Advertisement

Humean Causation and the History of Criminology

  • Jason Warr
Chapter
  • 381 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with tracing Humean causation through the history of Criminological theorising in a more systematic way. As such four classic theories from the history of criminological thought shall be given a somewhat brief exposition and the underlying deductive Humean causal framework will be exposed and made explicit. The four examples that have been chosen for exposition are Classical theory, Biological Positivism, Strain theory and Labelling theory. These particular forms of theory have been chosen due to the evident framework of causation that underlies them and how this is largely representative of the type of thinking, employed logics and theory construction that has dominated criminological theorising up until the late twentieth century.

Keywords

Classicism Causation Humean Labelling Positivism Strain 

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1995). Determinism, Indeterminism and Crime: An Empirical Exploration. Criminology, 33(1), 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (2000). Sources of Criminality: Strain and Subcultural Theories. In J. F. Sheley (ed.), Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook (3rd edn., pp. 349–371). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by T Irwin. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Beccaria, C. (1775). An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. Translated by David Young (1986). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, R. H. (2001). An Introduction to Criminological Theory. London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Burton Jr., V. S., Cullen F. T., Evans, D. T., and Dunaway, G. R. (1994). Reconsidering Strain Theory: Operationalisation, Rival Theories and Adult Criminality. The Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(3), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, A. K. 1955. Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: The Free Press a division of Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Cullen, F. T. and Agnew, R. (2006). Criminological Theory Past to Present: Essential Readings. (3rd edn.). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Epicurus. (1993). Principal Doctrines’. In E O’Connor (ed. Translation.), The Essential Epicurus: Letters, Principal Doctrines, Vatican Sayings and Fragments. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, M. (2002). Born to Crime: Cesare Lombroso and the Origins of Biological Criminology. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Harcourt, B. E. (2013). Beccaria’s On Crimes and Punishments: A Mirror on the History of the Foundations of Modern Criminal Law. In M Dubbers (ed.), Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hobbes, T. (1991). Leviathan. In R. Tuck (ed.), Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Lemert, E. M. (1972). Human Deviance, Social Problems and Social Control. (2nd edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Lombroso, C. (1910). The Criminal Man. New York: G. P. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Song, J. J. (2013). Causatives and Causation: A Universal-Typological Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Warr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations