Skip to main content

Enamel is the Hardest Biomaterial Known

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

Abstract

Enamel is the protective cover of the teeth of vertebrates. The mature enamel is the most durable material in the organism and withstands high forces and the wear of chewing and cutting for a full life span. In its mature state it is composed of hydroxyapatite in a rod-like microcrystalline mineral phase. During its formation ions and several proteins are secreted by a secretion apparatus of amelobasts, which are oriented in a cell layer by a basement membrane. The basement membrane and some of the proteins (amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin and others) including two proteases (matrix metalloproteinase MMP20, kallikrein-4 related peptidase-4) are essential for correct enamel formation.The enamel rods are formed by a vectorial secretion and exactly one rod is formed by an ameloblast. The proteins are largely removed by the proteases during maturation and the organic phase is replaced by mineral. Enamel rods are interwoven in a basket-like way giving rise to steel-like mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moradian-Oldak J (2012) Protein-mediated enamel mineralization. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 17:1996–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett JD (2013) Dental enamel development: proteinases and their enamel matrix substrates. ISRN Dent 2013:684607

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruckner-Tuderman L, Has C (2014) Disorders of the cutaneous basement membrane zone–the paradigm of epidermolysis bullosa. Matrix Biol 33:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan MC, Lee K, Miyashita Y, Carter WG (1999) Targeted disruption of the LAMA3 gene in mice reveals abnormalities in survival and late stage differentiation of epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 145(6):1309–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Franklin DL, Severs NJ, Katchburian E (1991) Development of the distal end and Tomes’ processes of ameloblasts observed by freeze-fracture and ultrathin section electron microscopy. J Anat 174:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hanaizumi Y, Shimokobe H, Wakita M (1994) The three-dimensional structure of Tomes’ processes and their relationship to arrangement of enamel prism in dog teeth. Arch Histol Cytol 57(2):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanaizumi Y, Yokota R, Domon T, Wakita M, Kozawa Y (2010) The initial process of enamel prism arrangement and its relation to the Hunter-Schreger bands in dog teeth. Arch Histol Cytol 73(1):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmer JP, Richardson AS, Hu YY, Smith CE, Ching-Chun Hu, Ching-Chun Hu J (2012) A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization … and why we need one. Int J Oral Sci 4(3):129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Snead ML (2015) Biomineralization of a self-assembled, soft-matrix precursor: enamel. JOM (1989) 67(4):788–795

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fincham AG, Moradian-Oldak J, Simmer JP, Sarte P, Lau EC, Diekwisch T, Slavkin HC (1994) Self-assembly of a recombinant amelogenin protein generates supramolecular structures. J Struct Biol 112(2):103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu JC, Hu Y, Lu Y, Smith CE, Lertlam R, Wright JT, Simmer JP (2014) Enamelin is critical for ameloblast integrity and enamel ultrastructure formation. PLoS ONE 9(3):e89303. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gopinathan G, Jin T, Liu M, Li S, Atsawasuwan P, Galang MT, Diekwisch TG (2014) The expanded amelogenin polyproline region preferentially binds to apatite versus carbonate and promotes apatite crystal elongation. Front Physiol 5:430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu D, Paine ML, Luo W, Bringas P Jr, Snead ML (2006) Altering biomineralization by protein design. J Biol Chem 281(30):21173–21182

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kawasaki K (2009) The SCPP gene repertoire in bony vertebrates and graded differences in mineralized tissues. Dev Genes Evol 219(3):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu JX, Burton SD, Xu YS, Buchko GW, Shaw WJ (2014) The flexible structure of the K24S28 region of leucine-rich amelogenin protein (LRAP) bound to apatites as a function of surface type, calcium, mutation, and ionic strength. Front Physiol 5:254

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw WJ (2015) Solid-state NMR studies of proteins immobilized on inorganic surfaces. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 70:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith CE (1998) Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9(2):128–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Engel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engel, J. (2017). Enamel is the Hardest Biomaterial Known. In: A Critical Survey of Biomineralization. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47711-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47711-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47710-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47711-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics