Skip to main content

Modeling the Evolution of Ideological Landscapes Through Opinion Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social Simulation 2015

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 528))

Abstract

This paper explores the possibilities to explain the stylized facts of empirically observed ideological landscapes through the bounded confidence model of opinion dynamics. Empirically, left–right self-placements are often not normally distributed but have multiple peaks (e.g., extreme-left-center-right-extreme). Some stylized facts are extracted from histograms from the European Social Survey. In the bounded confidence model, agents repeatedly adjust their ideological position in their ideological neighborhood. As an extension of the classical model, agents sometimes completely reassess their opinion depending on their ideological openness and their propensity for reassessment, respectively. Simulations show that this leads to the emergence of clustered ideological landscapes similar to the ones observed empirically. However, not all stylized facts of real world ideological landscapes can be reproduced with the model.

Changes in the model parameters show that the ideological landscapes are susceptible to interesting slow and abrupt changes. A long term goal is to integrate models of opinion dynamics into the classical spatial model of electoral competition as a dynamic element taking into account that voters themselves shape the political landscape by adjusting their positions and preferences through interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: How can extremism prevail? a study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5 (4), 1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper & Row Publishers, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  4. ESS Round 1–5: European Social Survey Cumulative Rounds 1–5 Data. Data file edition 1.1. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ESS Round 6: European Social Survey Round 6 Data. Data file edition 2.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feld, S., Bernard, G.: Homophily and the focused organization of ties. In: Hedström, P., Bearman, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Chap. 22, pp. 521–543. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman, S.: Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 32 (2), 416–440 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fowler, J.H., Laver, M.: A tournament of party decision rules. J. Confl. Resolut. 52 (1), 68–92 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence, models, analysis and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5 (3), 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krause, U.: A discrete nonlinear and non-autonomous model of consensus formation. In: Elyadi, S., Ladas, G., Popenda, J., Rakowski, J. (eds.) Communications in Difference Equations, pp. 227–236 Gordon and Breach Pub, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laver, M.: Policy and the dynamics of political competition. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99 (02), 263–281 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laver, M., Schilperoord, M.: Spatial models of political competition with endogenous political parties. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 362 (1485), 1711–1721 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18 (12), 1819–1838 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz, J.: Fostering consensus in multidimensional continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence. In: Helbing, D. (ed.) Managing Complexity: Insights, Concepts, Applications. Understanding Complex Systems, pp. 321–334. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz, J.: Heterogeneous bounds of confidence: meet, discuss and find consensus! Complexity 15 (4), 43–52 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenz, J.: Netlogo Model: Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence. NetLogo User Community Models (2012). See also http://janlo.de/applets/bc.html

  17. Mäs, M., Flache, A., Helbing, D.: Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6 (10), e1000959 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pineda, M., Toral, R., Hernandez-Garcia, E.: Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics. J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. 2009 (08), P08001 (18pp.) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Urbig, D., Lorenz, J., Herzberg, H.: Opinion dynamics: The effect of the number of peers met at once. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 11 (2), 4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.-P.: Meet, discuss, and segregate! Complexity 7 (3), 55–63 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo.Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zaller, J.R.: The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. How Citizens Acquire Information and Convert It into Public Opinion, pp. 40–52. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Presented at ESSA@Work Groningen 2015. The author thanks Klaus Troitzsch, Nigel Gilbert, and Geeske Scholz for comments and advice. A former version of the paper was presented at ECPR General Conference Sept 3–6, 2014, Glasgow in the Panel P289 “Preference Formation and Formal Models of Politics.” Part of this research was funded by the German Research Council (DFG) grant no. LO2024/2-1 “Opinion Dynamics and Collective Decision: Procedures, Behavior and Systems Dynamics.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Lorenz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lorenz, J. (2017). Modeling the Evolution of Ideological Landscapes Through Opinion Dynamics. In: Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., Flache, A., de Roo, G., Hoogduin, L., Hemelrijk, C. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 528. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47252-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47253-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics