Abstract
It might surprise much people, including economists, if one states that economics has progressively but with a striking certainty turned into a formal science, axiomatized, that has not much to do with the political economy of its origins, that of David Hume or Adam Smith, and the other Scottish thinkers of the end of the eighteenth century. This is what James Buchanan already noted in 1958, when he and G. Warren Nutter decided to launch the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Study of Political Economy.
The original version of this chapter was revised: For detailed information please see erratum. The erratum to this chapter is available at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47471-7_13
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47471-7_13
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
See the journal disclaimer at http://www.springer.com/economics/law+%26+economics/journal/10657.
- 3.
It was precisely Becker’s claim that economists would only need “thin” or “parsimonious” theoretical constructs, by contrast with sociologists, for instance, who need “thick” theories (on the distinction between “thin/parsimonious” and “thick” see Boettke and Coyne 2005; Boettke et al. 2006). And the advantages of an economic approach to crime is that it does not require a complex and detailed theoretical apparatus to explain phenomena.
- 4.
Let us note here that the importance of these European scholars had for Backhaus is another evidence that law and economics is a European field. Besides Coase or Calabresi, or Bentham and Beccaria (see Ramello 2016), there were also all the German scholars to whom Backhaus devoted a lot of work (see Sect. 4 below).
References
Akerlof, G.A. 1970. Uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488–500.
Alesina, A., and E. Spolaore. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alford, W.P. 1995. To Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense. Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Backhaus, J.G. 1997. Christian Wolff on subsidiarity, the division of labor, and social welfare. European Journal of Law and Economics 4: 129–146.
Backhaus, J.G. 1999. Subsidiarity. In The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics,, edited by Backhaus JG, 136–143. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Backhaus, J.G. 2001. Introduction: The intellectual future of the concept of Staatswissenschaften. European Journal of Law and Economics 4: 129–146.
Backhaus, J.G. 2005. Otto von Gierke (1841–1921). In The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, 2nd ed., 519–521. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Backhaus, J.G., and F.H. Stephen. 1994. The Purpose of the European Journal of Law and Economics and the Intentions of Its Editors. European Journal of Law and Economics 1: 5–7.
Backhaus, J.G., and R.E. Wagner. 1987. The cameralists: A public choice perspective. Public Choice 53: 3–20.
Backhaus, J.G., and R.E. Wagner, ed. 2004. The Handbook of Public Finance. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Backhaus, J.G., and R.E. Wagner. 2005. From continental public finance to public choice: Mapping continuity. History of Political Economy 37: 314–332.
Beccaria, C. 1764, 1994. On crimes an Punishments and other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blankart, C.B. 1994. Club governments versus representative governments. Constitutional Political Economy 5: 273–285.
Becker, G. S. 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76(2): 169–217.
Boettke, Peter J., and Christopher J. Coyne. 2005. Methodological individualism, spontaneous order and the research program of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57: 145–158.
Boettke, Peter J., Christopher J. Coyne, John Davis, Francesco Guala, Alain Marciano, Jochen Runde, and Margaret Schabas. 2006. Where Economics and Philosophy Meet: Review of the Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy With Responses from the Authors. Economic Journal 116 (June): F306–F325.
Buchanan, J.M. 1958. The Thomas Jefferson Center for Studies in Political Economy. The University of Virginia News Letter 35(2): 5–8.
Buchanan, J.M. 1959. Positive economics, welfare economics, and political economy. Journal of Law and Economics 2 (October): 124–38.
Buchanan, J.M. 1964. What Should Economists Do? Southern Economic Journal 30: 213–222.
Buchanan, J.M. 2007. Economics from the Outside in: “Better Than Plowing” and Beyond. Texas A&M University Press.
Buchanan, J.M., and W.C. Stubblebine. 1962. Externality. Economica 29(116): 371–84.
Djankov, Simeon., Edward Glaeser., Rafael La Porta., Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes., and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 595–619.
Enke, S. 1955. More on the misuse of mathematics in economics: a rejoinder. Review of Economics and Statistics 37(2): 131–133.
Frey, B., and R. Eichenberger. 1992. Economics and economists: A European perspective. American Economic Review 82: 216–220.
Frey, B., and A. Stutzer. 2010. Happiness and economics. How the economy and institutions affect human wellbeing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grinvald, L.C. 2008. Making Much Ado about Theory: The Chinese Trademark Law. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 15: 53–106.
Josselin, J.M., and A. Marciano. 1997. The paradox of Leviathan: How to develop and contain the future European state. European Journal of Law and Economics 4: 5–21.
Josselin, J.M., and A. Marciano. 1999. Unitary states and peripheral regions: A model of heterogeneous spatial clubs. International Review of Law and Economics 19: 501–511.
Josselin, J.M., and A. Marciano. 2002. The making of the French civil code: An economic interpretation. European Journal of Law and Economics 14: 193–203.
Josselin, J.M., and A. Marciano. 2004a. Federalism and Conflicts over Principalship. Some Insights into the American Constitutional History. Constitutional Political Economy 15:281–304.
Josselin, J.M., and A. Marciano. 2004b. Federalism and subsidiarity, in national and international contexts. In The Handbook of Public Finance, edited by Backhaus JG and Wagner RE, 477–520. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Josselin J.-M., and A. Marciano. 2007. How the court made a federation of the EU. Review of International Organisation 2: 59–75.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes., and A. Shleifer. 2008. The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46: 285–322.
Landes, W.M., and R.A. Posner. 1987. Trademark law: An economic perspective. Journal of Law and Economics 30: 265–309.
Marciano, A. 2013. Why Market Failures Are Not a Problem: James Buchanan on Market Imperfections, Voluntary Cooperation, and Externalities. History of Political Economy 45(2): 223–254.
Marciano, A., and G.B. Ramello. 2014. Consent, Choice and Guido Calabresi’s Heterodox Economic Analysis of Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 77: 97–116.
Margolis, J. 1955. A comment on the pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 37(4): 347–349.
Oates, W. 1999. An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1120–1149.
Ramello, G.B. 2006. What’s in a sign? Trademark Law and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 20: 547–565.
Ramello, G.B. 2016. The past, present and future of comparative law an economics. In Comparative Law and Economics, edited by Eisenberg, T. and G. Ramello. Cheltenham, UK—Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ramello, G.B., and F. Silva. 2006. Appropriating Signs and Meaning: The Elusive Economics of Trademark. Industrial and Corporate Change 15: 937–963.
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387–389.
Samuelson, Paul A. 1955. Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 37: 350–357.
Singleton, J. 2015. Sorting Charles Tiebout. History of Political Economy 47(annual suppl. 1): 199–226.
Tiebout, C. 1956. A Pure Theory of Local Public Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Josselin, JM., Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (2016). The Law, The Economy, The Polity Jürgen Backhaus, A Thinker Outside the Box. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G. (eds) Law and Economics in Europe and the U.S.. The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47471-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47471-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47469-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47471-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)