Skip to main content

Conclusion: The Inviability of Analytic Philosophy, as well as Bad and False Infinities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

With analytic philosophers unable to account for the key elements of human existence: consciousness, language, happiness (laughter), etc.—as well as their ignoring of history/time—the fear of error need not concern us in contemplating such metaphysical concepts as justice and authenticity. Put differently, analytic philosophers’ profound fear of error has not yielded any significant insights into human existence, nor into the existence of humans. Hence, we are free to speculate about the movement of history and how justice as well as authenticity shape that history.

In this volume I have relied on the broadcast iterations of the Star Trek franchise to speculate about values and practices embedded in the absolute and how embracing these values and practices leads to authentic (fulfilling) lives and a stable thriving society. My argument is that the huge, enduring popularity of Star Trek allows us conclude that this franchise conveys actual knowledge of the absolute. In other words, the franchise serves as a guide. This guide tells us to live an authentic/happy life and to achieve a just/sustainable society individuals must be totally committed to social justice, truth, and scientific/intellectual discovery.

On the one hand, Star Trek effectively lays out how to live an authentic life and how to establish a stable, thriving society. The Star Trek text, on the other hand, also warns us against bad infinities and false infinities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Stephen P. Schwartz, A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy: From Russell to Rawls (West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 27–29, 38 (Schwartz 2012).

  2. 2.

    Hans-Johann Glock, What is Analytic Philosophy? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 30–34 (Glock 2008).

  3. 3.

    Nicholas Capaldi, The Enlightenment Project in the Analytic Conversation (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998) (Capaldi 1998).

  4. 4.

    Josh Weisberg, Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: Polity, 2014) (Weisberg 2014).

  5. 5.

    Schwartz, A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy, 192 (Schwartz 2012).

  6. 6.

    Perhaps because a materialist conception of the mind is unrealistic, artistically uninteresting, or both, later, we learn that Data’s android “brother,” Lore, does have emotions (“Datalore” 1988—Next Generation), and Data ultimately comes to have emotions through an “emotion chip” (“Brothers” 1990—Next Generation; Star Trek: Generations 1994). I note in Chapters 2 and 3 that the Data character was always written with emotions—at a minimum desire and loyalty.

  7. 7.

    James McGilvray, Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics (Cambridge: Polity, 1999) (McGilvray 1999); Noam Chomsky, Language and Mind, 3rd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006) (Chomsky 2006).

  8. 8.

    Schwartz, A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy, 182 (Schwartz 2012).

  9. 9.

    Stephen E. Levick, Clone Being: Exploring the Psychological and Social Dimensions (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003) (Levick 2003); Arlene Judith Klotzko, A Clone of Your Own? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006) (Klotzko 2006).

  10. 10.

    Peter Osborne, The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde (New York: Verso, 1995) (Osborne 1995); John McCumber, Time and Philosophy: A History of Continental Thought (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011) (McCumber 2011).

Bibliography

  • Capaldi, Nicholas. The Enlightenment Project in the Analytic Conversation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. Language and Mind (3rd edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, Hans-Johann. What is Analytic Philosophy? New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotzko, Arlene Judith. A Clone of Your Own? New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levick, Stephen E. Clone Being: Exploring the Psychological and Social Dimensions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCumber, John. Time and Philosophy: A History of Continental Thought. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGilvray, James. Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics. Cambridge: Polity, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, Peter. The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde. New York: Verso, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Stephen P. A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy: From Russell to Rawls. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Josh. Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Polity, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gonzalez, G.A. (2017). Conclusion: The Inviability of Analytic Philosophy, as well as Bad and False Infinities. In: The Absolute and Star Trek. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47794-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics