Skip to main content

The Update of the Biolinguistic Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Darwinian Biolinguistics

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 12))

  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the reconstruction of the criticisms and internal reviews of Chomskyan biolinguistics. In particular, it deals with Balari and Lorenzo’s positions, who support the often extreme acceptance of the Evo-Devo, and those of Cedric Boeckx. The latter, especially, deeply reflects the need for the pre-existence of the lexicon so that one is able to apply the computational mechanisms provided by the minimalist position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, J. (2006). The Articulate Mammal. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R., & Lightfoot, D. W. (2002). The language organ. Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2010). ÂżPara quĂ© sirve un ballestrinque? Reflexiones sobre el funcionamiento de artefactos y organismos en un mundo sin funciones. Teorema, XXIX(3), 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2013). Computational phenotypes. Towards an evolutionary developmental biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2015). The end of development. Biological Theory, 10(1), 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent, I. (2013). The phonological mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, C. (2011). Biolinguistics: A brief guide for the perplexed. Language Science, 5, 449–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, C., & Grohmann, K. K. (2007). The biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics, 1, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, D. (2013). The nature and origin of language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. (1965). La connaissance de la vie. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A. M., & Boeckx, C. (2011). The biolinguistic enterprise. New perspective on the evolution and nature on the human language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T. (2005). The evolution of language: A comparative review. Biology and Philosophy, XX(2–3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T. (2008). Glossogeny and phylogeny: Cultural evolution meets genetic evolution. Trends in genetics, 24(8), 373–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1961). Histoire de la folie Ă  l’âge classique: Folie et dĂ©raison. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • GivĂłn, T. (2002). Bio-linguistics. The Santa Barbara lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D., & Bever, T. (2008). A biolinguistic agenda. Science, 322(5904), 1057–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R. (2014). Origins of language: A slim guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (2007). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain research, 1146, 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R., & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (2008). Kluge. Boston: Houghton Miffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of art, science and religion. London/New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallerman, M. (2014). No syntax saltation in language evolution. Language Sciences, 46, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pennisi, A., Falzone, A. (2016). The Update of the Biolinguistic Agenda . In: Darwinian Biolinguistics . Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47688-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47688-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47686-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47688-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics