Skip to main content

The Model Do-Di: An Emerging Methodology for the Management of the Relation Between Tourism, Culture and Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2132 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The study traces the scientific literature and the policies connected to the relation between tourism, culture, and sustainable development at international level. Three main trends emerge from this review, and they are focused on mutual impacts, culture as a form of tourism, namely cultural tourism, and the common objective of sustainable development. In order to maximize the benefits that the relation between tourism and culture may bring to the development of destinations and communities, this study highlights a need for a change of paradigm in tourism. The paradigm of integration adopted in this study comes from the application of Mode 2 to tourism by J. Tribe in the 1990s, and reinforced through the integrative frameworks created by Pearce (2012), as an instrument to improve the research of tourism in the future. The purpose of the study is to explain the application from theory to practice of the paradigm of integration. This has been carried out through the adaptation of the dimensions of integration of sustainability, created by Dovers (2005), to a case study where the relation between tourism and culture has a strong significance for the local development, such as in the capitals of culture. Through the identification of domains, which are common to the European Capital of Culture (EcoC), the Matrix Do-Di (Domains-Dimensions) composed by 111 indicators, has been created. The matrix, which has been tested in Valletta as European Capital of Culture 2018, is a tool for the assessment of the process of development that an EcoC, an EcoC candidate, or any city, can bring to its community, starting from the integration between tourism and culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Barretto, M. (2007). Turismo y cultura. Relaciones, contradicciones y expectativas. Colección PASOS edita, n.1 – El Sauzal (Tenerife, Spain): ACA y PASOS, RTPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisier, S. (1999). Desarrollo (local): De qué estamos hablando?. Retrieved April 16, 2015, from http://abacoenred.com/IMG/pdf/boisier.pdf.

  • Brown, F. (1998). Tourism reassessed, blight or blessing?. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. (2005). Clarifying the imperative of integration research for sustainable environmental management. Journal of Research Practice, 1(2), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Capitals of Culture Policy Group. Policy Group 2009–2010. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from: https://ecocpolicygroup.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/ecoc-policy-group_research-framework1.pdf.

  • European Parliament and Council (2014). Decision n. 445/2014/EU. Establishing a union action for the European capitals of culture for the years 2020–2033 and repealing decision no 1622/2006/EC. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014D0445&from=EN.

  • Garcia, B. (2013). European capitals of culture: Success strategies and long-term effects. Study for European union. Retrieved August 11, 2015, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/513985/IPOL-CULT_ET(2013)513985_EN.pdf.

  • Haley, A. J., Snaith, T., & Miller, G. (2005). The social impacts of tourism. A case study of Bath, UK. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3), 647–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impact 08. (2010). Neighbourhood impacts. A longitudinal research study into the impact of the Liverpool European capital of culture on local residents. Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, J. (2001). The Scientification of Tourism. In V. L. Smith & M. Brent (dir.), Hosts and guests revisited: Tourism issues of the 21st century (pp. 29–41). New York: Cognizant Communication Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Neef, M., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M. (1986). Desarrollo a escala humana una opción para el futuro. Montevideo: Editorial Nordan Comunidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Neef, M., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M. (1993). Desarrollo a escala humana: conceptos, aplicaciones y algunas reflexiones. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial, s.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for the Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). The impact of culture on tourism. Retrieved January 11, 2011, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/6/42040227.pdf.

  • Ortuño Martínez, M. (1998). Patrimonio cultural y turismo. Retrieved January 22, 2011, from http://www.ual.es/Congresos/Turismo-Mediterraneo/panel2-3.pdf.

  • Panosso Netto, A. (2007). Filosofia del turismo. Una propuesta epistemológica. Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo, 16(4), 389–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (2012). Frameworks for tourism research. CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereiro Pérez, X. (2009). Turismo cultural. Una visão antropológica. Colección Pasos Edita n.2. ACA y PASOS, RTPC. 2009. Tenerife, Spain: El Sauzal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pi-Sunyer, O. (1989). Changing perceptions in a Catalan resort town. In V. Smith (Org.) Host and guests. The anthropology of tourism (pp. 187–199). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (1996). Cultural tourism in Europe. Cabi International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (1998). Cultural tourism in Europe: Recent developments. Actas del Congreso Europeo sobre itinerarios culturales y rutas temáticas. Logroño, Spain 20–22 November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santana Talavera, A. (1997). Antropología y turismo. Nuevas hordas, viejas culturas? SA Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (2001). Power and ethnicity in paradise Boracay, Philippines. In V. Smith, & M. Brent, (Eds.) Hosts and guests. Tourism issues of the 21st century (pp. 141–152). California: Cognizant Communication Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valletta 2018. (2011). Valletta candidate city European capital of culture 2018. Retrieved November 18, 2014, from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8up9is7badhhqmi/AAClCQZ0JGF5BdP4DEjz5bJGa/Bid%20Book%202011.pdf?dl=0.

  • Valletta 2018. (2012). Imagine 2018. V.18 Valletta candidate city European capital of culture 2018. Retrieved January 15, 2015 from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8up9is7badhhqmi/AAA-4UOVeVBjP88fMlExD2FPa/V18-BB2-final%20maltese%2Bcaptions.pdf?dl=0.

  • Van Broek, A. M. (2001). Pamukkale: Turkish homestay tourism. In V. Smith, & M. Brent (Eds.), Hosts and guests. Revisited: Tourism issues of the 21st century (pp. 161–174). California: Cognizant Communication Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarkia, C. (1996). Philoxenia. Receiving tourists but not guests on a Greek Island. In: Coping with tourists. European Reactions to Mass Tourism. Boissevain, J. Berghahn Books, Oxford, pp. 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giusy Cardia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cardia, G., Pulido Fernández, J.I. (2017). The Model Do-Di: An Emerging Methodology for the Management of the Relation Between Tourism, Culture and Development. In: Katsoni, V., Upadhya, A., Stratigea, A. (eds) Tourism, Culture and Heritage in a Smart Economy . Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47732-9_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics