Skip to main content

Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention in Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research in Clinical Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter reviews assessments that examine pragmatic behaviors and skills in children, as well as intervention procedures that can be used to facilitate change in pragmatic abilities. Several formal and informal assessment tools exist but very few address more than one pragmatic component. A review of intervention procedures reveals that most of the procedures reported in the literature have the capacity to effect change in pragmatic behaviors. However, many of the intervention studies have been conducted with small numbers of participants, and have a low level of evidence or controls. The chapter concludes with suggested future research topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Readin’ and throwing shade are different terms that refer to the same type of speech event. Morgan (2002) defines readin’

    as exposing someone’s interactive deception. It is used to ‘denigrate another to his or her face in an unsubtle and unambiguous manner’ (252) and it is ‘legitimate only when it is accomplished in the presence of others.’ (263)

  2. 2.

    Discrete point assessment refers to those measures which are designed to examine complex skills in individual, decontextualized parts (Francis and Reyhner 2002).

  3. 3.

    A T-unit stands for ‘minimal terminable unit’, and was defined by Hunt (1970) as an independent clause and any of the dependent clauses attached or embedded in it. This measure is used by speech-language pathologists as a measure of syntactic maturity (Scott 2013).

  4. 4.

    C-units are main clauses and any subordinate clauses attached to it, but they can also refer to incomplete sentences (Nippold 2014).

  5. 5.

    RtI is a tiered process used in the United States to prevent academic problems in children, and to provide support when academic problems arise. It involves increasing intensity of services and has the goal of improving academic outcomes for children, including those with communication and/or learning disabilities (Fletcher and Vaughn 2009).

  6. 6.

    A social story describes social cues that occur in any given social situation, such as gaining entry into play groups or taking turns. The social story breaks down the social skill into step-by-step instructions, and is used to support individuals in learning how to internalize and use social skills in real time (Gray 2010). Comic strip conversations are conversations that use drawings to support persons engaged in a conversation (Gray 1994).

References

  • Adams, C. (2002). Practitioner review: The assessment of language pragmatics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(8), 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (2003). Intervention for developmental pragmatic language impairments. Aula Abierta, 82, 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (2005). Social communication intervention for school-age children. Rationale and description. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(3), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., Baxendale, J., Lloyd, J., & Aldredge, C. (2005). Pragmatic language impairment: Case studies of social and pragmatic therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21(3), 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., Cooke, R., Crutchley, A., Hesketh, A., & Reeves, D. (2001). Assessment of comprehension and expression 6–11 (ACE 6–11). London: NFER Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., Gaile, J., Lockton, E., & Freed, J. (2011). TOPICCAL applications: Assessing children’s conversation skills: Turning a research instrument into a clinical profile. Speech and Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agger, B. (2006). Critical social theories (2nd ed.). Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Social (pragmatic) communication disorder. http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Social%20Communication%20Disorder%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2015.

  • Applebee, A. N. (1978). The child’s concept of a story: Ages 2–17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedrosian, J. (1985). An approach to developing conversational competence. In D. N. Ripich & F. M. Spinelli (Eds.), School discourse problems (pp. 231–255). San Diego: College Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. (1998). Development of the Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC): A method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(6), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). The children’s communication checklist-2. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, D., & Cameron, D. (2002). Introduction. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Body, R., Perkins, M., & McDonald, S. (1999). Pragmatics, cognition, and communication in traumatic injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 81–112). East Sussex: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botting, N. (2002). Narrative as a tool for the assessment of linguistic and pragmatic impairments. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botting, N., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1999). Pragmatic language impairment without autism: The children in question. Autism, 3(4), 317–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, D. (2008). Narrative abilities: Advances in research and implications for clinical practice. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., & McKee, L. (1998a). Negotiation skills of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(4), 927–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., & Higbee, L. M. (1998b). Participation in cooperative learning activities by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(5), 1193–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbaugh, D. (2016). Cultural discourse analysis: Pragmatics of social interaction. In A. Capone & J. L. Mey (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (pp. 565–580). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehensive assessment of spoken language (CASL). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. A., Lees, J. A., Murira, G. M., Gona, J., Neville, B. G. R., & Newton, C. R. J. C. (2005). Issues in the development of cross-cultural assessments of speech and language for children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(4), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, T. B. (1998). “Tell me somethin’ good”: A description of narrative structure among African American children. Linguistics and Education, 9(3), 251–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, T. B. (2000). Storytelling in an urban preschool classroom: Reconceptualizing narrative analysis. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 7, 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (2004). Pragmatics and language acquisition. In L. R. Horn & G. L. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 562–577). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, T., Olswang, L., Olson, H. C., & Timler, G. (2003). On becoming socially competent communicators: The challenge for children with fetal alcohol exposure. In L. Abbeduto (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation: Vol 27. Language and communication in mental retardation (pp. 121–150). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, T. E., Timler, G. R., & Olswang, L. B. (2007). Identifying and treating social communication deficits in school-age children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. In K. D. O’Malley (Ed.), ADHD and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (pp. 161–178). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., Smith, C., & Smith, V. (2000). Enhancing student social skills through the use of cooperative learning and conflict resolution strategies. Masters thesis completed at St. Xavier University, Chicago, IL. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED442567.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2016.

  • Cordier, R., Munro, N., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Speyer, R., & Pearce, W. M. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Pragmatics Observational Measure (POM): A new observational measure of pragmatic language for children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(7), 1588–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, J., & Glasgow, C. (1997). The Renfrew bus story. Centreville: The Centreville School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. (2005). Pragmatics: A multidisciplinary perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. (2009). Clinical pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. (2015). Pragmatic and discourse disorders: A workbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curenton, S., & Justice, L. (2004). African American and Caucasian preschoolers’ use of decontextualized language: Literate language features in oral narratives. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damico, J. S. (1985). Clinical discourse analysis: A functional approach to language assessment. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success: Assessment and therapy methodologies for language and learning disabled students (pp. 165–204). San Diego: College-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damico, J. S., Oller, J., & Tetnowski, J. (1999). Investigating the interobserver reliability of a direct observational language assessment technique. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 1(2), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., Shanks, B., & Davies, K. (2004). Improving narrative skills in young children with delayed language development. Educational Review, 56(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJarnette, G., Rivers, K. O., & Hyter, Y. D. (2015). Ways of examining speech acts in young African-American children: Considering inside-out and outside-in approaches. Topics in Language Disorders, 35(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewart, H., & Summers, S. (1988). The pragmatics profile of early communication skills. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewart, H., & Summers, S. (1995). The pragmatics profile of everyday communication skills in children. Revised edition. http://complexneeds.org.uk/modules/Module-2.4-Assessment-monitoring-and-evaluation/All/downloads/m08p080c/the_pragmatics_profile.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2015

  • Dollaghan, C. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: What do we know, and when do we know it? Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(5), 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollaghan, C. A. (2007). The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition (PPVT-4). Minneapolis: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, P. E., Nizeye, B., Stulac, S., & Keshavjee, S. (2006). Structural violence and clinical medicine. PLOS Medicine, 3(10), e449. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, M. (1986). Language intervention with young children. Austin: Pro Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finestack, L. H., & Abbedutto, L. (2010). Expressive language profiles of verbally expressive adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome or fragile X syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(5), 1334–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, N., & Reyhner, J. (2002). Language and literacy teaching for indigenous education: A bilingual approach. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiki, M., Brinton, B., & Clarke, D. (2002). Emotion regulation in children with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1985). The narrativization of experience in the oral style. Journal of Education, 167(11), 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1991). A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(1), 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, S., Brice, A., Capone, N., Fujiki, M., & Timler, G. (2012). Language use in social interactions of school-aged children with language impairments: An evidence-based systematic review of treatment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, J. E., & Miller, L. (2006). Pragmatic language skills inventory. Austin: Pro Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillam, R. B., & Pearson, N. (2004). Test of narrative language. Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillam, R., McFadden, T. U., & van Kleeck, A. (1995). Improving the narrative abilities of children with language disorders: Whole language and language skills approaches. In M. Fey, J. Windsor, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communication intervention for school-age children (pp. 145–182). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girolametto, L. (1997). Development of a parent report measure for profiling the conversational skills of preschool children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6(4), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2010). Lessons from Paulo Freire. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(9), GALE A239857046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H., & Alim, H. S. (2010). “Whatever (neck roll, eye roll, teeth, suck)”: The situated coproduction of social categories and identities through stancetaking and transmodal stylization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, B. K., Fiestas, C. E., Peña, E. D., & Reynolds, C. M. (2011). Creative and stylistic devices employed by children during a storybook narrative task: A cross-cultural study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (1994). Comic strip conversations: Illustrated interactions that teach conversation skills to students with autism and related disorders. Arlington: Future Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (2010). The new social story book. Arlington: Future Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, T. M., Hemphill, L., Camp, L., & Wolf, D. P. (2004). Oral discourse in the preschool years and later literacy skills. First Language, 24(2), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, D. V., & Schneider, P. (2000). Effectiveness of teaching story grammar knowledge to pre-school children with language impairment: An exploratory study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 16(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headland, T. N. (2004). Kenneth Lee Pike 1912–2000: A biographical memoir. Biographical Memoirs, 84, 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, J., & Malone, T. O. (2014). The rules of the game: Properties of a database of expository language samples. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, J., Miller, J. F., Nockerts, A., & Dunaway, C. (2010). Properties of the narrative scoring scheme using narrative retells in young school-age children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneker, S. (2005). Speech and language therapy support for pupils with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties (BESD) – A pilot project. British Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A., Martens, M. A., Fox, R., Rabidoux, P., & Andrige, R. (2013). Pragmatic language assessment in Williams syndrome: A comparison of the Test of Pragmatic Language-2 and the Children’s Communication Checklist-2. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), 198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. M. (2009). The utility of school-age narrative microstructure indices: INMIS and the proportion of restricted utterances. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(4), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. V., Loeb, D. F., Brandel, J., & Gillam, R. (2011). Concurrent and construct validity of oral language measures with school age children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(6), 1597–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, T. J. (2008). The ICF contextual factors related to speech-language pathology. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(1–2), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. (2015). Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D., McGillivray, L., & Schmidek, M. (1997). Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Eau Claire: Thinking Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, K. W. (1970). Recent measures in syntactic development. In M. Lester (Ed.), Readings in applied transformational grammar (pp. 179–192). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, T. L., Bonazinga, L. A., Prelock, P. A., & Taylor, R. S. (2008). Beyond false beliefs: The development and psychometric evaluation of the perceptions of children’s theory of mind measure – Experimental version (POToMM-E). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., & Bonazinga, L. A. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the Theory of Mind Inventory (ToMI): A study of typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(3), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D. (2003). Language intervention for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 29(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D. (2007). Pragmatic language assessment: A pragmatics-as-social practice model. Topics in Language Disorders, 27(2), 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D. (2012). Complex trauma and prenatal alcohol exposure: Clinical implications. American Speech, Language, Hearing Association SIG-16: Perspectives in School Based Issues, 13(2), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D. (2014). A conceptual framework for responsive global engagement in communication sciences and disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D., & Applegate, E. B. (2012). Assessment of pragmatic language and social communication (APLSC, beta research version). Unpublished document, Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D., & Sloane, M. (2013). Model of social (pragmatic) communication. Unpublished document. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D., Rivers, K. O., & DeJarnette, G. (2015). Pragmatic language of African American children and adolescents: A systematic synthesis of the literature. Topics in Language Disorders, 35(1), 8–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D., Rogers-Adkinson, D. L., Self, T. L., Friederich-Simmons, B., & Jantz, J. (2001). Pragmatic language intervention for children with emotional/behavioral disorders. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 23(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyter, Y. D., Van Meter, A., & Applegate, E. B. (2005). Assessment of pragmatic language: Preschool (APL:P). Unpublished document, Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, M. L., Heflin, L. J., & Alberto, P. (2004). The use of social stories to promote independent behaviors in novel events for children with PDD-NOS. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(3), 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L., Bowles, R. P., Kaderavek, J. N., Ukrainetz, T. A., Eisenberg, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2006). The index of narrative macrostruture: A clinical tool for analyzing school-age children’s narrative performances. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, L. (2002). Assessment of social-communicative competence: An interdisciplinary model. In H. Goldstein, L. Kaczmarek, & E. English (Eds.), Promoting social communication: Children with developmental disabilities from birth to adolescence (pp. 55–115). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes, I. (2015). Can intercultural pragmatics bring some new insight into pragmatic theories? In A. Capone & J. L. Mey (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (pp. 43–70). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecan-Aker, J., Flahive, L. K., & Fleming, S. (1997). Teaching storytelling to a group of children with learning disabilities: A look at treatment outcomes. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 24, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2008). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, R. J. (2005). Assessment of social communication skills in preschoolers. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11(3), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Sivyer, S. (2002). Promoting the communication skills of primary school children excluded from school or at risk of exclusion: An intervention study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., Plunkett, C. C., & Stringer, H. (2011). Communication interventions and their impact on behavior in the young child: A systematic review. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 28(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. D., Hutchins, T. L., & Prelock, P. A. (2011). Brief report: Preliminary evaluation of the Theory of Mind Inventory and its relationship to measures of social skills. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(4), 512–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lett, J. (1990). Emics and etics: Notes on the epistemology of anthropology. In T. N. Headland, K. L. Pike, & M. Harris (Eds.), Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate (pp. 127–142). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, N., & Duchan, J. (1988). Assessing children’s language in naturalistic contexts (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinen, L., Loukusa, S., Nieminen, L., Leinonen, E., & Kunnari, S. (2014). The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, referential cohesion and event content in four- to eight-year old Finnish children. First Language, 34(1), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2012). Intercultural communication in contexts (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A., & Rollins, P. R. (1994). Assessment of preschool narrative skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A., Bliss, L., Barra, G., & Bennett, M. (2008). Comparison of personal versus fictional narratives of children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarney, S. B. (1994). Behavioral evaluation scale-2. Columbia: Hawthorne Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Brand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10(3), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (2002). More than a mood or an attitude: Discourse and verbal genres in African American culture. In S. S. Mufwene, J. R. Rickford, G. Bailey, and J. Baugh (Eds.) African-American English: Structure, History and Use (pp. 251–281). London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, M. L., Gillam, R. B., Peña, E. D., & Gulley-Faehnle, A. (2003). Measures of language development in fictional narratives of Latino children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(4), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N. W. (2010). Language and literacy disorders: Infancy through adolescence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N. W., Plante, E., Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Hotz, G. (2016). Test of integrated language and literacy skills. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, P. L., & Hammill, D. D. (1988). Test of language development-intermediate (2nd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, P. L., & Hammill, D. D. (1997). Test of language development-primary (3rd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A. (2014). Language sampling with adolescents: Implications for intervention (2nd ed.). San Diego: Plural Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., & Scott, C. M. (2009). Overview of expository discourse: Development and disorders. In M. A. Nippold & C. M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: Development and disorders (pp. 1–12). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., Hesketh, L., Duthie, J., & Mansfield, T. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1048–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Expository discourse in adolescents with language impairments: Examining syntactic development. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(4), 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbury, C. F. (2014). Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(3), 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, A. E., Bremner, L., Nash, M., Happé, F., & Pettigrew, L. M. (2009). A clinical assessment tool for advanced theory of mind performance in 5 to 12 year olds. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(6), 916–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olswang, L., Coggins, T., & Timler, G. (2001). Outcome measures for school-age children with social communication problems. Topics in Language Disorders, 22(1), 50–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, D. K. (2007). The language use inventory for young children: A parent-report measure of pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(1), 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, D. K. (2009). Language use inventory manual. Waterloo: Knowledge in Development Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasiali, V. (2004). The use of prescriptive therapeutic songs in a home-based environment to promote social skills acquisition by children with autism: Three case studies. Music Therapy Perspectives, 22, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, E. D., Gillam, R. B., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C., & Sabel, T. (2006). Dynamic assessment of school-age children’s narrative ability: An experimental investigation of classification accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(5), 1037–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, E. D., Gutierrez-Clellen, V., Iglesias, A., Goldstein, B., & Bedore, L. (2014). Bilingual English-Spanish assessment. San Rafael: AR-Clinical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, K., Justice, L. M., & Gosse, C. (2007). Narrative assessment protocol. Columbus: Preschool Language and Literacy Lab, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, M. (2007). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Lang, G. (2000). Theory of mind and executive function: Is there a developmental relationship? In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental neuroscience (pp. 150–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, D. B. (2011). A systematic review of narrative-based language intervention with children who have language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(4), 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, D. B., & Spencer, T. (2010). The narrative language measures. Laramie: Language Dynamics Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, D. B., Gillam, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Emerging procedures in narrative assessment: The index of narrative complexity. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, D. B., Gillam, S. L., Spencer, T., & Gillam, R. B. (2010). The effects of literate narrative intervention on children with neurologically based language impairments: An early stage study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 961–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps-Terasaki, D., & Phelps-Gunn, T. (1992). Test of pragmatic language. Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps-Terasaki, D., & Phelps-Gunn, T. (2007). Test of pragmatic language (2nd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, F., Harris, P. L., & de Rosnay, M. (2004). Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: Developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(2), 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C., & Kirchner, D. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(2), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. L., Sell, M. A., & Hadley, P. A. (1990). The social interactive coding system (SICS): On-line, clinically relevant descriptive tool. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21(1), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, K. O., Hyter, Y. D., & DeJarnette, G. (2012). Parsing pragmatics. The ASHA Leader, 17(13), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. E., Martin, G. E., Moskowitz, L., Harris, A. A., Foreman, J. J., & Nelson, L. (2007). Discourse skills of boys with fragile X syndrome in comparison to boys with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(2), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers-Adkinson, D. L., & Hooper, S. R. (2003). The relationship of language and behavior: Introduction to the special issue. Behavioral Disorders, 29(1), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F., & Spekman, N. (1984a). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part I. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F., & Spekman, N. (1984b). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part II. Guidelines, considerations, and specific evaluation procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49(1), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M. (2013). Assessing expository text produced by school-age children and adolescents. In M. A. Nippold & C. M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: Development and disorders (pp. 191–214). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M., & Balthazar, C. H. (2010). The grammar of information: Challenges for older students with language impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1987). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. Revised (CELF-R). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2004). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals – prechool-2 (CELF-Preschool-2). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, H. N., Roeper, T. W., deVilliers, J., & deVilliers, P. A. (2005). Diagnostic evaluation of language variation – norm-referenced. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Goddard, S., & Fluck, M. A. (2004). A scheme to promote social attention and functional language in young children with communication difficulties and autistic spectrum disorder. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(4), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smitherman, G. (2000). Talkin that talk. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanzione, C., & Schick, B. (2014). Environmental language factors in theory of mind development: Evidence from children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing or who have specific language impairment. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. B. (2003). Globalization: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. B. (2010). Globalization: A brief insight. New York: Sterling Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse processing: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 53–120). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, I. (2007). Social-political influence on research practices: Examining language acquisition by African American children. In R. Bayley & C. Lucas (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variations: Theories, methods, and applications (pp. 297–317). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Streissguth, A., & O’Malley, K. D. (2000). Neuropsychiatric implications and long-term consequences of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 5(3), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, H. (2006). Interventions to facilitate narrative and social skills in secondary school students with language and behavior difficulties. In J. Ginsborg & J. Clegg (Eds.), Language and social disadvantage (pp. 199–207). London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, C. (1998). The Strong narrative assessment procedure. Eau Claire: Thinking Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. A., Fey, M. E., Mills, C. E., & Hood, L. S. (2005). Use of narrative-based language intervention with children who have specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(2), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2009). Inequalities of the world: New theoretical frameworks, multiple empirical approaches. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timler, G. R., Olswang, L. B., & Coggins, T. E. (2005). “Do I know what I need to do?”: A social communication intervention for children with complex clinical profiles. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (2012). Communicating across cultures. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Togher, L. (2001). Discourse sampling in the 21st century. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34(1–2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trosborg, A. (2010). Introduction. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics Across Languages and Cultures (pp. 1-42). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A. A., & Sandoval, K. T. (1994). Preschoolers with phonological and language disorders: Treating different linguistic domains. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 25(4), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukrainetz, T. (2006). Teaching narrative structure. In T. Ukrainetz (Ed.), Contextualized language intervention: Scaffolding pre K-12 literacy achievement (pp. 195–246). Eau Claire: Thinking Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations News Centre (2013). 2013 witnessed some of the highest levels of forced displacement ever: UN report. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=46792#.VmRyTOMrKuU. Accessed 4 Feb 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicker, B. (2003). Can social pragmatic skills be tested? The Reporter, 8(3), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmar, F. R. (2013). Strong narrative assessment procedure (SNAP). In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 3010–3014). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Lonergan, J. M. (2010). Expository discourse intervention: Helping school-age children and adolescents with language disorders master the language of the curriculum. In M. A. Nippold & C. M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: Development and disorders (pp. 241–274). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E. (2005). Assessing and facilitating text comprehension problems. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 154–223). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E., & Robinson, L. (2014). A developmental perspective for promoting theory of mind. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 362–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E., Burda, A., & Mehta, Z. (2003). Asking the right questions in the right ways: Strategies for ethnographic interviewing. The ASHA Leader, 8, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, C. E., Culatta, B., Lawrence, B., & Hall-Kenyon, K. (2010). Summarizing expository texts. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerveld, M. F., & Moran, C. A. (2011). Expository language skills of young school age children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(2), 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerveld, M. F., Gillon, G. T., & Miller, J. F. (2004). Spoken language samples of New Zealand children in conversation and narration. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 6(4), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (1993). Communication and symbolic behavior scales – Normed edition. Chicago: Applied Symbolix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (2001). Communication and symbolic behavior scales developmental profile. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A. M., Prizant, B. M., & Hutchinson, T. A. (1998). Communicative, social/affective, and symbolic profiles of young children with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7(2), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. 2nd edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (1989). Test of language competence (Expanded ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. (CELF-5) (5th ed.). San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, T. G. (2005). Ebonics: Background to the current policy debate. In J. D. Ramirez, T. G. Wiley, G. de Klerk, E. Lee, & W. E. Wright (Eds.), Ebonics: The urban education debate (pp. 3–17). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. A. (2010). A best practice guide to assessment and intervention for autism and Asperger syndrome in schools. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. A. (1995). Language development in African American English child speech. Linguistics and Education, 7(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2011). Preschool language scales (5th ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvette D. Hyter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyter, Y.D. (2017). Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention in Children. In: Cummings, L. (eds) Research in Clinical Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47487-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47489-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics