Skip to main content

Releases and Osteotomies Used for the Correction of Adult Lumbar Scoliosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1351 Accesses

Abstract

The surgical release for adult spinal deformity requires both bony and soft tissue removal for realignment surgery. These surgical techniques can be powerful tools to allow the surgeon to safely and effectively correct spinal deformity. However, as the complexity of the surgical release increases, so do the complications, and careful surgical planning is critical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(18):2024–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(6):682–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):721–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(20):2329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HJ, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, et al. RhBMP-2 is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity: 4- to 14-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(14):1209–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maeda T, Buchowski JM, Kim YJ, et al. Long adult spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum using rhBMP-2 versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(12):1077–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, et al. Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures: prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(19):1663–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shufflebarger HL, Clark CE. Effect of wide posterior release on correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998;7(2):117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE. The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(3):269–76; discussion 76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(17):1595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crandall DG, Revella J. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(20):2126–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lykissas MG, Aichmair A, Hughes AP, et al. Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors. Spine J. 2014;14(5):749–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, et al. Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(3):289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimm BD, Leas DP, Poletti SC, Johnson 2nd DR. Postoperative complications within the first year after extreme lateral interbody fusion: experience of the first 108 patients. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(3):E151–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehren C, Mayer HM, Zandanell C, et al. The oblique anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine provides access to the lumbar spine with few early complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(9):2020–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, et al. Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(4):862–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, et al. Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):994–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta MC. Reducing rod breakage and nonunion in pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the importance of rod number and configuration in 264 patients with two-year follow-up. Scoliosis Research Society Annual Meeting; September 30–October 3; Minneapolis, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta S, Eksi MS D-JBACDVGM. Paper #182: four rods prevent rod breakage and pseudarthrosis in pedicle subtraction osteotomies. 21st international meeting on advanced spine techniques, July 19, Valencia, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta MC, Ferrero E, Mundis G, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the revision versus primary adult spinal deformity patient: is there a difference in correction and complications? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(22):E1169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel R, Khan SN, McMains MC, Gupta M. Technique for lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity in revision. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(6):261–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munish C. Gupta MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, M.C., Gupta, S. (2017). Releases and Osteotomies Used for the Correction of Adult Lumbar Scoliosis. In: Klineberg, E. (eds) Adult Lumbar Scoliosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47709-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47709-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47707-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47709-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics