• Jason Warr


This brief chapter is concerned with a brief exploration of what some of the possible consequences would be for explicitly adopting this form of causal reasoning into criminological theorising. As such, the chapter revisits the four problems identified in  Chap. 2 and explains how the INUS model either avoids or overcomes these problems. This will also involve a brief examination of the problem posed by the Rosenthal Effect (researcher bias) in scientific research and theory construction.


Bias INUS Reasoning Rosenthal Theorising 


  1. Davidson, D. (1994). Actions, Reasons and Causes. In M. Martin and L. C. McIntyre (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 675–686). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Kim, J. (1971). Causes and Events: Mackie on Causation. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(14), 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mackie, J. L. (1974). The Cement of the Universe: A study of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Marini, M. M. and Singer, B. (1988). Causality in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methodology, 18, 347–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Warburton, N. (2000). Thinking from A to Z. (2nd edn.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Warr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations