & Alexander, P. J. (2011). The transition from education to employment in the context of social stratification in Japan – A view from the outside. Comparative Education, 47(2), 265–280.
Pilz, M., & Li, J. M. (2014). Tracing teutonic footprints in VET around the world? The skills development strategies of German companies in the USA, China and India. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(8), 745–763.
Pilz, M., Uma, G., & Venkatram, R. (2015). Skill development in the informal sector in India: The case of street food vendors. International Review of Education, 61(2), 191–209.
Posselt, T., Salameh, N., Preissler, A., & Hudak, S. (2012). Treibende und Hemmende Faktoren im Berufsbildungsexport aus Sicht deutscher Anbieter. In Fraunhofer MOEZ (Ed.). Leipzig: Fraunhofer MOEZ.
Rauner, F., & Wittig, W. (2009). Synthesebericht und Handlungsempfehlungen. In F. Rauner (Ed.), Steuerung beruflicher Bildung im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 23–111). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Schaack, K. (1997). Die Exportierbarkeit des dualen Systems. In K. Schaack & R. Tippelt (Eds.), Strategien der internationalen Berufsbildung (pp. 197–233). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Schippers, S. (2009). Systemberatung zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit: eine wirkungsorientierte Analyse der „Mubarak-Kohl-Initiative” in Ägypten. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.
Schmidt, H., & Benner, H. (1989). Das duale System der Berufsausbildung – ein Exportschlager? – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übertragung eines Berufsbildungssystems? In R. Arnold & A. Lipsmeier (Eds.), Betriebspädagogik in nationaler und internationaler Perspektive (pp. 341–353). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
Shavit, Y., & Müller, W. (2000). Vocational secondary education, tracking, and social stratification. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of sociology of education (pp. 437–452). New York: Springer.
Shi, W. P. (2012). Development of TVET in China: Issues and challenges. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 85–95). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Singh, M. (2012). India’s national skills development policy and implications for TVET and lifelong learning. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 179–211). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Steedman, H. (2012). Overview of apprenticeship systems and issues. Geneva: ILO.
Stockmann, R. (2013). Metaevaluierung Berufsbildung: Ziele, Wirkungen und Erfolgsfaktoren der deutschen Berufsbildungszusammenarbeit. Münster: Waxmann.
Stockmann, R., & Silverstrini, S. (2013). Berufsbildungsförderung im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 109(2), 170–190.
Taylor, A. (2006). The challenges of partnership in school-to-work transition. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(3), 319–336.
Thelen, K., & Kume, I. (1999). The rise of nonmarket training regimes: Germany and Japan compared. Journal of Japanese Studies, 25(1), 33–64.
Thomann, B., & Wiechert, M. (2013). Berufsbildungszusammenarbeit aus einer Hand. Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis., 42(5), 35–37.
Verfürth, M., & Diart, M. (2013). Ausbildungsengagement deutscher Firmen in Indien: Impulse für den Aufbau eines leistungsfähigen Qualifizierungssystems? Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 5(42), 20–23.
Wolf, S. (2011). Arbeitskulturen und der Transfer von Berufsbildungselementen in andere Länder. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 107(4), 543–567.
Young, M., & Raffe, D. (1998). The four strategies for promoting parity of esteem. In J. Lasonen & M. Young (Eds.), Strategies for achieving parity of esteem in European upper secondary education. Final report (pp. 35–46). Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University.
Zirkle, C., & Martin, L. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in the United States. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 9–23). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pilz, M. (2017). Policy Borrowing in Vocational Education and Training (VET) – VET System Typologies and the “6 P Strategy” for Transfer Analysis. In: Pilz, M. (eds) Vocational Education and Training in Times of Economic Crisis. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47856-2_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47856-2_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47854-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47856-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)