Abstract
In this paper, I recount my experiences in conducting a comprehensive five step evaluative exercise which was aimed at collecting feedback from various sources in order to help inform future teaching interventions for a first year computer literacy course in a South African university. The exercise centres on a focus group study that was conducted with a number of students who had completed the course between 2013 and 2015 and solicited their feedback on the basis of their own personal experiences. The five step process in which this study was executed included collecting feedback from a critical peer in addition to synthesising the author’s own insights. The study was prompted by the author’s realization that feedback is most often mistaken for evaluation, whereas evaluation is better conceived as the triangulation of various sources of information. The use of a focus group study instead of the common feedback method of the questionnaire also helped engage the students more robustly and was better suited as a tool to collect a richer set of qualitative data. The study yielded useful insights which have implications for teaching and learning activities, assessment of student learning and the curriculum at large.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biggs, J.: What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 18(1), 57–75 (1999)
Centre for Higher Education Research Teaching and Learning: Evaluation of teaching and courses. Rhodes University, Grahamstown (2013)
Kember, D., Leung, D., Kwan, K.: Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 27(5), 411–425 (2002)
McKeachie, W., Kaplan, M.: Persistent problems in evaluating college teaching (2007). http://cedar.olemiss.edu/depts/vc_academic_affairs/problems.html
Morley, D.: Claims about the reliability of student evaluations of instruction: the ecological fallacy rides again. Stud. Educ. Eval. 38, 15–20 (2012)
Murray, H.: Does evaluation of teaching lead to improvement of teaching? Int. J. Acad. Dev. 2(1), 20–41 (1997)
Pratt, D.: Good teaching: one size fits all?. In: Ross-Gordon, J. (ed.) An Update on Teaching Theory, pp. 5–16. Jossey-Bass, San Franciso (2002)
Saroyan, A., Amundsen, C.: Evaluating university teaching: time to take stock. Assess. Eval. Highjer Educ. 26(4), 341–353 (2010)
Trigwell, K.: Judging university teaching. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 6(1), 65–73 (2001)
Watson, S.: Closing the feedback loop: ensuring effective action from student feedback. Tert. Educ. Manag. 9(2), 145–157 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsietsi, M. (2016). A Case Study in the Use of the Five Step Peer Evaluation Strategy to Improve a First Year Computer Literacy Course: An Exercise in Reflective Evaluation Practice. In: Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47680-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47679-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47680-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)