Skip to main content

Gender: Hegemonic Lens for Making Sense of Violence Against Women and Partner Violence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Femicide, Gender and Violence
  • 674 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on gender theory of violence and on the role of feminist movements in constructing knowledge on male VAW. In this gender violence discourse, men and women occupy opposite gendered positions: While men are the active aggressors, women are the passive victims, and VAW is treated as a specific form of violence that stem from patriarchal culture. This chapter also shows how the discourse on VAW has colonised institutions, has been used by political elites to support agendas not necessarily linked to women’s rights and feminist principles, and how VAW is portrayed in the media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The WHO definition of violence, restricted to interpersonal violence, is: ‘the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, or against a group or community that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment or deprivation’ (p. 2).

  2. 2.

    For a methodological critique of surveys on VAW undertaken in other countries I would suggest the following readings: Elisabeth Badinter (2006); Christina Hoff Sommers (1994); McElroy (2016).

  3. 3.

    Cresto-Dina, D. (2009, 3 May). Veronica, addio a Berlusconi. ‘Ho deciso, chiedo il divorzio’. La Repubblica Online. Retrieved from http://www.repubblica.it/2009/04/sezioni/politica/elezioni-2009-2/veronica-divorzio/veronica-divorzio.html (accessed 30 September 2015).

  4. 4.

    De Gregorio, C. (2011, 19 January). Esistono altre donne. L’Unità online. Retrieved from http://www.unita.it/donne/dove-siete-donne-diciamo-ora-basta-firma-br-oltre-37mila-firme-perina-costa-dante-forte-1.266963 (accessed 21 January 2016).

  5. 5.

    The three winning political parties out of the national election of February 2013 were the Centre-left coalition Democratic Party PD led by Pierluigi Bersani, the Centre-Right coalition People of Freedom led by Berlusconi, and the civil movement Cinque Stelle (Five Stars) led by the former comedian Beppe Grillo. Since no political party won an outright majority in the Senate, a grand coalition government was established. Enrico Letta (PD) was appointed Prime Minister and he was replaced 1 year later by Matteo Renzi (PD).

References

  • Amato, G. (2013). Eterofobia (Kindle edition). Verona: Fede & Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2007). Physical aggression as a function of perceived fighting ability among male and female prisoners. Aggressive Behavior, 33(6), 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2003). Personal responsibility under dictatorship. In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (1971). On the meaning and justification of violence. In J. A. Shaffer (Ed.), Violence (pp. 45–99). New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, S., & Goetz, A. M. (1997). Who needs [sex] when you can have [gender]? Conflicting discourses on gender at Beijing. Feminist Review, Summer (56), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badinter, E. (2006). Dead end feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. A., Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2014). Testing predictions from the male control theory of men’s partner violence. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., Larson, D. L., Abrams, M. L., Garcia, C., & Anderson-Block, K. (2012). Types of intimate partner homicides committed by women: Self-defense, proxy/retaliation, and sexual proprietariness. Homicide Studies, 16(4), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp. How the press covers sex crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns, N. (2001). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: Political discourse on women and violence. Gender & Society, 15(2), 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betsos, M. I., De’ Micheli, A., & Caruso, P. (2010). La battered husband syndrome, ovvero: Quando la vittima è lui. Italian Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Thompson, J. B. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufacchi, V. (2005). Two concepts of violence. Political Studies Review, 3(2), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, K. (2009). In an abusive state. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. K., & Follingstad, D. R. (1999). Violence in lesbian and gay relationships: Theory, prevalence, and correlational factors. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(5), 487–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D., & Frazer, E. (1987). The lust to kill: A feminist investigation of sexual murder. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carll, E. K. (2003). News portrayal of violence and women: Implications for public policy. The American Behavioral Scientist, 46(12), 1601–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. (1998). When the ‘extraordinary’ becomes ‘ordinary’. In C. Carter, G. Branston, & S. Allan (Eds.), News, gender, and power (pp. 219–232). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., & Weaver, C. K. (2003). Violence and the media. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A. (1992). Equality and sexual difference. Amnesia in political thought. In G. Bock & S. James (Eds.), Beyond equality and difference. Citizenship, feminist politics, and female subjectivity (pp. 32–47). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A. (1999). Il pensiero femminista. Un approccio teoretico. In F. Restaino & A. Cavarero (Eds.), Le filosofie femministe (pp. 111–166). Torino: Paravia scriptorium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cepernich, C. (2010). Al centro della scena. Campagna elettorale e campagne stampa intorno agli ‘inciampi’ pubblici e privati di Silvio Berlusconi. Comunicazione Politica, (1/2010), 67–80. Retrieved from: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.3270/31640

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheliotis, L. K. (2011). Violence and narcissism: A Frommian perspective on destructiveness under authoritarianism. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 36(4), 337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colaprico, P. (2011). Le cene eleganti. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2009). Violence a micro-sociological theory. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2013). Entering and leaving the tunnel of violence: Micro-sociological dynamics of emotional entrainment in violent interactions. Current Sociology, 61(2), 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas-d’Argemir, D. (2015). News of partner femicides: The shift from private issue to public problem. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consalvo, M. (2003). The monsters next door: Media constructions of boys and masculinity. Feminist Media Studies, 3(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, C. (2009). Sociologia della violenza. Roma: Meltemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, C. (2011). Love as a total institution. An interpretative model of violence against women. Spazio Filosofico, 3, 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, C. (2012). I modelli sociali della violenza contro le donne. Rileggere la violenza nella modernità. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, C. (2014a). Il ‘genio femminile’ e il potere. Osservazioni sui concetti e sulle politiche utilizzati nel contrasto alla violenza contro le donne. In F. Cimagalli (Ed.), Le politiche contro la violenza di genere nel welfare che cambia (pp. 28–40). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, C. (2014b). Il femminicidio in Italia. Dimensioni del fenomeno econfronti internazionali. In F. Cimagalli (Ed.), Le politiche contro la violenza di genere nel welfare che cambia (pp. 157–169). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D., Soares, J., Lindert, J., Hatzidimitriadou, E., Sundin, O.T. et al. (2015). Intimate partner violence: A study in men and women from six European countries. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creazzo, G. (2008). La costruzione sociale della violenza contro le donne in Italia. Studi Della Questione Criminale, 3(2), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, D. G. (2007). From the straight mind to Queer theory. Implications for political movement. A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 13(4), 489–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuklanz, L. M., & Moorti, S. (2009). Local violence, global media: Feminist analyses of gendered representations. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curti, L. (1998). Female stories, female bodies: Narrative, identity, and representation. Washington Square: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danna, D. (2007). Ginocidio. La violenza contro le donne nell’era globale. Milano: Elèuthera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1993). The second sex. London: D. Campbell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFrancisco, V. (1997). Gender, power and practice: Or, putting your money (and your research) where your mouth is. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 37–56). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dei, F. (2011). Pop-politica: Le basi culturali del berlusconismo. Studi Culturali, 8(3), 471–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeseredy, W. S., & Perry, B. (2006). Advancing critical criminology. Latham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2003). The women’s movement, the left, and the state. Continuities and changes in the Italian case. In L. A. Banaszak, K. Beckwith, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Women’s movements facing the reconfigured state (pp. 48–68). United States: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, E. R., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Rethinking violence against women. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, J. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1963). Emile Durkheim: Selections from his work. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1 – the conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(6), 680–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. London: Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1987). Intercourse. London: Martin Secker & Warburg Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols, A. (1984). The taming of the Id: Feminist sexual politics, 1968–1983. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 50–72). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggins, S., & Iedema, R. (1997). Difference without diversity: Semantic orientation and ideology in competing women’s magazines. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 165–196). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisentein, Z. (1997). Feminism of the North and West for export. Transnational capital and the racializing of gender. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (2007). Feminist readings on Abu Ghraib: Introduction. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9(1), 35–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. (1991). Blame analysis: Accounting for the behavior of protected groups. The American Sociologist, 22(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender re-examined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The archaeology of knowledge. Social Science Information, 9(1), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986). The history of sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, K. M. (2001). Theorizing yes: An essay on feminism, law, and desire. Columbia Law Review, 101(1), 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1965). The feminine mystique. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, G. (2009). Gender. Genere. Roma: VivereIn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (2001). Gender setting: New agendas for media monitoring and advocacy. London: Zed Books in association with WACC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M., & Mukherjee, R. (1993). The Penguin Gandhi reader. New Delhi: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R., Baker, K., & Pampel, F. C. (1990). Gender stratification and the gender gap in homicide victimization. Social Problems, 37(4), 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelli, B. R. (2010). L’asimmetria dei generi come problema politico. Uno sguardo sulle attuali teorie femministe. Psicologia Di Comunità, (2/2010), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giomi, E. (2010). Neppure con un fiore? La violenza sulle donne nei media italiani. Il Mulino, (6/2010), 1001–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giomi, E., & Tonello, F. (2013). Moral panic: The issue of women and crime in Italian evening news. Sociologica, (3/2013), 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (2010). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance (2nd ed). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, G. (1999). The whole woman. London, Sydney: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, R. J. (1963). Symbolic crusade. Status politics and the American temperance movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzanti, P. (2010). Mignottocrazia. La sera andavamo a ministre. Roma: Aliberti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaken, J. (2008). Too close for comfort: Psychoanalytic cultural theory and domestic violence politics. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 13(1), 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1981). A world at one with itself. In J. Young & S. Cohen (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media (pp. 147–156). London, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, C. (2010). Politicization of sexual violence: From abolitionism to peacekeeping. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. L. (1971). Violence and nonviolence. In J. A. Shaffer (Ed.), Violence (pp. 103–135). New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston: Sout End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for everybody. Passionate politics. Cambridge: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1985). Speculum of the other woman. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isgro, K. L., Stehle, M., & Weber, B. M. (2013). From sex shacks to mega-brothels: The politics of anti-trafficking and the 2006 soccer world cup. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (2008). La violenza contro le donne. Indagine multiscopo sulle famiglie ‘Sicurezza delle donne’ – anno 2006. Roma: ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2009). The industrial vagina. The political economy of the global sex trade. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (1992). Intimate enemies. Moral panics in contemporary Great Britain. New York: Aldin De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaladelfos, A., & Featherstone, L. (2014). Sexual and gender-based violence: Definitions, contexts, meanings. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(81), 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, K. (2005). Sexual abuse victims and the wholesome family: Feminist, psychological, and state discourses. In E. Bernstein & L. Schaffner (Eds.), Regulating sex. The politics of intimacy and identity (pp. 143–166). New York, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, J. (2013). Introduction to special issue: Theorizing violence. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(3), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2002). ‘Gender symmetry’ in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. (2008). Social change movements and the struggle over meaning-making: A case study of domestic violence narratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(3–4), 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonzi, C. (1974). Sputiamo su Hegel. La donna clitoridea e la donna vaginale. Milano: Rivolta femminile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharia, S., Ndangam, L., & O’Connor, D. (2011). Who makes the news? The global media monitoring project 2010. WACC. Retrieved from: http://whomakesthenews.org/gmmp/gmmp-reports/gmmp-2010-reports (accessed 20 January 2016).

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1989a). Sexuality, pornography, and method: Pleasure under patriarchy. Ethics, 99(2), 314–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1989b). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaraggia, S., & Cherubini, D. (2013). Uomini contro le donne. Le radici della violenza maschile. Torino: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, S. L. (2012). The complexity of victim-questioning attitudes by rape victim advocates: Exploring some gray areas. Violence Against Women, 18(12), 1413–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makombe, K. (2009). Reporting gender based violence. Johannesburg: Inter Press Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. (1998). Women’s studies. In S. Jackson & J. Jones (Eds.), Contemporary feminist theories (pp. 247–257). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, A. (1993). Family feuds: Gender, nationalism and the family. Feminist Review, (44/1993), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, W. (2016). Rape culture hysteria. Vulgus Press (Kindle edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (2005). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1978). Science, technology & society in seventeenth century England. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization of theory. Boston: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M. (1997). News, violence, and women. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraro, L. (2006). L’ordine simbolico della madre. Milano: Editori riuniti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraro, L. (2011). Tre lezioni sulla differenza sessuale e altri scritti. Napoli: Orthotes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgia, M. (2011). Ave Mary. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, M., & Suchland, J. (2006). Gender violence and hegemonic projects. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(4), 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. (1981). On justifying violence. Inquiry, 24(1), 21–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottonelli, V. (2011). La libertà delle donne. Contro il femminismo moralista. Genova: Il Melangolo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitch, T. (2008). Qualche riflessione attorno alla violenza maschile contro le donne. Studi Sulla Questione Criminale, 3(2), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitch, T. (2010). Pervasive prevention: A feminist reading of the rise of the security society. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poidimani, N. (2006). Oltre le monocolture del genere. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J. (1999). On media violence. Tousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, J., & Russell, D. E. H. (1992). Femicide. The politics of woman-killing. New York: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restaino, F. (1999). Il pensiero femminista. Una storia possibile. In F. Restaino & A. Cavarero (Eds.), Le filosofie femministe (pp. 11–110). Torino: Paravia scriptorium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1981). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. London: Onlywomen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1998). Beyond equality and difference: Sexual difference in the work of Adriana Cavarero. Feminist Legal Studies, 6(1), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R. L., Pratt, M. B., & Mohanty, C. T. (2008). Feminism and war: Confronting US imperialism. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristock, J. (2002). No more secrets: Violence in lesbian relationships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, R. (2011). Refusing safety: The feminist struggle to be revolutionary. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 39(1/2), 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romito, P. (2008). A deafening silence: Hidden violence against women and children. Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. (2009). Le identità di genere. Milano: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. (1976). Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, A., & Giuliano, S. (Eds.) (2012). La violenza indicibile: L’aggressività femminile nelle relazioni interpersonali. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A., Basler, C. R., & Dumm, T. L. (2011). Introduction. How does violence perform? In A. Sarat, C. R. Basler, & T. L. Dumm (Eds.), Performances of violence (pp. 1–17). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A. M. (1992a). The disuniting of America. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, M. T., & Demos, V. (2013). Gendered perspectives on conflict and violence. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile Delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. (2010). I corpi del reato. Sessualità e sicurezza nelle società del rischio. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, C. H. (1994). Who stole feminism? How women have betrayed women. New York, Sydney: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2014). Explaining variations in female homicide victimization rates across Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 11(5), 578–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. (1990). Everyday violence: How women and men experience sexual and physical danger. London: Pandora Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J. (Ed.) (2009). Rosenfeld in retrospect. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. W. (2002). Ordinary violence: Everyday assaults against women. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles-Shields, C., & Carroll, R. A. (2014). Same-sex domestic violence: Prevalence, unique aspects, and clinical implications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(6), 636–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, M. (2005). Choosing to refuse to be a victim: ‘Power feminism’ and the intertextuality of victimhood and choice. In M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 167–180). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornham, S. (2007). Women, feminism and media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventimiglia, C. (2006). Problemi di identità maschile. Teoria, 1, 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgilio, M. (2010). Violenza maschile sulle donne e visioni di giustizia. Studi Sulla Questione Criminale, 3, 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volčič, Z., & Erjavec, K. (2013). Commercial and sexualized nationalism on serbian reality TV. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(6), 597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2013). Violence and society: Introduction to an emerging field of sociology. Current Sociology, 61(2), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (2009). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society, 35(3), 447–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willson, P. (2010). Italiane. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards an integrated theory in criminology. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, S. (2010). Gender as catalyst for violence against Roma in contemporary Italy. Patterns of Prejudice, 44(5), 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2014). Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakeley, J., & Meloy, J. R. (2012). Understanding violence: Does psychoanalytic thinking matter? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M., & Runyan, A. S. (2013). Taking feminist violence seriously in feminist international relations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(3), 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanardo, L. (2010). Il corpo delle donne. Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2009). Violence: Six sideways reflections. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandelli, D. (2017). Gender: Hegemonic Lens for Making Sense of Violence Against Women and Partner Violence. In: Femicide, Gender and Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47785-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47785-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47784-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47785-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics