Skip to main content

Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research in Clinical Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 11))

Abstract

Research has shown that cochlear implants have become a popular option for many families who have young children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Findings show that while improvements in spoken language outcomes for children and young people who use cochlear implants are evident, there are large individual differences in performance. Studies that investigate spoken language outcomes for children with hearing loss typically report results based on measures of receptive and/or expressive language or in the subsystems of syntax, semantics, morphology or phonology. There is less research that focuses on the social use of language, that is, the specific pragmatic skills that are challenging for children and young people with hearing loss. Further research is needed to detail the context in which children develop pragmatic competencies in order to inform clinical practice.

This chapter provides an overview of studies of pragmatic development in children who have cochlear implants. It is illustrated throughout with data from our own research. We detail the CONVERSATION model of intervention (adapted from Paatsch and Toe 2016) as a framework for highlighting current research and informing clinical practice. The aim is to demonstrate how research and practice can support pragmatic development in children with hearing loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C., & Bishop, D. V. (1989). Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder: exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24(3), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrosian, J. (1993). Making minds meet: assessment of conversational topic in adults with mild to moderate mental retardation. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(3), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V., & Rosenbloom, L. (1987). Classification of childhood language disorders. In W. Yule & M. Rutter (Eds.), Language development and disorders (pp. 16–41). Oxford: MacKeith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V., Hartley, J., & Weir, F. (1994). Why and when do some language-impaired children seem talkative? A study of initiation in conversations of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., et al. (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(2), 264–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caissie, R., Dawe, A., Donovan, C., Brooks, H., & MacDonald, S. (1998). Conversational performance of adults with a hearing loss. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 31, 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, M. C., Rinaldi, P., Varuzza, C., Giuliani, A., & Burdo, S. (2012). Cochlear implant in the second year of life: lexical and grammatical outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawthon, S. W., Caemmerer, J. M., Dickson, D. M., Ocuto, O. L., Ge, J., & Bond, M. P. (2015). Social skills as a predictor of postsecondary outcomes for individuals who are deaf. Applied Developmental Science, 19(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, T. C., & Dillon, H. (2013). Major findings of the LOCHI study on children at 3 years of age and implications for audiological management. International Journal of Audiology, 52(2), S65–S68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A., Paatsch, L., & Toe, D. (in press). Some trouble with repair: conversations between children with cochlear implants and hearing peers. Discourse Studies, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciocci, S. R., & Baran, J. A. (1998). The use of conversational repair strategies by children who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 143(3), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtin, C. (2000). The impact of sign language on the cognitive development of deaf children: the case of theories of mind. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3), 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dammeyer, J. (2012). A longitudinal study of pragmatic language development in three children with cochlear implants. Deafness and Education International, 14(4), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, L. (2016). Grammatical competence after early cochlear implantation. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies in language: Research, policy and practice (pp. 113–132). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1985). Interaction structure and strategy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk. Response tokens and listener stance. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garton, A. (1992). Social interaction and the development of language and cognition. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A., Nicholas, J., & Sedey, A. (2003). Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 24(1 Suppl), 46S–58S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A., Nicholas, J., Tobey, E., & Davidson, L. (2016). Persistent language delay versus late language emergence in children with early cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(1), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goberis, D., Beams, D., Dalpes, M., Abrisch, A., Baca, R., & Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (2012). The missing link in language development of deaf and hard of hearing children: Pragmatic language development. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33(4), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, A., Coene, M., Rooryck, J., & Govaerts, P. J. (2014). The production of Dutch finite verb morphology: A comparison between hearing-impaired CI children and language impaired children. Lingua, 139, 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, P. C., & Marschark, M. (2008). What we know and what we don’t know about cognition and deaf learners. In M. Marschark & P. C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 439–457). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, M., & Power, D. (2003). Characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in Australian regular schools: Hearing level comparisons. Deafness and Education International, 5(3), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, M., & Power, D. (2006). Some ethical dimensions of cochlear implantation for deaf children and their families. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(1), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibertsson, T., Hansson, K., Asker-Arnason, L., & Sahlen, B. (2009a). Speech recognition, working memory and conversation in children with cochlear implants. Deafness and Education International, 11(3), 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibertsson, T., Hansson, K., Maki-Torkko, E., Willstedt-Svensson, U., & Sahlen, B. (2009b). Deaf teenagers with cochlear implants in conversation with hearing peers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanes, R. C., Nienhuys, T. G., & Rickards, F. W. (2000). The pragmatic skills of profoundly deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(3), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. C., Gutierrez, R., & Ludlow, A. K. (2015). Confronting the language barrier: theory of mind in deaf children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 56, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, E., & Mirus, G. (2003). Examining interactions across language modalities: Deaf children and hearing peers at school. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 34(2), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M., Hall, J., & Horgan, T. (2013). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., Hughes, C., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: A training program. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J., Lieven, E., & Arnold, P. (2001). Oral conversations between hearing-impaired children and their normally hearing peers and teachers. First Language, 21(61), 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J., Lieven, E., & Arnold, P. (2005). The oral referential communication skills of hearing-impaired children. Deafness and Education International, 7(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, P., D’Alessandro, H. D., Guerzoni, L., Cuda, D., Ruoppolo, G., Musacchio, A., et al. (2015). Adequate formal language performance in unilateral cochlear implanted children: Is it indicative of complete recovery in all linguistic domains? Insights from referential communication. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79(4), 598–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTear, M. F., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1992). Pragmatic disabilities in children. London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Meristo, M., Mann, W., Hjelmquist, E., Surian, L., & Siegal, M. (2014). Mental state language and quality of conversational experience in deaf and hearing children. Cognitive Development, 29, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Most, T., & Aviner, C. (2009). Auditory, visual, and auditory–visual perception of emotions by individuals with cochlear implants, hearing aids, and normal hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 55(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Most, T., Shina-August, E., & Meilijson, S. (2010). Pragmatic abilities of children with hearing loss using cochlear implants or hearing aids compared to hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(4), 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F.-E. (1996). Affiliating and disaffiliating with continuers: Prosodic aspects of recipiency. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 131–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, J., & Geers, A. (2007). Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1048–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niparko, J. K., Tobey, E., Thal, D., Eisenberg, L., Wang, N., Quittner, A. L., Fink, N. E., & CDaCI Investigative Team (2010). Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(15), 1498-1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paatsch, L. E., & Toe, D. M. (2013). A comparison of pragmatic abilities of children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their hearing peers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paatsch, L. E., & Toe, D. M. (2014). Comparing the conversational skills of school-aged children with hearing loss with their peers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paatsch, L., & Toe, D. (2016). The fine art of conversation: The pragmatic skills of school-aged children with hearing loss. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies in language: Research, policy and practice (pp. 94–113). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paatsch, L. E., Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., & Bow, C. P. (2006). The effects of speech production and vocabulary training on different components of spoken language performance. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajo, K., & Klippi, A. (2013). Hearing-impaired recipients’ non-vocal action sets as a resource for collaboration in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K., Remmel, E., & Richards, D. (2009). Language, mental state vocabulary, and false belief understanding in children with cochlear implants. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(3), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 36(3), 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(2), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, J., & Tarplee, C. (2000). The management of conversational topic by a ten year old child with pragmatic difficulties. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(5), 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, P., Baruffaldi, F., Burdo, S., & Caselli, M. C. (2013). Linguistic and pragmatic skills in toddlers with cochlear implants. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6), 715–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, J. T., Cosetti, M., Wang, K. H., Immerman, S., & Waltzman, S. B. (2009). Cochlear implantation in the very young child: long-term safety and efficacy. Laryngoscope, 119(11), 2205–2210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandgren, O., Andersson, R., van de Weijer, J., Hansson, K., & Sahlén, B. (2014). Coordination of gaze and speech in communication between children with hearing impairment and normal-hearing peers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 942–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organisation in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schley, S., & Snow, C. (1992). The conversational skills of school aged children. Social Development, 1(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelt, L. (2013). Dealing with misunderstandings: The sensitivity of repair in hearing impaired conversation. In M. Egbert & A. Deppermann (Eds.), Hearing aids communication (pp. 56–66). Mannheim, Germany: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. E. (2016). It seems like only yesterday. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies in language: Research, policy and practice (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surian, L., Tedoldi, M., & Siegal, M. (2010). Sensitivity to conversational maxims in deaf and hearing children. Journal of Child Language, 37(4), 929–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terasaki, A. (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, E. K., Hilsmier, A. S., & Easterbrooks, S. R. (2011). Pragmatic language in deaf and hard of hearing students: Correlation with success in general education. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(5), 526–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, E., Thal, D., Niparko, J. K., Eisenberg, L., Quittner, A. L., Wang, N. Y., & CDaCI Investigative Team (2013). Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in paediatric cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 52(4), 219-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toe, D., & Paatsch, L. E. (2010). The communication skills used by deaf children and their hearing peers in a question and answer game context. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(3), 228–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toe, D. M., & Paatsch, L. E. (2013). The conversational skills of school-aged children with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 14(2), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toe, D., Beattie, R., & Barr, M. (2007). The development of pragmatic skills in children who are severely and profoundly deaf. Deafness and Education International, 9(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toe, D., Rinaldi, P., Caselli, C., Paatsch, L., & Church, A. (2016). The development of pragmatic skills in children and young people who are deaf and hard of hearing. In M. Marschark (Ed.), Diversity in deaf education. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N. (2003). Conversational fluency of children who use cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 24(1S), 82S-89S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Murray, N., & Witt, S. (1996). Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 29, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, L. J. V., Manns, H. J., Iwasaki, S., & Bartlett, M. J. (2014). Misunderstanding and repair in Tactile Auslan. Sign Language Studies, 14(4), 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Wood, H. A., Griffiths, A. J., Howarth, S. P., & Howarth, C. I. (1982). The structure of conversations with 6- to 10-year-old deaf children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 23(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, L., Hickson, L., & Dodd, B. (2009). Review of visual speech perception by hearing and hearing-impaired people: Clinical implications. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(3), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yont, K. M., Hewitt, L. E., & Miccio, A. W. (2002). What did you say? Understanding conversational breakdowns in children with speech and language impairments. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16(4), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Baca, R. L., & Sedey, A. L. (2010). Describing the trajectory of language development in the presence of severe-to-profound hearing loss: A closer look at children with cochlear implants versus hearing aids. Journal of Otology and Neurotology, 31(8), 1268–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, M., Most, T., & Cohen, S. (2013). Understanding of emotions and false beliefs among hearing children versus deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18(2), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Paatsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

Appendix: Transcription Conventions

The transcription conventions used in this chapter follow the original work of Sacks et al. (1974).

.

falling intonation

,

continuing intonation

?

rising intonation

¿

intonation that rises more than a comma but less than a question mark

:

lengthened syllable

↓

sharp fall in pitch

↑

sharp rise in pitch

[ ]

overlapping talk

( )

unintelligible stretch

(0.5)

length of silence in tenths of a second

(.)

a micropause (i.e. less than 0.2 of a second)

> <

increase in tempo

< >

stretched out or slower talk

hh

audible outbreath

.hh

audible inbreath

° °

passage of talk quieter than the surrounding talk

(( ))

description of accompanying behaviour

=

latched utterance, no discernible silence or pause

_

underlining indicates stress or emphasis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paatsch, L., Toe, D., Church, A. (2017). Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation. In: Cummings, L. (eds) Research in Clinical Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47487-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47489-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics