Skip to main content

Responsibilities of OSPs from a Business Ethics Point of View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Responsibilities of Online Service Providers

Part of the book series: Law, Governance and Technology Series ((LGTS,volume 31))

Abstract

Certain parts of the debate on the ethical responsibilities of OSPs strike one with their heavily moralising and accusing tone. However, from a business ethics point of view, any assessment of these responsibilities should keep the pivotal role of economic competition in mind. Its exact degree or intensity may vary, but in general, economic competition limits the options of actors, which has consequences for their ethical responsibilities as well. I argue, first, that the OSP discussion should rest less on purely individual concepts of responsibility, but more on concepts of group agency. Second, there are still ways of ascribing responsibility to companies compatible with competition, as much of the debates on Corporate Social Responsibility show.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Chomsky 1999; Chossudovsky 2003; Comte-Sponville 2004; Badiou 2010.

  2. 2.

    Buchanan 1975/2000; Brennan and Buchanan 1985; for the ethical dimension of Buchanan’s work see Luetge 2006.

  3. 3.

    Axelrod 1984; for the systematic use of the stag hunt game cf. Binmore 1994, 1998, 2005.

  4. 4.

    This behaviour has been confirmed in experimental studies such as GĂĽrerk et al. 2006; Binmore 2010 or already Andreoni 1988.

  5. 5.

    And in related concepts like Corporate Citizenship, Creating Shared Value or Corporate Social Accounting.

  6. 6.

    Especially important in Germany was the reformulation of the §30 Ordnungswidrigkeitengesetz in 2002.

  7. 7.

    For the following, cf. Mukerji and Luetge 2014.

  8. 8.

    Cf. already French 1984, 13f.

Bibliography

  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2010). The communist hypothesis. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, E. (2015). Google’s greed: How the search giant’s lust for information is impacting your search results. http://firstpagesage.com/seo-blog/thought-leadership/googles-greed-search-giants-lust-information-impacting-search-results/#sthash.tEiEE1Yy.dpuf. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Binmore, K. (1994). Game theory and the social contract: Vol. 1: Playing fair. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1998). Game theory and the social contract: Vol. 2: Just playing. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2005). Natural justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2010). Social norms or social preferences? Mind and Society, 9, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. (1999). Presidential address: Does business ethics rest on a mistake? Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 583–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brault, J. (2013). Google est-il dangereux pour la dĂ©mocratie?. https://www.lesaffaires.com/blogues/julien-brault/google-est-il-dangereux-pour-la-democratie/554735. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M. (2003). The globalization of poverty and the new world order. Oro: Global Outlook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte-Sponville, A. (2004). Le capitalisme est-il moral? Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. D., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. D., & Dunfee, T. W. (2000). Book review dialogue: Tightening the ties that bind – Defending a contractarian approach to business ethics. American Business Law Journal, 37, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eucken, W. (1949). Die Wettbewerbsordnung und ihre Verwirklichung. ORDO, 2, 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2010, November 18). In China’s orbit. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, p 32f., pp. 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • GĂĽrerk, Ă–., Irlenbusch, B., & Rockenbach, B. (2006). The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science, 312, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, D. (2014). Suchmaschine Googles Gier kennt keine Grenzen. http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/digital/-suchmaschine-googles-gier-kennt-keine-grenzen-1455016. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). Competition as a discovery procedure. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P., Kaptein, M., & Oosterhout, H. (2004). Ties that grind? Corroborating a typology of social contracting problems. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(3), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P., Oosterhout, H., & Kaptein, M. (2006). Foundations and applications for contractualist business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K., & LĂĽtge, C. (2004/2013). EinfĂĽhrung in die Wirtschaftsethik (3rd ed.). MĂĽnster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. (2013). A gigantic parasite: Forget the touchy feely posturing. Google’s tiny tax bill shows how greedy and ruthless it really is. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2314375/A-gigantic-parasite-Forget-touchy-feely-posturing-Googles-tiny-tax-shows-greedy-ruthless-really-is.html. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Jones, E. L. (1981). The European miracle: Environments, economies, and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1917). How to organise competition. In: Collected works, (4th English Edition translated by Yuri Sdobnikov and George Hanna and edited by George Hanna) (vol 26, pp. 404–415). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2005). Economic ethics, business ethics and the idea of mutual advantages. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2006). An economic rationale for a work and savings ethic? J. Buchanan’s Late Works and Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2014). Ethik des Wettbewerbs: Ăśber Konkurrenz und Moral. MĂĽnchen: Beck.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2015a). Order ethics vs. moral surplus: What holds a society together? Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2015b). Ethique et concurrence dans l’économie de marchĂ©. In D. de Courcelles (Ed.), Actes pour une Ă©conomie juste (pp. 211–220). Paris: LĂ©mieux Editeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2016). Order ethics and the problem of social glue. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 12(2), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C., ArmbrĂĽster, T., & MĂĽller, J. (2016). Order ethics: Bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 687–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C., & Mukerji, N. (Eds.). (2016). Order ethics: An ethical framework for the social market economy. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (2006). The bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, I. (1981). China’s examination hell: The civil service examinations of Imperial China. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, N., & Luetge, C. (2014). Responsibility, order ethics, and group agency. Archiv fĂĽr Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 100(2), 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narveson, J. (2002). Collective responsibility. Journal of Ethics, 6(2), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I., Winning, Av., Sardison, M., & Girlich, K. (2009). Nachhaltigkeit in der Mineralölindustrie: Theorie und Praxis freiwilliger Selbstverpflichtungen. Wirtschaftsethik-Studie Nr. 2009-1 des Lehrstuhls fĂĽr Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, A. (2010). Googles Gier opfert die Netzneutralität. https://netzpolitik.org/2010/googles-gier-opfert-die-netzneutralitat/. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Rau, M. (2008). No good can come of Microsoft’s greed. http://articles.dailypress.com/2008-02-11/features/0802110006_1_windows-media-digital-production-yahoo. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York : Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R. (1997). Grounding hypernorms: Towards a contractarian theory of business ethics. Economics and Philosophy, 13, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R. (2001). How binding the ties? Business ethics as integrative social contracts. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucellai, G. (1772). Ricordanze, Padua

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. (2011). Steve jobs, the mean dictator – Paul Graham. http://www.zdnet.com/article/steve-jobs-the-mean-dictator-paul-graham/. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • The Economist. (2014). Internet monopolies: Everybody wants to rule the world. http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21635077-online-businesses-can-grow-very-large-very-fastit-what-makes-them-exciting-does-it-also-make. Accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Wempe, B. (2004). On the use of the social contract model in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2008a). Contractarian business ethics: Credentials and design criteria. Organization Studies, 29, 1337–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, B. (2008b). Four design criteria for any future contractarian theory of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WSJ.com. (2012). Why facebook is almost as greedy as Bernie Madoff. http://www.wsj.com/video/why-facebook-is-almost-as-greedy-as-bernie-madoff/5945C59A-102F-4027-8AFE-4F127EDC6589.html. Accessed 12 May 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Luetge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luetge, C. (2017). Responsibilities of OSPs from a Business Ethics Point of View. In: Taddeo, M., Floridi, L. (eds) The Responsibilities of Online Service Providers. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47852-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47851-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47852-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics