Advertisement

Paradigm Drift and Criminological Theory

  • Jason Warr
Chapter
  • 363 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the second section of this book: namely, the apparent paradigm shift/drift, in relation to causal explanations, that has occurred, and continues to occur, within the discourse of criminology. Utilising the notion of paradigm shift as introduced by Thomas Kuhn, this chapter examines why criminological theory has changed and developed. As such, various forms of criminological theory (including Life Course, Routine Activity and Developmental Life Cours`e) that have tried to move away from the Humean form of theorising will be explicated. It will be shown how this theory development has led to dissatisfaction with contemporary causal modelling and the search for ever greater explanatory power. It is this facet of theorising that is evidence of a paradigm shift within the field of criminology.

Keywords

Developmental Kuhn Paradigm Routine Scientific Theory 

References

  1. Archer, M. S. (2007). The Ontological Status of Subjectivity: The Missing Link Between Structure and Agency. In C. Lawson, J. Latsis, and N. Martins (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology. Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barak, G. (1998). Integrating Criminologies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, T. J. and Snipes, J. B. (1996). Theoretical Integration in Criminology. In M. Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice (Vol. 20, pp. 301–348). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brush, S. G. (1996). Dynamics of Theory Change in the Social Sciences: Relative Deprivation and Collective Violence. Sage Publications Inc. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(4), 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What Is This Thing Called Science? (4th edn.). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L. E. and Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrington, D. (2005). The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) Theory. In D. P. Farrington (ed.), Integrated Developmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending, Advances in Criminological Theory (Vol. 14, pp. 73–92). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  8. Glueck, S. and Glueck, E. (1950). Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency, published by the Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
  9. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel. New Jersey: Princeton University Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn, T. (1962). The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions. In M. Curd and J. A. Cover (Eds.), 1998 Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (pp. 86–101). New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T. (1977). Objectivity, Value Judgement and Theory Choice. In M. Curd and J. A. Cover (Eds.), 1998 Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (pp. 102–118). New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Laub, J. H. and Sampson, R. J. (1991). The Sutherland-Glueck Debate: On the Sociology of Criminological Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1402–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laub, J. H. and Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Marini, M. M. and Singer, B. (1988). Causality in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methodology, 18, 347–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescent-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Antisocial Behaviour: A Developmental Taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moffitt, T. (2006). A Review of Research on the Taxonomy of Life-Course-Persistent Versus Adolescent-Limited Antisocial Behaviour. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright and K. R. Blevins (eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory – Advances in Criminological Theory (Vol. 15, pp. 277–311). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Sampson, R. J. and Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garland, D. and Sparks, R. (2000). Criminology, Social Theory and the Challenge of our Times. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Warr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations