Skip to main content

The Concept of the Innovative Tourism Enterprises Assessment Capability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Tourism, Culture and Heritage in a Smart Economy

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 2147 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to present the concept of the innovative capability evaluation system of the company and to present the results of empirical research, that is, to determine the extent of the innovation capability of the two tourist enterprises. The basic problem which is presented in the chapter is the recognition of the innovative capacity gap, which is the difference between the desired innovation potential and the one that the company owns. A set of the innovative capability key determinants that constitute the basis for assessing this ability has been extracted during the two-phase own research. In the case discussed in the chapter, 13 evaluation criteria with appropriate weights and scales of assessment were adopted and then the evaluation model of the innovative capability of the tourist enterprise was presented. In the empirical part of the chapter we have verified the concept of innovative capability. We have also presented the results of empirical research in the innovative capability of hotels assessment Card. In conclusion, a sequence of actions aimed at leveling the gaps of innovation potential as well as stimulating the process of innovation in the hotels researched was added.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albaladejo, M., & Romijn, H. A. (2000). Determinants of innovation capability in small UK firms: An empirical analysis (ECIS working paper series, No. 200013). Eindhoven: Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, R. J. I., & Bromiley, P. (2009). Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone? Strategic Organization, 7(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruk, J. (2013). Innowacje jako czynnik sukcesu organizacji. „Zarządzanie i Finanse”. nr 4. część I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, P., & Ryan, M. (2010). Measuring firm level innovation. Review of the Literature & Survey Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, B. K., Young, L., Tu, C., & Chongyi, F. (2014). Co-innovation in networks of resources—A case study in the Chinese exhibition industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichs, E., Engel, K., & Wangner, K. (2006). Assessment of Current Practices in Innovation Management Consulting Approaches and Self-Assessment Tools in Europe to Define the Requirements for Future “Best Practice”. IMP3rove—Europe Innova Paper. No 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europejskie innowacje społeczne. (2014). Retrieved January 2, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/polices/innovation/policysocial-innovation/competition/index_pl.htm.

  • Galvez, D., Camargo, M., Rodriguez, J., & Morell, L. (2013). PII—Potential innovation index: A tool to benchmark innovation capabilities in international context. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloet, M., & Samson, D. (2013). Knowledge management to support systematic innovation capability. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/hicss_46/bp46/ks4.pdf.

  • Hansen, M., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2007). The innovation value chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiliami, M. F., Ramayah, T., Mustapha, Y., & Pavanchlik, S. (2010). Product and process innovativeness: Evidence from Malaysian SME’s. European Journal of Social Science, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. L., Sainio, M., & Jauhiainen, T. (2008). Appropiability regime for radical and incremental innovations (Vol. 38, No. 3). R&D Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEAD. (2007). Global innovation index: More on methodology. INSEAD Global Innovation Index 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozioł, L., & Karaś, A. (2013). Innovativeness in tourist companies: Assessment attempt. In Malopolska School of Economics (Ed.), The Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnow. Research papers collection. Work on management in Tarnow (Vol. 23, Issue 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., & Samson, P. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, A., Wrake, M., Hagberg, T., & Roth, S. (2014). Why the EU ETS needs reforming: An empirical analysis of the impact on company investments. In Climate policy (Vol. 14, No. 5). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łunarski, J., & Stadnicka, D. (2007). Metoda samooceny potencjału innowacyjnego organizacji. In Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu (Vol. 4). Warsaw: SIGMA-NOT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood, T., & Finegan A. D. (2009). A knowledge management approach to innovation and learning in the construction industry. In International journal of managing projects in business (Vol. 2, No. 2). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (2008). Innovation metrics: The innovation process and how to measure it. An InnovationLabs White Paper, InnovationLab LLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmentier, G., & Mangematin, V. (2014). Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries. In Technological forecasting and social change (Vol. 83). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropre, S., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Elsevier, 37(6–7), 961–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Shipp, S., Lal, B., & Stone, A. (2009). Frameworks for measuring innovation: Initial approaches. Washington: Athena Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waiyawuththanapoom, N., Isckia, T., & Danesghar, F. (2013). Ready for open innovation or not? An open innovation readiness assessment model (OIRAM) (pp. 465–472). Washington: ICICKM Proceeding.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Karaś .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koziol, L., Wojtowicz, A., Karaś, A. (2017). The Concept of the Innovative Tourism Enterprises Assessment Capability. In: Katsoni, V., Upadhya, A., Stratigea, A. (eds) Tourism, Culture and Heritage in a Smart Economy . Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47732-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics