Skip to main content

Life Expectancy, Money, and Growth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Population Aging, Fertility and Social Security

Part of the book series: Population Economics ((POPULATION))

  • 789 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, assuming two assets of money and the claims on physical capital, we examine the effect of an increase in life expectancy on portfolio choices of individuals between these two assets. Money is introduced based on the money-in-the-utility-function approach. With capital externalities as an engine of growth, changes in portfolios of individuals affect the economic growth rate.

This chapter is the revised and expanded version of Yakita (2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The fertility decisions can be endogenized. If parents derive direct utility from the number of their children, the fertility decisions of parents and the effect of declining mortality on them are similar to those in Zhang et al. (2001) and Yakita (2001).

  2. 2.

    This is a two-period-lived-agent version of the utility function of Mino and Shibata (1995). A linkage between life expectancy and spending on health care has been assumed by, for example, Ehrlich and Chuma (1990), Philipson and Becker (1998) and Kalemli-Ozcan (2002).

  3. 3.

    Zhang et al. (2003) and Miyazawa (2006) among others showed, assuming imperfect annuity markets and accidental bequests, that the relation between mortality decline and economic growth can be non-monotonic.

  4. 4.

    For simplicity we assume that an individual does not hold real balances at the end of his second period. Drazen (1981), considering instead the case in which money provides utility in both periods of life, showed that the effect of inflation on capital may depend on the seigniorage transfer policy.

  5. 5.

    We assume here that \( 0<\mu <1 \), for example, on an annual base, although it is not necessarily needed for our result.

  6. 6.

    Since the labor supply per worker is unity, L t is equal to the number of workers.

  7. 7.

    The negative relation between growth and inflation is often documented in cross country data, e.g., Gomme (1993). Although Roubini and Sala-i-Martin (1992) argued that the negative correlation is likely to be spurious as both are caused by policies in financial repression, the negative correlation obtained in our study is conditional on the life expectancy variable.

  8. 8.

    We can see that condition (2.7) is satisfied when condition (2.18) holds.

  9. 9.

    This is a version of the AK model and, therefore, there is no transition and π is a jump variable.

  10. 10.

    Otherwise, if the monetary policy maintains \( 1+\mu =\left(1+ g\right) n \) and hence \( \pi =0 \), increases in the longevity do not affect the relative return rate on money holdings and hence portfolio choices of individuals since the balanced-equilibrium inflation rate is zero.

  11. 11.

    A greater η and/or a higher r tend to make the left-hand side smaller, while higher r is associated with higher ω/a when \( 1>\left( af\hbox{'}/ f\right)\left[1-\left( af"/ f\hbox{'}\right)\right] \). The condition is satisfied when \( f(a)= A{a}^{\alpha} \) (\( 0< A;0<\alpha <1 \)).

  12. 12.

    Although \( \left(\partial \chi /\partial \pi \right)-\left(\partial \varphi /\partial \pi \right)<0 \) (see Appendix 1.1), it should be noted that π may not be monotonic in p when the growth rate of money supply, μ, is constant and relatively high enough for (2.19) to be satisfied. If the inflation rate reaches \( \pi =\eta \left[1/\left(1+ r\right)\right]+\left(1-\eta \right)\left[\mu /\left(\omega / a\right)\right]-1 \), either from above or from below, an increase in life expectancy no longer affects the inflation rate and hence economic growth. The effect of changes in μ is shown in Appendix 1.2.

  13. 13.

    This numerical example is the same as that given in Yakita (2006).

  14. 14.

    A smaller η makes the inflation rate slightly lower and the growth rate slightly higher in each case. We have similar numerical results in the case of a CES production function.

  15. 15.

    We can show that a higher rate of time discount factor leads to lower growth rates and higher inflation rates.

  16. 16.

    For a survey of a different approach and its results, see, for example, Orphanides and Solow (1990). Based on the cash-and-credit goods approach with a cash-in-advance constraint á la Lucas and Stokey (1983) and Batina and Ihori (2000), we can show that an increase in life expectancy leads to higher growth and lower inflation. The cash-in-advance constraint approach will be adopted in Chap. 5.

References

  • Abel, A. B. (1987). Optimal monetary growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 19(3), 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(1), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batina, R., & Ihori, T. (2000). Consumption tax policy and the taxation of capital income. New York, NY, Tokyo: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, V. V., Manuelli, R. E., & Jones, L. E. (1995). The growth effects of monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 19(Fall), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix, D., & Licandro, O. (1999). Life expectancy and endogenous growth. Economics Letters, 65(2), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (1981). Inflation and capital accumulation under a finite horizon. Journal of Monetary Economics, 8(2), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I., & Chuma, H. (1990). A model of the demand for longevity and the value of life extension. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 761–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I., & Lui, F. (1991). Intergenerational trade, longevity, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 1029–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomme, P. (1993). Money and growth revisited: Measuring the costs of inflation in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(1), 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Yanagawa, N. (1993). Asset bubbles and endogenous growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 31(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalemli-Ozcan, S. (2002). Does the mortality decline promote economic growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 7(4), 411–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Ryder, H. E., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Mortality decline, human capital investment, and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., & Stokey, N. (1983). Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), 55–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mino, K., & Shibata, A. (1995). Monetary policy, overlapping generations, and patterns of growth. Economica, 62(246), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K. (2006). Growth and inequality: A demographic explanation. Journal of Population Economics, 19(3), 559–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orphanides, A., & Solow, R. M. (1990). Money, inflation and growth. In B. M. Friedman & F. H. Hahn (Eds.), Handbook of monetary economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, T. J., & Becker, G. S. (1998). Old-age longevity and mortality: Contingent claims. Journal of Political Economy, 106(3), 551–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Financial repression and economic growth. Journal Development Economics, 39(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, F., & Alogoskoufis, G. S. (1994). Money and endogenous growth. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 26(4), 771–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakita, A. (1989). The optimal rate of inflation and taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 38(3), 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakita, A. (2001). Uncertain lifetime, fertility and social security. Journal of Population Economics, 14(4), 635–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakita, A. (2006). Life expectancy, money and growth. Journal of Population Economics, 19(3), 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhang, J., & Lee, R. (2001). Mortality decline and long-run economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 80(3), 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhang, J., & Lee, R. (2003). Rising longevity, education, savings, and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

1.1 1.1 Uniqueness of Balanced-Growth Equilibrium

The left- and right-hand sides of (2.17) are

$$ \varphi \left(\pi \right)\equiv \left(1+\pi \right)\frac{\omega}{a}\left[\left(1+ r\right)\left(1+\pi \right)\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)-\left(1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)\right] $$
(2.23)

and

$$ \chi \left(\pi \right)\equiv \left(1+\mu \right)\left\{\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu}{1+\mu}\right]\left(1+ r\right)\left(1+\pi \right)-1\right\} $$
(2.24)

as depicted in Fig. 2.1. φ(π) is a quadratic function of π and has two intersections with the horizontal axis at \( -1 \) and \( \left\{\left[1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho}\right]/\left[\left(1+ r\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)\right]\right\}-1 \), while χ(π) is a line and intersects the axis of the abscissa at \( {\left\{\left(1+ r\right)\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu}{1+\mu}\right]\right\}}^{-1}-1 \). Since we can easily see that \( \left\{\left[1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho}\right]/\left[\left(1+ r\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)\right]\right\}-1>{\left\{\left(1+ r\right)\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu}{1+\mu}\right]\right\}}^{-1}-1 \) for \( p,\eta \in \left(0,1\right) \), Eq. (2.17) has two real roots, π ℓ and π h , such that \( -1<{\pi}_{\ell } \) \( <{\left\{\left(1+ r\right)\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu}{1+\mu}\right]\right\}}^{-1}-1 \) \( <{\pi}_h \) (see Fig. 2.1). With condition (2.18), however, the smaller root, π ℓ , is not a solution to our model.

Therefore, solving (2.17) for π, we obtain

$$ \pi =\frac{\frac{\omega}{a}\left(1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)+\left(1+\mu \right)\left(1+ r\right)\left\{1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu}{1+\mu}\right\}+{D}^{1/2}}{2\frac{\omega}{a}\left(1+ r\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)}-1 $$
(2.25)

where

$$ \begin{array}{l} D={\left[\frac{\omega}{a}\left(1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)+\left(1+\mu \right)\left(1+ r\right)\left\{1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu}{1+\mu}\right\}\right]}^2\\ {}\; -4\frac{\omega}{a}\left(1+\mu \right)\left(1+ r\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)\end{array} $$
(2.26)

from which it follows that

$$ \left(1+\pi \right)\left(1+r\right)\frac{2\omega }{a}\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)-\left[\frac{\omega }{a}\left(1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)+\left(1+\mu \right)\left(1+r\right)\left\{1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\frac{\mu }{1+\mu}\right\}\right]>0. $$
(2.27)

This implies that \( \frac{\partial \chi}{\partial \pi}-\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial \pi}<0 \). Thus, we have \( sign\left(\frac{d\pi}{d p}\right)= sign\left(\frac{\partial \chi}{\partial p}-\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial p}\right) \).

1.2 1.2 Increase in the Growth Rate of Money Supply

Differentiating χ(π; μ), we have

$$ \frac{\partial \chi}{\partial \mu}=\left(1+ r\right)\left(1+\pi \right)\left\{1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right\}-1 $$

from which it follows that

$$ sign\left(\frac{\partial \chi}{\partial \mu}\right)= sign\left[\pi -\left\{{\left(1+ r\right)}^{-1}{\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right]}^{-1}-1\right\}\right]. $$
(2.28)

Since we can easily see that

$$ \frac{1-\eta \frac{1}{1+\rho }}{\left(1+r\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right)}-1>\frac{1}{\left(1+r\right)\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right]}-1 $$
(2.29)

while taking (2.18) into account, it follows that \( \pi -\left\{{\left(1+ r\right)}^{-1}{\left[1-\left(1-\eta \right)\frac{1}{1+\rho}\right]}^{-1}-1\right\}>0 \). The curve φ(π) does not depend on μ, so the upward shift of χ(π; μ) increases the inflation rate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yakita, A. (2017). Life Expectancy, Money, and Growth. In: Population Aging, Fertility and Social Security. Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47644-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics