Skip to main content

Responsive Social Agents

Feedback-Sensitive Behavior Generation for Social Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9979))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

How can we generate appropriate behavior for social artificial agents? A common approach is to (1) establish with controlled experiments which action is most appropriate in which setting, and (2) select actions based on this knowledge and an estimate of the setting. This approach faces challenges, as it can be very hard to acquire and reason with all the required knowledge. Estimating the setting is challenging too, as many relevant aspects of the setting (e.g. personality of the interactee) can be unobservable. We formally describe an alternative approach that can handle these challenges; responsiveness. This is the idea that a social agent can utilize the many feedback cues given in social interactions to continuously adapt its behavior to something more appropriate. We theoretically discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches, which allows for more explicitly considering their application in social agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even when limiting ourselves to ‘just’ the relevant setting variables (\(V^{R}\)) this would already be \(\prod _{v{'}\in V^{R}} \left| D_{v{'}}\right| \) combinations (since \(\left| D_{v{'}}\right| \ge 2\) for all meaningful variables, this is at least \(2^{\left| V^{R}\right| }\)).

References

  1. Aiello, J.R.: Human spatial behavior. In: Stokols, D., Altman, I. (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp. 389–504. Wiley, New York (1987). Chap. 12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birnbaum, G.E., Mizrahi, M., Hoffman, G., Reis, H.T., Finkel, E.J., Sass, O.: Machines as a source of consolation: robot responsiveness increases human approach behavior and desire for companionship. In: 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 165–171. IEEE Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bretan, M., Hoffman, G., Weinberg, G.: Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 78, 1–16 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cappella, J.N.: Mutual influence in expressive behavior: adult-adult and infantadult dyadic interaction. Psychol. Bull. 89(1), 101–132 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung, M.F., Lee, J.J., DePalma, N., Adalgeirsson, S.O., Hinds, P.J., Breazeal, C.: Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1555–1566. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mead, R., Matarić, M.J.: Robots have needs too: people adapt their proxemic preferences to improve autonomous robot recognition of human social signals. In: Proceedings of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 100–107 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patterson, M.L., Mullens, S., Romano, J.: Compensatory reactions to spatial intrusion. Sociometry 34, 114–121 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Snijders, D.: Robot’s recovery from invading personal space. Unpublished bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C.: Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5495–5502. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vroon, J.: Regulated reactive robotics: a formal framework. Unpublished master’s thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vroon, J., Kim, J., Koster, R.: Robot response behaviors to accommodate hearing problems. In: Proceedings of New Friends 2015, pp. 48–49. Windesheim Flevoland University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L., Syrdal, D.S., Nehaniv, C.L.: An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics. In: Proceedings of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 144–149 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper has partly been supported by the European Commission under contract number FP7-ICT-611153 (TERESA).

We are grateful for the critical and open-minded comments of Khiet Truong, Dennis Reidsma, Daniel Davison, Bob Schadenberg, Jan Kolkmeier, Michiel Joosse, Roelof de Vries, Jorge Gallego Pérez, Jeroen Linssen and Dirk Heylen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jered Vroon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vroon, J., Englebienne, G., Evers, V. (2016). Responsive Social Agents. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, JJ., Howard, A., Salichs, M., He, H. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9979. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47436-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47437-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics