Criminology and the Problem of Causation

  • Jason Warr


The purpose of this chapter is to establish the problem with which the book is concerned. As such the focus of this chapter is to supply answers to the following question: why is a poor understanding of causal mechanisms, and causal explanations, a problem for theoretical criminology? I then set out the four main reasons why a poor understanding of causal argument is indeed a problem for criminology and how these issues can impact on understanding, theory design, data analysis and the age-old problem of distinguishing between causes and correlates.


Cause Correlation Criminological Problems 


  1. Anderson, C. (2008). The End of Theory: The Data Deluge makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired Magazine,
  2. Blackburn, S. (1990). Hume and Thick Connexions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50(Supplement), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cowls, J. and Schroeder, R. (2015). Causation, Correlation and Big Data in Social Science Research. Policy and Internet, 7(4), 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Einstadter, W. J. and Henry, S. (2006). Criminological Theory: An Analysis of it Underlying Assumptions. (2nd edn.). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Gerring, J. (2005). Causation: A Unified Framework for the Social Sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(2), 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harding, S. G. (1976). Introduction. In S G Harding (ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. State University of New York: D Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press New York.Google Scholar
  8. Hitchcock, C. (2007). Three Concepts of Causation. Philosophy Compass, (3), 508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Honderich, T. ed. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Humphries, P. (2014). The Chances of Explanation: Causal Explanation in the Social, Medical and Physical Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marini, M. M. and Singer, B. (1988). Causality in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methodology, 18, 347–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Russell, B. (1913). On the Notion of Cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sowel, T. (1995). The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Steffensmeier, D. and Allan, E. (2000). Looking for Patterns: Gender, Age and Crime. In Joseph F. Sheley (ed.), Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook (2nd edn., pp. 84–127). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  16. Warburton, N. (2000). Thinking from A to Z. (2nd edn.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Wikström, P.-O. H. (2006). Individuals, Settings and Acts of Crime: Situational Mechanisms and the Explanation of Crime’. In P.-O. H. Wikström and R. J. Sampson (eds.), The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development (pp. 61–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson, J. Q. and Kelling, G. L. (1982). The Police and Neighborhood Safety. Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 127(2).
  19. Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York: Start Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
  20. Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Warr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations