Advertisement

Urban Utopias pp 269-279 | Cite as

Epilogue: The Promise of Urbanity—How the City Makes Life Worth Living

  • Robert Pfaller
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

Urbanity is in the first place, as Lewis Mumford nicely puts it, a “promise” (Mumford 1961, 3)—in other words an ideal, a utopia. Not all utopias may be urban, but all urbanity is definitely utopian. Yet the designation that urbanity is utopian, or a promise, does not imply that this utopia has never and nowhere existed or that this promise has not ever been held. Jerusalem, Athens, Rome, Florence, Paris, Vienna, Berlin, London and New York, for example, have at specific heroic moments of their history provided to observers and theorists an image, an instance of what merits the name of urbanity. This raises of course, with increased challenge and urgency, the question of what the constituent features, the necessary conditions of this utopian quality of urbanity may be. Just as with pornography, also with urbanity it may therefore appear easy to tell once one sees it; yet it may turn out equally difficult to name the criteria—that is, the crucial features and the conditions required for this promise becoming reality.

Keywords

Public Space Social Bond Urban Space Life Worth Living Naive Observer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alain [Chartier, Émile-Auguste]. 1973. On Happiness. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  2. Althusser, Louis. 1995. Sur la Reproduction. Paris: P. U. F.Google Scholar
  3. Althusser, Louis. 2008. On Ideology. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Cicero. 1986. De oratore. Über den Redner. Lat. u. deutsch, Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  5. Clastres, Pierre. 1974. La société contre l'état. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  6. Critchley, Peter. 1995. Aristotle and the Public Good. http://www.academia.edu/705315/Aristotle_and_the_Public_Good; http://mmu.academia.edu/PeterCritchley/Papers. Accessed 27 January 2017.
  7. Dirksmeier, Peter. 2009. Urbanität als Habitus. Zur Sozialgeographie städtischen Lebens auf dem Land. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emile, Durkheim. 1988. Über soziale Arbeitsteilung: Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Engels, Friedrich. 1884. The Decline of Feudalism and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie. Accessed 11 September 2016. http://marxists.anu.edu.au/archive/marx/works/1884/decline/index.htm
  10. Federhofer, Marie-Theres. 2001. Urbanitas‘ als Witz und Weltläufigkeit. Zur Resonanz einer rhetorischen Kategorie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Nordlit 9: 3-27. Accessed 08 September 2016, cf. http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/2093/1951
  11. Freud, Sigmund. [1905c]. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud [SE]. London: The Hogarth Press, 8:1–236.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1927d. On Humour. SE 21: 159–166.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, David. 2003. The Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27(4): 939–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Kant, Immanuel. 2006 [1798]. In Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, ed. B. Robert. Louden, Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  16. Kraxberger, Sabine. 2010. Solidaritätskonzepte in der Soziologie. Accessed 09 September 2016. http://momentum-kongress.org/cms/uploads/documents/Beitrag_Kraxberger8_3_2011_5523.pdf
  17. Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1848. Manifesto of the Communist Party. In Marx/Engels Selected Works, Vol. 1, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1969, pp. 98–137. Accessed 9 September 2016. See https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
  18. Mumford, Lewis. 1961. The City in History. In Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  19. Pfaller, Robert. 2011. Wofür es sich zu leben lohnt. Elemente materialistischer Philosophie. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2014. The Pleasure Principle in Culture: Illusions without Owners. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Quintilianus, Marcus Fabius [Quintilian]. 1988. Ausbildung des Redners. Zwölf Reden, hg. u. übers. v. H. Rahn, Bd. 1, 2. Aufl. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.Google Scholar
  22. Ramage, Edwin S. 1973. Urbanitas. In Ancient Sophistication and Refinement. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  23. Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1955. On the Improvement of the Understanding, The Ethics, Correspondence. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  24. Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1912. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. 2. erheblich veränd. u. verm. Aufl ed. Berlin: Curtius.Google Scholar
  25. Žižek, Slavoj. 2016. Migrants, Racists and the Left. Interview, Spike Review, May 2016. Accessed 9 November 2016. http://www.spiked-online.com/spiked-review/article/migrants-racists-and-the-left/18395#.V9XVPiOLQTG.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Pfaller
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Arts and Industrial Design LinzLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations