Skip to main content

Comparative Study: Motor Area EEG and All-Channels EEG

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EEG Signal Analysis and Classification

Part of the book series: Health Information Science ((HIS))

Abstract

This chapter reports a comparative study between motor area EEG and all-channels EEG for the three algorithms which are proposed in Chap. 10. In this chapter, we intend to investigate two particular issues: first, which of the three algorithms is the best for MI signal classification, and second, which EEG data, ‘motor area data or all-channels data’ is better for providing more information about MI signal classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdulkadir, S. (2009) ‘Multiclass least-square support vector machines for analog modulation classification’, Expert System with Applications, Vol. 36, pp. 6681–6685.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCI competition III, 2005, http://www.bbci.de/competition/iii.

  • Blankertz, B., Muller, K.R., Krusienki, D. J., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Schlogl, A., Pfurtscheller, S., Millan, J. De. R., Shrooder, M. and Birbamer, N. (2006) ‘The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems’, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caesarendra, W., Widodo, A. and Yang, B.S. (2010) ‘Application of relevance vector machine and logistic regression for machine degradation assessment’, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 24, pp. 1161–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandaka, S., Chatterjee, A. and Munshi, S. (2009) ‘Cross-correlation aided support vector machine classifier for classification of EEG signals’, Expert System with Applications, Vol. 36, pp. 1329–1336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., Chatterjee, A. and Munshi, S. (2010) ‘Correlation techniques and least square support vector machine combine for frequency domain based ECG beat classification’, Medical Engineering and Physics, Vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1161–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. (1989) Applied logistic regression, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostenveld, R. & Praamstra, P. (2001) ‘The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERD measurements’, Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander T H, Leistner S, Wabnitz H, Mackert B M, Macdonald R and Trahms L (2010) ‘Cross-correlation of motor activity signals from dc-magnetoencephalography, near-infrared spectroscopy and electromyography’, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, doi:10.1155/2010/78527.

  • Siuly, Li, Y. and Wen, P. (2009) ‘Classification of EEG signals using Sampling Techniques and Least Square Support Vector Machines’, RSKT 2009, LNCS 5589, pp. 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly, Li, Y. and Wen, P. (2010) ‘Analysis and classification of EEG signals using a hybrid clustering technique’, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME2010), pp. 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly, Li, Y. and Wen, P. (2011a) ‘Clustering technique-based least square support vector machine for EEG signal classification’, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 104, Issue 3, pp. 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly, Li, Y. and Wen, P. (2011b) ‘EEG signal classification based on simple random sampling technique with least square support vector machines’, International journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 390–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly and Y. Li, (2012) ‘Improving the separability of motor imagery EEG signals using a cross correlation-based least square support vector machine for brain computer interface’, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 526–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly, Y. Li, and P. Wen, (2013) ‘Identification of Motor Imagery Tasks through CC-LR Algorithm in Brain Computer Interface’, International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications, Vol.9, no. 2, pp. 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly, Y. Li, and P. Wen, (2014) ‘Modified CC-LR algorithm with three diverse feature sets for motor imagery tasks classification in EEG based brain computer interface’, Computer Methods and programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 767–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siuly, Y. Li, and P. Wen, (2014) ‘Comparisons between Motor Area EEG and all-Channels EEG for Two Algorithms in Motor Imagery Task Classification’, Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications (BME), Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1450040 (10 pages).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song L, Epps J, (2007) ‘Classifying EEG for brain-computer interface: learning optimal filters for dynamical features’, Comput Intell and Neurosci, Article ID 57180, 11 pages, doi:10.1155/2007/57180, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subasi, A. and Ercelebi, E. (2005) ‘Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression’, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 78, pp. 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, J.A.K., Gestel, T.V., Brabanter, J.D., Moor, B.D. and Vandewalle, J. (2002) Least Square Support Vector Machine, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, U., Ustun, B., Melssen, W. J. and Buydens, L. M. C. (2004) ‘Multivariate calibration with least-square support vector machines’, Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 76, pp. 3099–3105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. & James, C. J., (2007) ‘Extracting rhythmic brain activity for brain-computer interfacing through constrained independent component analysis’, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Article ID 41468, 9 pages, doi:10.1155/2007/41468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., Gao, X., Hong, B. and Gao, S. (2008) ‘Classifying single-trial EEG during motor imagery by iterative spatio-spectral patterns learning (ISSPL)’, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1733–1743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, L., Ying, Y. and Ying, T. (2009) ‘Classification of tomatoes with different genotypes by visible and short-wave near-infrared spectroscopy with least-square support vector machines and other chemometrics’, Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 94, pp. 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siuly Siuly .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siuly, S., Li, Y., Zhang, Y. (2016). Comparative Study: Motor Area EEG and All-Channels EEG. In: EEG Signal Analysis and Classification. Health Information Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47653-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47653-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47652-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47653-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics