Advertisement

The Nature of the Species-specificity of Human Language

  • Antonino Pennisi
  • Alessandra Falzone
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 12)

Abstract

Beginning from the agreement between CBM and DBM on the species-specificity of human language, in this chapter the authors will discuss the strictly technical interpretation with which the evolutionary approach defines this notion and which has been much abused particularly in philosophical speculation. In particular, they connect with the notion of the origin of Lorenzian ethology to grasp the “coercive” content of the very idea of species-specificity. For Darwinian biolinguistics, the species-specificity of language is first and foremost the recognition of its biological constraints and the cognitive limitations. It follows a naturalistic linguistic philosophy emphasizing the special formatting of human linguistic cognition, as conditioned by a specific bodily language technology, and tecnomorphic characteristics of thought arising from it.

Keywords

Human Language Linguistic Knowledge Language Technology Phenomenal World Physiological Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291, 1748–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology. What is and how it evolves. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. Auroux, S. (1999). Scrittura e grammatizzazione. Introduzione alla storia delle scienze del linguaggio. Palermo: Novecento.Google Scholar
  4. Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace and World, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York/Oxford: Columbia University Press/Basil Blackwell Publisher.Google Scholar
  7. Corning, P. (2003). Nature’s magic. Synergy in evolution and the fate of humankind. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation. A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hauser, M. D. (2009). The possibility of impossible cultures. Nature Horizons, 460(9), 190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kratzenstein, C. T. (1781). Tentamen resolvendi problema ab Academia scientiarum imperiali pe- tropolitana ad annum 1780 publice propositum: 1. Qualis sit natura et character sonorum vocalium a, e, i, o, u tam insigniter se diversorum; 2. Annon construi queant. Instrumenta ordine tuborum organicorum, sub-termino vocis humanae noto, similia, quae litterarum vocalium a, e, i, o, u sonos exprimant. In publico Academiae conventu, die XIX septembris 1780, praemio coronatum, Acta Academia Petropolitana, Petersburg, 1-50.Google Scholar
  12. Lenneberg, E. H. (1971). Of language knowledge, apes, and brains. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lieberman, P. (1975). On the origins of language. An introduction to the evolution of human speech. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Lo Piparo, F. (2003). Aristotele e il linguaggio. Cosa fa di una lingua una lingua. Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
  15. Lorenz, K. (1959). Psychologie und Stammesgeschichte. In G. Heberer (Ed.), Evolution der Organismen (pp. 131–172). Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
  16. Lorenz, K. (1973b). Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  17. Lorenz, K. (1978). Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung. Grundlagen der Ethologie. Wien: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lorenz, K. (1983). Der Abbau des Menschlichen. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  19. Pennisi, A. (2006). Patologie e psicopatologie del linguaggio. In A. Pennisi & P. Perconti (Eds.), Le scienze cognitive del linguaggio (pp. 175–250). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  20. Pennisi, A. (2014b). La tecnologia del linguaggio tra passato e presente. Blitiry, II(2), 195–220.Google Scholar
  21. Read, D. (2007). Artefact classification: A conceptual and methodological approach. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  22. Read, D., & Van Der Leeuw, S. (2008). Biology is only part of the story…. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 1959–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Renfrew, C., Frith, C. D., & Malafouris, L. (2009). The sapient mind: Archaeology meets neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Riskin, J. (2003). Eighteenth-century wetware. Representations, 83(1), 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rucker, R. B. (1988). Wetware. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  26. Spelke, E. (2009). Forum. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), Why we cooperate (pp. 149–172). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Spelke, E., & Hauser, H. (2004). Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: A case study of mathematics. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (Vol. III). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stout, D., Toth, N., Schick, K., & Chaminade, T. (2009). Neural correlates of early stoneage toolmaking: Technology, language and cognition in human evolutio. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 363, 1939–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Von Kempelen, W. (1778) Mechanismus der menschlichen sprache: nebst der Beschreibung seiner sprechenden Maschine, Wien: Degen (1791).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonino Pennisi
    • 1
  • Alessandra Falzone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations