Skip to main content

Numerical Modeling Aspects of Buried Pipeline—Fault Crossing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 44))

Abstract

Onshore buried steel pipelines transporting oil and gas play a major role in the energy supply chain. Hence, when seismic areas are transversed, fault crossing might be inevitable, which may heavily endanger the pipeline integrity. Thus, the design of buried pipelines at fault crossing remains a research topic of great interest both for the industry and the academia. Experimental, analytical and numerical approaches are used for that purpose. In this chapter, the numerical modeling of pipelines subjected to faulting is addressed and the advantages and disadvantages of the available numerical approaches are highlighted. The impact of fault type on the pipeline mechanical behavior is investigated and numerical considerations, such as the geometrical nonlinearity, the ovalization and the internal pressure are evaluated using a simple, well-established and reliable numerical approach. The outcome of this study provides useful information and guidelines to practicing engineers for the analysis and design of buried pipelines at fault crossings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. O’Rourke MJ, Liu X (2012) Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines. Monograph No. 4. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jennings PC (1971) Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake February 7, 1971. California Institute of Technology Report, EERI 71-02, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nakata T, Hasuda K (1995) Active fault I 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake. Kagaku 65:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  4. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (1999) Kocaeli, Turkey Earthquake of August 17. EERI Special Earthquake Report, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  5. Takada S, Nakayama M, Ueno J, Tajima C (1999) Report on Taiwan Earthquake. RCUSS, Earthquake Laboratory of Kobe University, Kobe

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newmark NM, Hall WJ (1975) Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement. In: Proceedings of U.S. National conference on earthquake engineering, 18–20 June 1975, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy RP, Chow AW, Williamson RA (1977) Fault movement effects of buried oil pipeline. ASCE J Transp Eng 103:617–633

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy RP, Kincaid RH (1983) Fault crossing design for buried gas oil pipeline. In: ASME, Proceeding of the PVP conference 1983, vol 77. ASME, New York, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang LRL, Yeh YA (1985) A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipelines subjected to vertical fault movement. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13:75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takada S, Hassani N, Fukuda K (2001) A new proposal for simplified design of buried steel pipes crossing active faults. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:1243–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karamitros DK, Bouckovalas GD, Kouretzis GD (2007) Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karamitros DK, Bouckovalas GD, Kouretzis GD, Gkesouli V (2011) An analytical method for strength verification of buried steel pipelines at normal fault crossings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:1452–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trifonov OV, Cherniy VP (2010) A semi-analytical approach to a nonlinear stress-strain analysis of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1298–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trifonov OV, Cherniy VP (2012) Elastoplastic stress-strain analysis of buried steel pipelines subjected to fault displacement with account for service loads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 33(1):54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vougioukas EA, Theodossis C, Carydis PG (1979) Seismic analysis of buried pipelines subjected to vertical fault movement. ASCE J Tech Councils 105(TCI): 432–441

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ariman T, Lee BJ (1991) Tension/bending behavior of buried pipelines under large ground deformation in active faults. In: U.S. conference on lifeline earthquake engineering, technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering, vol 4. ASCE, New York, pp 226–233

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joshi S, Prashant A, Deb A, Jain SK (2011) Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:930–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gantes CJ, Melissianos VE (2012) Numerical analysis of buried steel pipelines. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Balkans conference on challenges of civil engineering. BCCCE, Tirana

    Google Scholar 

  19. Melissianos VE, Gantes CJ (2014) On the efficiency of flexible joints in mitigating the consequences of seismic fault activation on buried pipelines. In: Proceedings of the Qatar foundation annual research conference 2014, ARC ’14, Doha

    Google Scholar 

  20. Melissianos VE, Gantes CJ, Kalfantis PP (2014) Upheaval buckling risk assessment of buried steel pipelines due to reverse seismic fault activation. In: Proceedings of the 8th National conference on steel structures, Tripoli

    Google Scholar 

  21. Melissianos VE, Vamvatsikos D, Gantes CJ (2015) Probabilistic assessment of innovative mitigating measures for buried steel pipeline—fault crossing. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 pressure vessels & piping conference, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  22. ALA American Lifelines Alliance (2001) Guideline for the design of buried steel pipe—July 2001 (with addenda through February 2005). American Society of Civil Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eurocode 8: EN 1998-4 (2006) Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 4: Silos, tanks and pipelines, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  24. ASCE (1984) Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. Committee on gas and liquid fuel life-lines, technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering. ASCE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kokavessis NK, Anagnostidis GS (2006) Finite element modeling of buried pipelines subjected to seismic loads: soil structure interaction using contact elements. In: Proceedings of the ASME PVP conference, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  26. Odina L, Tan R (2009) Seismic fault displacement of buried pipelines using continuum finite element methods. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vazouras P, Karamanos SA, Dakoulas P (2010) Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(11):1361–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vazouras P, Karamanos SA, Dakoulas P (2012) Mechanical behavior of buried steel pipes crossing active strike-slip faults. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 41:164–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vazouras P, Karamanos SA, Dakoulas P (2015) Pipe-soil interaction and pipeline performance under strike-slip fault movements. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 72:48–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang J, Liang Z, Han CJ (2014) Buckling behavior analysis of buried gas pipeline under strike-slip fault displacement. J Natural Gas Sci Eng 21:901–928

    Google Scholar 

  31. Trifonov OV (2015) Numerical stress-strain analysis of buried steel pipelines crossing active strike-slip faults with an emphasis on fault modeling aspects. ASCE J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 6(1):04014008

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Uckan E, Akbas B, Shen J, Rou W, Paolacci F, O’Rourke M (2015) A simplified analysis model for determining the seismic response of buried steel pipes at strike-slip fault crossings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 75:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Takada S, Liang JW, Tengyan L (1998) Shell-mode response of buried pipelines to large fault movements. J Struct Eng 44A:1637–1646

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gantes CJ, Bouckovalas G (2013) Seismic verification of the high pressure natural gas pipeline Komotini-Alexandroupolis-Kipi in areas of active fault crossing. Struct Eng Int 2:204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ADINA R & D Inc. (2006) Theory and modeling guide. Volume I: ADINA, Report ARD 08-7. ADINA R & D Inc., Watertown—Boston

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sanghal AC (1980) Strength characteristics of buried jointed pipelines. American Society of Civil Engineers and Engineering Foundation, Arizona State University, Final Report #R80027, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  37. Trautmann CH, O’Rourke TD (1983) Behavior of pipe in dry sand under lateral and uplift loading. Geotechnical Engineering Report 83-7, Cornell University

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bathe KJ (1995) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Ha D, Abdoun TH, O’Rourke MJ, Symans MD, O’Rourke TD, Palmer MC, Stewart HE (2010) Earthquake faulting effects on buried pipelines—case history and centrifuge study. J Earthq Eng 14(5):646–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yun HD, Kyriakides S (1990) On the beam and shell modes of buckling of buried pipelines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 9(4):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Hellenic National Funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” (NSRF 2007–2013)—Research Funding Program “Aristeia II”, project “ENSSTRAM—Novel Design Concepts for Energy Related Steel Structures using Advanced Materials”, grant number 4916.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasileios E. Melissianos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melissianos, V.E., Gantes, C.J. (2017). Numerical Modeling Aspects of Buried Pipeline—Fault Crossing. In: Papadrakakis, M., Plevris, V., Lagaros, N. (eds) Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47798-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47798-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47796-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47798-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics