Advertisement

Introduction

  • Jason Warr
Chapter
  • 386 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter introduces the book and explains that causation and causal explanations are central to human understanding. The chapter also begins to explain why the problem of causation has been such a thorn in the side of both philosophy and the natural/social sciences. It notes that the field of criminology essentially has three core aims: defining crime, explaining how crime occurs and deciding what to do about crime. It explains the aetiological crisis that has beset criminology and how we are failing our own discipline. It also explains why this is an issue for criminology students and criminological theorists and how they may use the book. It also explains how and why each chapter is set out.

Keywords

Aetiology Causation Criminology Theory 

References

  1. Adams, D. (1987). Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency. London: William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, A. (1998). Twisted Tales: Causal Complexity and Cognitive Scientific Explanation. In F. Keil and R. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Davidson, D. (1994). Actions, Reasons and Causes. In M. Martin and L. C. McIntyre (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 675–686). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ehring, D. (1997). Causation and Persistence: A Theory of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gerring, J. (2005). Causation: A Unified Framework for the Social Sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(2), 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hume, D. (1999). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hume, D. (2003). A Treatise of Human Nature. J. P. Wright, R. Stecker, and G. Fuller (eds.) London: Everyman Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  9. Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and Conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4), 245–264.Google Scholar
  10. Mackie, J. L. (1974). The Cement of the Universe: A study of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marini, M. M. and Singer, B. (1988). Causality in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methodology, 18, 347–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mele, A. R. (2007). Decisions, Intentions, Urges and Free Will: Why Libet has not shown what he says he has. In J. K. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, and H. Silverstein (eds.), Causation and Explanation (pp. 241–264). A Bradford Book, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Song, J. J. (2013). Causatives and Causation: A Universal-Typological Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Weisburd, D. and Piquero, A. R. (2008). How Well Do Criminologists Explain Crime? Statistical Modelling in Published Studies. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 453–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wikström, P.-O. H. (2006). Individuals, Settings and Acts of Crime: Situational Mechanisms and the Explanation of Crime’. In P.-O. H. Wikström and R. J. Sampson (eds.), The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development (pp. 61–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Young, J. (1986). The Failure of Criminology: The Need for Radical Realism. In R. Matthews and J. Young (eds.), Confronting Crime. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Warr
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations